Copyright Attorney in New York City Link Sharing Investigation

The content owner alleged that the shared link directed users to an unauthorized upload of a subscription based video.

Investigators obtained account registration data, timestamps, and IP address logs from the hosting platform. 

Law enforcement asserted that the public visibility of the post exposed the material to a broad audience. 

A copyright attorney New York City defendants consult reviewed whether the act of posting a hyperlink constituted actionable reproduction or distribution under applicable law.

Under federal copyright law, criminal liability generally requires willful infringement for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain. 

Courts often distinguish between direct infringement, contributory infringement, and mere reference to third party content. 

A copyright attorney New York City professionals trust evaluates whether the accused exercised control over the infringing file or merely referenced material stored elsewhere. 

The presence or absence of intent, financial benefit, and active participation can determine whether prosecution is appropriate.

The investigation revealed that the client did not upload, store, or host the video file. 

The link directed users to a separate platform operated by an unrelated third party. 

A copyright attorney New York City counsel may argue that without evidence of reproduction, public performance control, or financial exploitation, the essential elements of criminal infringement are lacking. 

The distinction between hosting infringing content and merely referencing it becomes critical in such matters.

Prosecutors examined whether the post was intended to generate advertising revenue or increase traffic for profit. 

The account showed no monetization features, subscription solicitations, or promotional incentives. 

A copyright attorney New York City defendants retain can present evidence that the post occurred in a casual discussion context without commercial motive. 

The absence of financial gain and the lack of repeated conduct may weigh heavily against criminal enforcement.

Counsel reviewed whether the hyperlink embedded or streamed the content directly within the forum page. 

The analysis showed that users were redirected to an external website, and the forum did not cache or store the file. 

A copyright attorney New York City legal team can use such technical distinctions to argue that the accused neither controlled nor transmitted the copyrighted work.

Technical architecture frequently influences how courts interpret digital conduct.

Before the scheduled interview with detectives in Queens, counsel prepared the client to provide clear and consistent explanations. 

The statement emphasized the absence of knowledge regarding the licensing status of the third party upload. 

A copyright attorney New York City representation may prevent speculative or inaccurate statements that could be misinterpreted as admissions. 

Careful preparation ensures that investigators receive accurate context rather than assumptions.