False Accusation Lawyer: Perjury and False Reporting Charges

During the consultation, the attorney verified several critical issues relevant to false accusation analysis:

• The client experienced coercive, forceful behavior from the accuser on the day of the incident.
• The client underwent ongoing psychiatric treatment and counseling after the event, consistent with trauma related symptoms.
• The original police statement and hospital records contained detailed, contemporaneous accounts aligning with the client’s initial report.
• Potential CCTV footageand communication logs (including text messages) supported the client’s timeline.

Based on these findings, the false accusation lawyer concluded that a detailed legal analysis was necessary to determine whether the statutory elements for false reporting or perjury could be met under New York law.

New York law requires all the following elements:

• A purpose to cause another person to be subject to criminal investigation or prosecution.
• The reporting of information known to be false.
• Providing the false information to police, prosecutors, or public officials.

The false accusation lawyer noted that New York courts have repeatedly held that misunderstanding, trauma-related inconsistencies, or mistaken recollection do not constitute criminal false reporting.

Only deliberate fabrication satisfies the statute.

Perjury under NY Penal Law § 210.15 involves:

• A sworn court testimony,
• Knowledge that the testimony is false,
• Intent to mislead the court or influence the outcome.

The false accusation lawyer emphasized that inconsistencies between testimony and ultimate findings do not, on their own, establish perjury.

New York appellate cases reinforce that perjury must involve conscious deception not emotional confusion or memory gaps.

The attorney reconstructed the full sequence of events:

• The client described a coercive, force-based encounter, supported by communication records and the context of the relationship.
• CCTV footage and digital evidence aligned with the client’s immediate actions after the assault.
• Statements made to police and medical personnel reflected genuine distress rather than calculated manipulation.

These findings allowed the false accusation lawyer to argue that the original report was made sincerely, not maliciously.

The defense submitted proof of:

• Psychiatric evaluationsconfirming trauma symptoms,
• Treatment records showing ongoing anxiety, sleep disturbance, and emotional distress,
• Statements from medical providers corroborating the client’s psychological condition after the incident.

This evidence strongly contradicted the claim that the client had fabricated the allegation, a critical point for any false accusation lawyer handling a New York case.

The false accusation lawyer drew on New York case law such as the principle that acquittal of the accused does not automatically prove that the initial report was false.

The attorney emphasized:

• The client’s testimony was consistent with available evidence.
• No objective evidence indicated intentional deception.
• The accuser had potential motives to retaliate after being tried for sexual assault.

As a result, both false reporting and perjury allegations lacked the required intent element.

The case resulted in:

• A full dismissal of all allegations, including false reporting and perjury.
• Recognition that the client’s original report was made in good faith.
• No criminal liability and no further legal action.

The client, who had feared severe penalties and reputational damage, was able to return to daily life with peace of mind due to the careful work of the false accusation lawyer.

If you are facing allegations of false reporting, perjury, or fabrication in connection with sexual assault or any other sensitive matter, SJKP can help.

Our false accusation lawyer provides strategic guidance, evidence review, and comprehensive defense planning from the earliest stages of investigation.
If you need legal support, contact SJKP for a confidential consultation.