Skip to main content

call now

  • About
  • lawyers
  • practices
  • Insights
  • Case Results
  • Locations
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

AccessibilityCookie StatementDisclaimersLegal NoticePrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
BROCHURE DOWNLOAD

U.S.

New York
Washington, D.C.

Asia

Seoul
Busan
BROCHURE DOWNLOAD

© 2025 SJKP, LLP
All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

BROCHURE DOWNLOAD
Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone

  1. Home
  2. Assault Penalties | Dismissal Through Strategic Defense Non prosecution

Case Results

Based on our recently accumulated litigation database, we provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

Assault Penalties | Dismissal Through Strategic Defense Non prosecution

Author : Donghoo Sohn, Esq.



In this comprehensive case study focusing on assault penalties under New York law, we examine how a defendant initially facing serious allegations involving a dangerous instrument ultimately secured a favorable outcome. 

 

The purpose of this case analysis is to illustrate how assault penalties may apply in New York, how legal strategies can influence prosecutorial decisions, and how defense attorneys work to reduce or dismiss charges even when the alleged conduct appears severe. 

 

This case study demonstrates the value of timely legal intervention, the importance of medical evidence when assessing intent, and how mitigating factors influence assault penalties in New York.

contents


1. Assault Penalties | background


Personal Injury Attorney in New York | Manhattan Case Overview

 

The following section provides an overview of the defendant’s circumstances and the context under which assault penalties could have been applied in New York. 

 

The defendant’s family contacted a defense lawyer after an elderly mother became the target of criminal investigation involving the use of a household knife. 

 

The primary concern was the potential range of assault penalties and the long term impact of prosecution.



Defendant overview


The defendant was an elderly woman with a long term history of mental health issues who experienced repeated conflicts with a neighbor. 

 

Her declining condition created confusion, and escalating anxiety led to an unexpected confrontation. Under New York law, assault penalties involving a dangerous instrument can be severe, often triggering felony level exposure.

 

· The defendant mistakenly believed the neighbor had stolen her clothing.

 

· In a moment of panic, she displayed a kitchen knife, creating a threatening situation.

 

· A physical struggle followed, resulting in minor injuries to the neighbor.

 

· These facts placed her at risk of facing assault penalties under NY Penal Law §120.05.



Reconstructed incident timeline


The defense attorney conducted interviews, reviewed prior medical records, and reorganized the incident chronology to ensure that assault penalties would not be unfairly escalated. Key elements included:

 

· Diminished capacity due to dementia and paranoid delusions

· Lack of malicious intent

· Immediate cooperation with authorities

· No attempt to flee or conceal evidence



2. Assault Penalties | legal strategy


This section outlines how defense counsel built a persuasive strategy to minimize assault penalties based on medical documentation, investigative materials, and negotiations with the victim.



Medical documentation submission


To counter the prosecution’s initial evaluation, the attorney gathered medical records proving:

 

▶ Diagnoses including non organic psychosis, Alzheimer’s dementia, and delusional disorders

 

▶ Repeated psychiatric hospitalizations

 

▶ Ongoing medication management affecting judgment and cognition


Because assault penalties in New York often depend on demonstrating intent, these documents were critical in showing severely limited capacity.



Victim negotiation and resolution


While cases involving a dangerous instrument often trigger heightened assault penalties, the defense attorney sought to de escalate through structured communication with the victim. 

 

The attorney emphasized:

 

▶ The defendant’s medical condition

 

▶ Low likelihood of recurrence due to full time family supervision

 

▶ Relocation of the defendant to eliminate contact risk


These discussions led the victim to formally express no desire for further prosecution, significantly influencing assault penalties considerations.



3. Assault Penalties | mitigation plan


This portion describes the defense team’s efforts to demonstrate that the defendant posed no ongoing threat, which directly influenced the prosecutor’s decision regarding assault penalties.



Risk management evidence


To reduce the perceived need for harsh assault penalties, the attorney submitted:

 

▶ Proof of continuous psychiatric treatment

 

▶ Family oversight ensuring she was never unsupervised

 

▶ Documentation of her move to a new residence


This comprehensive framework showed that any risk of reoffending had been eliminated.



Supporting materials


Additional materials that helped reduce the likelihood of assault penalties included:

 

▶ Family letters outlining long term care arrangements

 

▶ A detailed supervision plan

 

▶ Medical opinions stating that her condition was stabilized



4. Assault Penalties | outcome


After review, the prosecution acknowledged several favorable elements including diminished intent, lack of danger to the public, and the victim’s cooperation. 

 

These factors influenced the ultimate assessment of assault penalties.



Final disposition


Instead of pursuing felony assault charges under NY Penal Law §120.05, the prosecutor granted a decline to prosecute / dismissal equivalent. Elements considered:

 

· Consistent and honest statements

· No attempt to hide evidence

· Documented mental health history

· Victim’s clear non prosecution request


This disposition prevented any assault penalties from being imposed.



Understanding assault penalties


To understand why this outcome was significant, consider that New York assault penalties can include:

 

· Up to 7 years’ imprisonment for Assault in the Second Degree

· Up to 1 year for misdemeanor assault

· Additional consequences when a dangerous instrument is involved


Because the prosecutor accepted the defense’s mitigation, none of these assault penalties were applied.


Related lawyers

Tal Hirshberg attorney profile photo

Tal Hirshberg

Associate

New york

Contracts

Copyright

Corporate

Intellectual Property

Related practices


Criminal Evidence

Related case


Personal Injury Attorney Near Me | How a Personal Injury Attorney Near Me in New York Secured a Full Acquittal in a Wrongful Injury Charge

24 Nov, 2025


Older Posts

view list

Newer Posts

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Related lawyers

Tal Hirshberg attorney profile photo

Tal Hirshberg

Associate

New york

Contracts

Copyright

Corporate

Intellectual Property

Related practices


Criminal Evidence

Related case


Personal Injury Attorney Near Me | How a Personal Injury Attorney Near Me in New York Secured a Full Acquittal in a Wrongful Injury Charge

contents

  • Criminal trial attorney – Achieving a Suspended Sentence in a New York Fraud-Related Aiding Case

  • CFAA Violation | NYC Online Defamation Case Resolved with Minimal Penalty

  • Fraud Defense Attorney Near Me | Real Estate Marketing Fraud Charge Resulting in Full Acquittal

  • Penalties for Theft: A First-Time Shoplifting Charge