Skip to main content
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

Bronx Immigration Lawyer Securing L-1 Visa Approval for a New Office Despite USCIS RFE



Establishing a new U.S. entity often presents complex immigration challenges, particularly when transferring key managerial personnel under the L-1 visa category.


This case study examines how a Bronx immigration lawyer successfully overcame a rigorous Request for Evidence (RFE) issued by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) in a New Office L-1A petition.


Through precise statutory analysis, detailed organizational documentation, and compliance with both federal immigration regulations and New York business law, the case resulted in full approval and expedited visa issuance for the executive and accompanying family members.

Contents


1. Bronx Immigration Lawyer New York | Case Overview and Business Expansion Background


Bronx Immigration Lawyer New York

 

 

A mid sized international consulting firm established its first U.S. subsidiary in New York less than one year prior to filing.


Because the entity qualified as a “New Office” under federal immigration regulations, USCIS subjected the petition to heightened scrutiny regarding operational viability and managerial necessity.



New office classification and heightened federal review


Under 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(l)(3)(v), a U.S. entity operating for less than one year must demonstrate secured premises, realistic business projections, and the immediate need for an executive or managerial employee


USCIS closely reviewed whether the petitioning company could sustain operations beyond its initial startup phase while supporting a managerial level transferee.


The Bronx immigration lawyer structured the petition to align these federal requirements with New York corporate formation records and lease documentation.



2. Bronx Immigration Lawyer New York | L-1A Eligibility and Managerial Role Analysis


The beneficiary was a senior operations manager with over seven years of qualifying employment abroad, assigned to oversee U.S. market entry and internal controls.


USCIS issued an RFE questioning whether the position involved primarily executive and managerial duties rather than hands on operational tasks.



Managerial capacity under federal immigration standards


Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(44)(A), an L-1A manager must supervise professional employees or manage an essential function within the organization.


The legal team provided a detailed breakdown of decision making authority, budget oversight, and personnel planning, supported by internal policies and reporting structures.


By clearly separating strategic management functions from daily operational tasks, the Bronx immigration lawyer demonstrated compliance with statutory definitions.



3. Bronx Immigration Lawyer New York | Responding to USCIS Request for Evidence


The RFE demanded additional proof regarding staffing plans, revenue forecasts, and the beneficiary’s authority within the U.S. entity.


A comprehensive response was submitted within the statutory deadline, addressing each concern with documentary and legal precision.



Strategic documentation and legal argumentation


The response included a revised organizational chart, detailed job duty matrix, and a business growth plan consistent with 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(l)(3) requirements.


Financial projections were corroborated with New York tax registrations, bank statements, and commercial lease agreements executed under New York law.


The legal memorandum directly cited federal regulations while contextualizing the company’s operations within the New York commercial environment.



4. Bronx Immigration Lawyer New York | Approval Outcome and Family Immigration Benefits


Following RFE review, USCIS approved the L-1A petition for the maximum New Office validity period of one year.


Consular processing was completed without further inquiry, resulting in visa issuance for the principal applicant and dependent family members.



L-1 and L-2 visa issuance and compliance considerations


The principal applicant received L-1A status, while the spouse and children were issued L-2 visas pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(l)(7).


Because the petition was fully documented and legally sound, the family qualified for interview waiver processing.


This outcome underscores how a Bronx immigration lawyer can effectively navigate heightened scrutiny while ensuring full compliance with U.S. immigration law.


14 Jan, 2026


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone