Criminal Immigration Lawyer NYC Resolves Passport Ban Without U.S. Departure

While visiting the Korean Consulate in New York to renew a passport, the client was informed that issuance was prohibited.

The consulate explained that the client had been reported for violation of Korea’s Military Service Act.

This designation automatically restricted passport renewal and overseas travel documentation.

Upon inquiry, the Military Manpower Administration confirmed that the client had failed to obtain overseas travel authorization by the statutory deadline.

Under Korean law, nationals residing abroad must apply for authorization or extension by January 15 of the year they turn eighteen.

Because this step had not been completed, the client was classified as evading military service and reported to prosecutors.

Counsel analyzed the Military Service Act alongside its legislative amendments and enforcement history.

The review showed that the client’s circumstances did not align with cases typically subject to criminal punishment.

Even assuming potential liability, the statutory limitation period for prosecution had already expired.

The legal team prepared a detailed written submission to the competent prosecutor.

This included precedent decisions and interpretive guidance confirming that prosecution was either impermissible or time barred.

The submission emphasized that continued designation served no legal purpose.

Following a formal request to reopen and review the case, the assigned prosecutor accepted the defense position.

A determination of no prosecutorial authority was issued based on expiration of the limitation period.

The previous suspension status was lifted accordingly.

Because the criminal designation was removed, the passport restriction was automatically lifted.

The client was able to complete passport renewal through the New York consulate.

No travel disruption or further administrative penalties followed.

The Seoul High Prosecutors’ Office reviewed the objection filed by the administrative authority.

After examining the legal reasoning, the appeal was dismissed.

The original determination of no prosecutorial authority was upheld.

With the appeal denied, the case reached final resolution.

The client’s legal status remained clear, and no further action was required.

The passport was issued without restriction.

Many individuals are unaware that administrative designations can trigger criminal reporting.

Early legal analysis can determine whether allegations are enforceable at all.

In some cases, issues can be resolved without physical presence.

This case demonstrates that cross border criminal matters do not always require return travel.

Well prepared submissions grounded in statute and precedent can be decisive.

Proper strategy minimizes personal and immigration risk.

SJKP represents clients facing criminal or administrative exposure affecting immigration and travel status.

The firm coordinates legal strategy across jurisdictions while clients remain in the United States.

Through precise legal analysis and advocacy, SJKP works to resolve matters efficiently and discreetly.

If unresolved foreign criminal allegations are affecting your passport or immigration status, SJKP can evaluate your options under applicable law.

Early intervention may allow resolution without unnecessary travel or investigation.

For confidential guidance, request a consultation with a Criminal Immigration Lawyer NYC at SJKP.