Skip to main content
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

Case Results

Based on our recently accumulated litigation database, we provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

24 Hour Attorney in New York | O-1B Visa Approval for an Architectural Designer Following OPT Status



This case study highlights the successful approval of an O-1B visa petition for an architectural designer who had been working in New York under Optional Practical Training (OPT) and sought to continue professional activities without interruption. 

 

The matter demonstrates how a 24 hour attorney approach can be critical when immigration timing, agency error, and professional licensing considerations intersect. 

 

Through careful legal analysis, proactive filing strategy, and assertive advocacy with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the petition was approved within an accelerated timeframe despite procedural complications.

 

The case unfolded entirely in New York and was governed by applicable federal immigration statutes, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as well as New York professional practice regulations relevant to architectural design services. 

 

No violations of state or federal law were alleged or implicated at any stage of the process.

contents


1. 24 Hour Attorney in New York | Immigration Strategy Overview


24 Hour Attorney in New York

 

 

This matter required immediate legal intervention due to the approaching expiration of the client’s OPT employment authorization. 

 

The legal strategy focused on preserving lawful status, establishing extraordinary ability under O-1B standards, and coordinating compliance with New York professional practice norms.

 

The petition was prepared and filed in accordance with 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(15)(O) and 8 C.F.R. §214.2(o), which govern O-1 classification for individuals of extraordinary ability in the arts, including architectural design.



Transition from OPT to O-1B Without Status Gap


The client had been employed by a New York–based design studio under OPT following completion of a U.S. graduate program. 

 

Because OPT authorization is strictly time limited under federal regulation, even minor delays could have resulted in loss of work authorization.

 

A 24 hour attorney consultation was conducted to assess eligibility, timing, and risk exposure, and the legal team structured the filing to ensure continuous lawful presence and employment authorization under federal immigration law.



2. 24 Hour Attorney in New York | O-1B Eligibility and Evidence Development


O-1B petitions require detailed documentation demonstrating distinction and recognition in the field of arts, as defined under federal regulations. 

 

Architectural design, while often overlapping with licensed architectural practice, qualifies as an artistic discipline when framed correctly under immigration standards.

 

The case analysis carefully distinguished design based creative work from regulated architectural licensure, consistent with New York Education Law Article 147 governing architectural practice.



Demonstrating Extraordinary Ability in Architectural Design


The legal team assembled evidence including curated design portfolios, international exhibitions, published critiques, expert opinion letters, and documentation of leading roles in distinguished projects. 

 

All materials were reviewed to ensure alignment with USCIS adjudicatory standards and New York professional regulations.

 

By emphasizing conceptual design leadership rather than sealed architectural drawings, the petition complied with New York licensing requirements while fully satisfying federal O-1B criteria.



3. 24 Hour Attorney in New York | Response to USCIS Premium Processing Error


Although premium processing was properly requested and the required filing fee was timely paid, USCIS processing delays occurred due to internal agency error. 

 

This situation required immediate and knowledgeable legal action to prevent adverse impact on the client’s employment continuity.

 

The legal response was handled in real time, consistent with a 24 hour attorney service model.



Resolving Government Error and Securing Refund


The firm formally contacted USCIS, documented the processing defect, and requested corrective action pursuant to USCIS premium processing regulations. 

 

As a result, the premium processing fee was refunded in full, and the petition was adjudicated and approved within approximately twenty calendar days.

 

This outcome preserved the client’s lawful status and allowed uninterrupted professional activity in New York.



4. 24 Hour Attorney in New York | Outcome and Legal Significance


The O-1B petition was approved without a Request for Evidence or further delay, allowing the client to continue high level architectural design work in New York. 

 

The case underscores the importance of immediate legal access, regulatory fluency, and jurisdiction specific knowledge.

 

This matter illustrates how a 24 hour attorney approach can mitigate risk when timing, agency oversight, and professional regulation converge under U.S. immigration law.



Compliance with Federal Immigration Law and New York Regulations


Throughout the process, the case remained fully compliant with the Immigration and Nationality Act, applicable federal regulations, and New York laws governing professional services. 

 

No disciplinary, civil, or criminal issues were implicated.

 

The approval stands as a model for similarly situated creative professionals seeking O-1B classification in New York.


24 Dec, 2025


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone