Skip to main content
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

Case Results

Based on our recently accumulated litigation database, we provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

Driving Under The Influence Case : Severe Penalties Avoided Through Strategic Defense



Facing Driving Under The Influence charges in New York can be overwhelming particularly when the driver believes they were sober and the BAC result appears unexpectedly high.

In this case, the client immediately retained a seasoned New York criminal-defense attorney experienced in Driving Under The Influence litigation.

The case ultimately uncovered potential issues with the breath-testing device and highlighted mitigating circumstances that significantly influenced the judge’s decision. 

nderstanding New York’s impairment laws, how BAC levels are measured, and the critical components of a strong defense can dramatically change the outcome of any Driving Under The Influence proceeding.

contents


1. Driving Under The Influence New York | Client Seeks Immediate Legal Counsel


A New York professional contacted a defense firm after being charged with Driving Under The Influence New York during his morning commute. 

Despite drinking moderately the night before, he believed he had fully sobered up after more than 10 hours of sleep.

Nonetheless, a routine NYPD checkpoint produced a BAC reading high enough to trigger administrative suspension. 

Recognizing that Driving Under The Influence New York carries strict penalties criminal and professional he acted quickly to secure counsel.



Attorney Learns the Background of the Case


During consultation, the attorney learned that the client consumed alcohol only the previous evening and had not felt impaired when driving. 

The roadside test, however, registered a BAC level inconsistent with his expectations.

The attorney examined whether factors such as delayed alcohol absorption, metabolic variables, or procedural issues may have contributed to an inaccurate Driving Under The Influence result.



2. Driving Under The Influence New York | Understanding DUI Laws and Potential Penalties


New York’s Driving Under The Influence laws, found in Vehicle and Traffic Law §1192, impose escalating penalties based on BAC level, prior convictions, and aggravating circumstances. 

Even first-time offenders face significant consequences.



Key DUI Standards and Penalty Ranges


BAC Level

NY Classification

Possible Penalties

0.08%+

DWI

Up to 1 year jail; fines $500–$1,000

0.05–0.07%

DWAI

Fines, license sanctions

0.18%+

Aggravated DWI

Up to 1 year jail; higher fines

Repeat Driving Under The Influence New York offenses within 10 years may become felonies, carrying multi-year prison exposure.



Administrative and Professional Consequences


For many New York professionals including public employees any Driving Under The Influence conviction threatens employment status.

License suspension, disciplinary actions, and mandatory reporting requirements can follow.

Early defense intervention is essential to preserve rights, challenge test accuracy, and avoid cascading consequences.



3. Driving Under The Influence New York | Defense Strategy and Case Preparation


Driving Under The Influence New York | Defense Strategy and Case Preparation

 

The firm formed a specialized team experienced in Driving Under The Influence New York litigation. 

Reviewing the breath-test records, police procedures, and calibration logs, counsel identified several critical issues that undermined the reliability of the BAC result.



First Strategy: Challenging Metabolism Assumptions and BAC Accuracy


The attorney highlighted that more than 10 hours had passed since alcohol consumption, making residual impairment unlikely under normal metabolic rates.

This scientific inconsistency raised substantial doubt regarding the BAC reading. 

Expert consultation supported the argument that environmental factors and device sensitivity may produce artificially elevated results unrelated to active intoxication.



Second Strategy: Identifying Potential Device Error


During discovery, the defense uncovered that the breath-testing device recorded the wrong date, showing a previous day rather than the day of arrest.

This discrepancy strongly suggested operational or documentation errors. 

When questioned, the officer conceded that device malfunction was possible significantly weakening the prosecution’s Driving Under The Influence New York case.

This admission became central to demonstrating that the BAC reading was unreliable.



4. Driving Under The Influence New York | Court’s Decision


After reviewing the technical irregularities and hearing the defense’s arguments, the court acknowledged that the prosecution failed to prove the accuracy of the BAC result beyond a reasonable doubt.

The judge determined that the breath-test reliability issues, combined with the client’s credible explanation, warranted leniency.



Outcome: Reduced Fine and Avoidance of Severe Penalties


Instead of facing long-term license suspension, harsh fines, or jail time, the client received only a minimal fine.

He avoided incarceration and preserved his employment an especially significant outcome given the professional risks associated with Driving Under The Influence New York charges.

The client expressed deep appreciation for the legal team’s thorough investigation and effective courtroom advocacy.



If You Are Facing a Driving Under The Influence Charge in New York, SJKP Can Help


SJKP’s New York defense team handles complex Driving Under The Influence cases involving:


• Breath-test discrepancies
• Checkpoint irregularities
• Administrative-license hearings
• Professional-licensing concerns

 

Our attorneys analyze every technical detail from calibration records to officer testimony to build the strongest possible defense.

If you or someone you know is under investigation for Driving Under The Influence New York, contact SJKP for a confidential consultation and strategic legal representation.


04 Dec, 2025


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone