1. Experienced Immigration Attorney New York | Case Background and Student Immigration Context
This section outlines the factual background of the client’s stay in New York and explains why consultation with an experienced immigration attorney was essential at an early stage.
The analysis focused on lawful student status, post graduation options, and timing considerations under federal immigration law as applied in New York.
Graduate study in New York and maintenance of lawful status
The client entered the United States approximately two years prior on an F-1 student visa to enroll in a master’s degree program at a New York based educational institution certified under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP).
During the academic period, the client maintained full time enrollment and complied with all reporting requirements under 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(f), which governs F-1 student status.
The institution’s authority to enroll international students was consistent with federal SEVIS requirements and New York State Education Law provisions regulating degree granting institutions.
No unauthorized employment or status violations occurred during the course of study, which became a critical foundation for subsequent immigration planning.
2. Experienced Immigration Attorney New York | Post Graduation Concerns and Legal Eligibility Review
After completing the master’s degree program, the client expressed a strong desire to remain in the United States but was uncertain about available immigration pathways.
This phase required precise legal interpretation to prevent unlawful presence or inadvertent status lapses.
Assessment of change of status eligibility under federal immigration law
An experienced immigration attorney conducted a comprehensive review of the client’s immigration history, academic records, and intended future activities.
The analysis focused on eligibility for a change of status pursuant to Section 248 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1258, which permits certain nonimmigrants to change status while remaining in the United States.
Special attention was given to timing rules, maintenance of status, and the distinction between immigrant intent and nonimmigrant intent, which is frequently scrutinized in post student cases.
New York specific considerations included the client’s physical presence, lawful residence, and compliance with local institutional and employment regulations.
3. Experienced Immigration Attorney New York | Strategic Planning and Application Preparation
Once eligibility was confirmed, a tailored legal strategy was developed to ensure procedural accuracy and evidentiary sufficiency.
This stage emphasized risk mitigation and consistency with both federal and New York relevant regulatory frameworks.
Structuring a compliant and well documented filing
The attorney explained each procedural step in detail, including applicable USCIS forms, supporting documentation, and expected adjudication timelines.
All filings were prepared in accordance with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services regulations and policies, with careful attention to lawful presence requirements under INA § 212(a)(9)(B).
Supporting evidence demonstrated the client’s continued compliance with U.S. law, educational completion in New York, and legitimate purpose for remaining in the country.
No aspects of Korean law were referenced, as the matter was analyzed exclusively under U.S. federal law and New York applicable regulations.
4. Experienced Immigration Attorney New York | Approval Outcome and Legal Significance
The application was approved without request for evidence or delay, allowing the client to remain lawfully in the United States under the new immigration status.
This outcome underscores the importance of early intervention by an experienced immigration attorney familiar with New York based cases.
Lawful continuation of stay and future immigration stability
As a result of the approved change of status, the client avoided unlawful presence and preserved eligibility for future immigration benefits under U.S. law.
The case demonstrates how accurate legal guidance, grounded in the Immigration and Nationality Act and corresponding federal regulations, can resolve uncertainty for international graduates in New York.
Importantly, this matter did not involve any criminal allegations, violations, or conduct that could constitute a crime under New York law or federal law.
The case was purely administrative and regulatory in nature, involving lawful immigration planning and compliance.
21 Dec, 2025
