Construction Lawyer NYC Defends Payment Offset Dispute

The contractor argued that all work had been completed in accordance with the contract.

Construction Lawyer NYC focused on examining whether the claimed additional work had been properly approved.

This analysis formed the foundation for limiting the contractor’s recovery.

The project owner alleged that structural and functional defects existed in the completed facilities.

Construction Lawyer NYC assessed whether these defects went beyond ordinary wear or maintenance issues.

This distinction was critical under New York construction law.

The first issue concerned whether the contractor’s payment demand complied with the construction contract.

Construction Lawyer NYC analyzed billing records and contract provisions governing payment milestones.

Unsupported or inflated claims were systematically challenged.

Another major issue was whether any additional construction work had been pre approved.

Construction Lawyer NYC emphasized that New York courts generally require clear agreement for extra work.

The absence of proper authorization weakened the contractor’s position.

Independent expert evaluations were used to document construction defects.

Construction Lawyer NYC demonstrated that the defects constituted construction errors rather than usage issues.

The court accepted this reasoning and recognized substantial repair costs.

Construction Lawyer NYC asserted that damages from defects should be offset against any remaining payment obligations.

This approach significantly reduced the project owner’s financial exposure.

Setoff arguments played a decisive role in the final judgment.

For one defendant entity, the contractor’s entire payment claim was dismissed.

Construction Lawyer NYC successfully demonstrated that counterclaim damages exceeded the amounts sought.

For another entity, only a limited portion of the claim was upheld.

The court awarded a substantial percentage of documented defect repair costs as damages.

Construction Lawyer NYC ensured that expert findings were clearly tied to construction errors.

This significantly strengthened the counterclaim outcome.

Project owners should document additional costs and conduct inspections throughout construction.

Construction Lawyer NYC advises preserving expert reports and inspection records for potential litigation.

These materials often determine leverage in payment disputes.

Contractors relying on informal agreements for extra work face heightened risk.

Construction Lawyer NYC stresses the importance of written approvals.

Without them, additional payment claims may lack legal support.

SJKP worked closely with experts to establish defect liability.

Construction Lawyer NYC structured counterclaims to maximize offset potential.

This integrated approach produced a materially favorable result.

From expert selection to courtroom advocacy, SJKP delivered consistent strategic execution.

Construction Lawyer NYC attorneys focus on minimizing exposure while preserving long term business interests.

Clients benefit from practical and results driven representation.

Construction Lawyer NYC at SJKP advises owners and developers in construction payment disputes, defect claims, and contract enforcement matters.

If you are facing a construction payment conflict or counterclaim exposure, early legal strategy is critical.

SJKP provides experienced guidance to protect your rights and financial interests under New York construction law.