Skip to main content
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

Case Results

Based on our recently accumulated litigation database, we provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

DUI Charges | How a NYC Professional Secured a No-Charge Outcome After a Borderline BAC Reading



Facing DUI Charges in New York is a life-altering event particularly for individuals whose professional licenses or employment depend on a clean driving record.

In this case, a New York City resident was stopped at a late-night checkpoint in Manhattan and recorded a borderline Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) result just above the statutory threshold.

Although New York enforces strict perse DUI standards based on measurable BAC, investigative errorsabsorption-phase science, and procedural safeguards can significantly shift the outcome of a DUI case.

This case demonstrates how careful scientific reconstructionlegal analysis, and strategic advocacy led to a no-charge (decline-to-prosecute) result for an individual initially accused of DUI in NYC.

contents


1. DUI Charges NYC – Understanding the Legal Definition and Its Application


New York defines DUI Charges under VTL §1192 as operating a motor vehicle with a BAC of 0.08% or more, though DWAI-Alcohol begins at 0.05%.

In borderline cases including test results barely above the limit—timingmetabolismprocedural compliance, and technical accuracy often become outcome-determinative.



Concept of Impairment and BAC Science


In NYC DUI cases, the severity of DUI Charges hinges not only on the recorded BAC but also on scientifically supported factors such as food intakeabsorption ratesmetabolic variability, and the time gap between driving and chemical testing.

BAC typically rises for 30–90 minutes after drinking, meaning a person may register a higher BAC during testing than at the actual time of driving.

This principle widely addressed in New York case law—can undermine the prosecution’s assumption that the measured BAC reflects the driver’s actual impairment during vehicle operation.



2. DUI Charges NYC – Facts of the Initial Consultation


The individual seeking advice for DUI Charges had consumed a single serving of traditional Korean rice wine with a meal at a company dinner.

Roughly 20 minutes after finishing the beverage, he drove home through Midtown Manhattan and encountered an NYPD sobriety checkpoint.

A chemical breath test produced a reading of 0.036%, slightly above New York’s DWAI-Alcohol threshold of 0.05% once converted to NY’s measurement standards.

Because the driver’s employment required a valid commercial-related license, any conviction even for DWAI would jeopardize his livelihood.



Reconstructing the Timeline and BAC Variables


To challenge the DUI Charges, the defense team reconstructed the full timeline:
 

  • Food + Alcohol Intake Interaction– The drink was consumed with a substantial meal, delaying absorption.
  • Short Time Interval Before Driving– Only minutes passed between drinking and operation of the vehicle.
  • Testing Delay– The breath test occurred during the rising-BAC phase.
  • Metabolic and Physiological Factors– The driver’s body composition and metabolism supported a lower BAC at the time of driving.
  • Instrument Accuracy Review– Breathalyzer calibration and NY VTL §1194 compliance were scrutinized.


Each factor suggested the recorded result overstated the BAC at the actual time of driving.

 



Legal Precedent and Analytical Application


Relevant precedents were used to frame reasonable doubt regarding the DUI Charges, including:

Case

Key Holding

Application

NY Court of Appeals – Rising BAC Principle

Chemical test results are not conclusive of BAC at the time of driving.

Supports argument that BAC was lower while driving.

NY Trial Courts – Minor Deviations Insufficient for Conviction

Marginal BAC levels cannot alone sustain conviction without corroboration.

0.036% is scientifically ambiguous.

Using these holdings, the attorney argued that a borderline BAC cannot legally establish impairment under VTL §1192.



3. DUI Charges NYC – Evidence Development and Result


DUI Charges NYC – Evidence Development and Result

 

A detailed evidentiary package was prepared to counter the DUI Charges, integrating scientificfactual, and legal analysis.



Defense Materials and Advocacy Strategy


The legal team prepared:

 

  • Pre-Interview Coaching– Ensuring accurate factual statements.
  • Officer-Interaction Review– Evaluating checkpoint procedures.
  • Mitigation Packet– Employment records and character references.
  • Formal Defense Memorandum– Linking science, timelines, and statutory standards.

 

This preparation persuaded authorities that the evidence did not support formal DUI Charges.



Outcome and Closing Action


Authorities ultimately issued a decline-to-prosecute determination, resolving the matter with no DUI Charges filed.

The driver retained his license, avoided court, and preserved his career.



4. DUI Charges NYC – Penalty Framework and Risk Awareness


New York imposes escalating penalties for DUI Charges, even on first-time offenders.



Penalty Structure Overview


BAC Level

Offense

Penalty

0.05–0.07%

DWAI-Alcohol

Fine + up to 15 days jail + license impact

0.08–0.18%

DUI

Up to 1 year jail + fines + revocation

≥0.18%

Aggravated DUI

Higher penalties

Refusal

Test Refusal

1-year revocation + civil penalties

Because administrative consequences are strictly tied to BAC, early legal intervention is critical.



5. DUI Charges NYC – Immediate Response Checklist


  • Document timing of drinks and meals.
  • Preserve receipts and witness info.
  • Do not give detailed statements before consulting counsel.
  • Check breath-test compliance and accuracy.
  • Contact a DUI specialist immediately.
  • Proper early handling can dramatically shift the trajectory of DUI Charges.

 

 

SJKP provides scientific-legal analysisprocedural scrutiny, and strategic defensefor professionals facing DUI Charges.

If you or someone you know is facing DUI Charges in NYC, contact SJKP for immediate guidance.


30 Nov, 2025


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone