Immigration Consulting | E-2 Dependent Visa Approval

At the time of the dependent visa application, the principal E-2 visa holder was lawfully present in the United States and actively engaged in managerial or executive duties within a qualifying treaty enterprise.

The enterprise itself continued to satisfy E-2 treaty investment requirements, including operational viability and non marginality, which were central to the immigration consulting analysis.

Because federal immigration authorities in Washington D.C. Evaluate derivative visas through the lens of principal visa validity, maintaining clear proof of corporate continuity was a critical factor.

In practice, E-2 dependent family members may apply separately due to educational schedules, employment commitments abroad, or personal logistical considerations.

U.S. Immigration law does not prohibit such separate filings, provided that the principal applicant’s status remains valid and verifiable at the time of adjudication.

This case was structured through immigration consulting to ensure that separation in timing did not create any appearance of status discontinuity or eligibility lapse.

An E-2 dependent visa is not an independent nonimmigrant category but a derivative status that flows from the principal applicant’s treaty investor classification.

Accordingly, the dependent visa reflects the same corporate affiliation and expiration date as the principal E-2 visa, a standard outcome under U.S. Immigration practice.

In this case, immigration consulting ensured that the derivative relationship was clearly established without ambiguity despite the absence of a concurrent filing.

Washington D.C. Centered adjudication standards require that consular officers confirm three core elements: the principal applicant’s lawful status, the validity of the qualifying enterprise, and the legitimacy of the family relationship.

The dependent applicant’s intent is assessed as ancillary to the principal’s authorized stay, rather than as an independent nonimmigrant intent analysis.

This framework guided the documentation strategy developed through immigration consulting, preventing unnecessary scrutiny or misinterpretation.

Because the principal applicant did not attend the dependent’s visa interview, the submitted documentation was structured to independently demonstrate status linkage.

Corporate records, visa validity evidence, and proof of lawful U.S. Operations were presented in a manner that allowed the file to speak for itself.

This immigration consulting approach reduced reliance on oral explanations and minimized discretionary risk.

The consular interview focused primarily on confirmation of the principal applicant’s ongoing E-2 activities and the dependent’s intended scope of stay.

Prepared responses emphasized factual consistency and avoided speculative or unnecessary details, aligning with Washington D.C. Adjudication norms.

As a result, the interview concluded without requests for supplemental documentation or administrative processing.

The approval was granted without delay or additional evidence requests, reflecting a well aligned immigration consulting strategy.

The dependent visa remains fully synchronized with the principal E-2 visa for future extension or renewal considerations.