Skip to main content

call now

Search Menu
  • About
  • lawyers
  • practices
  • Insights
  • Case Results
  • Notice
  • Locations
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

AccessibilityCookie StatementDisclaimersLegal NoticePrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
BROCHURE DOWNLOAD

U.S.

New York
Washington, D.C.

Asia

Seoul
Busan
BROCHURE DOWNLOAD

© 2025 SJKP, LLP
All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

BROCHURE DOWNLOAD
Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone

  1. Home
  2. Industrial Accident Attorney | Damages for Injury Caused

Case Results

Based on our recently accumulated litigation database, we provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

Industrial Accident Attorney | Damages for Injury Caused



This case study examines a serious workplace injury that occurred at a New York manufacturing facility, where a dispatched worker suffered permanent disability due to a malfunctioning industrial press machine. With the support of an experienced Industrial Accident Attorney, the injured worker successfully obtained significant compensation despite the employer’s attempts to shift blame. The case demonstrates how liability is assessed under New York law when multiple employers are involved in an industrial accident.By focusing on unsafe machinery, inadequate supervision, and failures in workplace safety management, the court reduced the worker’s comparative fault and ruled largely in his favor. This case highlights the critical role an Industrial Accident Attorney plays in uncovering systemic safety failures and securing just compensation for injured workers in New York.

Contents


1. Industrial Accident Attorney New York – Facts and Background of the Accident


This section outlines the factual background of the industrial accident and the working relationship between the parties. The details were central to determining liability under New York labor and tort law. From the beginning, the involvement of an Industrial Accident Attorney was essential to properly frame the claims.


Dispatch Work Arrangement and Factory Assignment


The plaintiff was employed by one company but dispatched to work at a separate New York manufacturing facility operated by another entity. 

While performing assigned duties at the host company’s site, the plaintiff operated a press machine used in mass production. 

As a dispatched worker, he relied entirely on the host company’s equipment, safety systems, and on-site supervision, making workplace safety obligations a key issue for any Industrial Accident Attorney.

This type of multi-employer arrangement is common in New York’s industrial sector, but it also creates complex questions regarding responsibility for safe working conditions.



Press Machine Malfunction and Permanent Injury


In October 2020, the safety sensor on the press machine malfunctioned and failed to stop the machine during operation. 

As a result, the plaintiff’s finger was crushed and severed, causing permanent physical impairment. 

The injury required immediate medical intervention and resulted in lasting disability, significantly affecting the plaintiff’s ability to work and quality of life.

An Industrial Accident Attorney quickly identified that the failure of a safety device pointed to potential negligence in equipment maintenance and safety oversight, forming the foundation of the damages claim.



2. Industrial Accident Attorney New York – Claims and Litigation Strategy


This section explains the legal claims brought by the injured worker and the defenses raised by the employers. The litigation focused on negligence, safety management failures, and comparative fault. Strategic advocacy by an Industrial Accident Attorney was critical in countering the employers’ arguments.


Damages Claim and Legal Basis


The plaintiff filed a civil lawsuit in New York seeking damages for the industrial accident, including medical expenses, lost earning capacity, and compensation for permanent disability. 

The total claim amounted to approximately $69,438,500, along with statutory interest at an annual rate permitted under New York law.

Although workers’ compensation often limits employer liability, the Industrial Accident Attorney structured the case to pursue additional tort damages based on unsafe machinery and inadequate workplace management by the host company.



Employers’ Defense and Allegations of Worker Negligence


The defendants argued that the plaintiff failed to follow safety rules and ignored work instructions, asserting that his own negligence was the primary cause of the accident. 

They claimed that the injury resulted from improper handling of the machine rather than any defect or safety failure.

In response, the Industrial Accident Attorney emphasized that even if a worker makes a mistake, employers in New York retain a non-delegable duty to provide safe equipment and proper supervision, especially where dangerous machinery is involved.



3. Industrial Accident Attorney New York – Court’S Decision and Reasoning


This section summarizes the New York court’s ruling and its reasoning on liability and damages. The decision reflects how courts balance employer responsibility against worker conduct in industrial injury cases. The arguments advanced by the Industrial Accident Attorney were central to the outcome.


Liability Findings and Damage Award


The court ruled that the defendants were jointly liable for the accident and ordered them to pay the plaintiff $63,087,234 in damages, along with annual interest. 

The court also allocated litigation costs, requiring the defendants to bear the majority of the expenses.

In reaching this conclusion, the court accepted the Industrial Accident Attorney’s argument that the malfunctioning safety sensor and lack of proper machine oversight were decisive factors in causing the injury.



Comparative Fault Reduced to 10 Percent


While the court acknowledged that the plaintiff may have contributed minimally to the accident, it found that his comparative fault was limited to approximately 10 percent. 

This was significantly lower than in typical industrial accident cases where worker error plays a larger role.

The reduction in comparative fault was directly attributable to evidence presented by the Industrial Accident Attorney, including witness testimony and documentation showing poor maintenance practices and inadequate safety training by the defendants.



4. Industrial Accident Attorney New York – Significance and Practical Implications


This final section discusses the broader implications of the case for industrial workplaces in New York.The ruling provides guidance on safety obligations, dispatched worker protections, and litigation strategy.It also underscores the value of retaining an Industrial Accident Attorney after a serious injury.


Employer Safety Duties in Industrial Settings


The case reinforces that employers and host companies in New York must actively manage machinery safety and worker supervision. 

Safety devices must be properly maintained, and employers cannot rely solely on worker compliance to avoid liability.

For injured workers, the decision confirms that systemic safety failures can outweigh individual mistakes when properly demonstrated by an Industrial Accident Attorney.



Importance of Skilled Legal Representation


This case illustrates how detailed evidence collection, expert testimony, and strategic litigation can dramatically affect outcomes in industrial accident claims. Without effective advocacy, the plaintiff’s compensation could have been significantly reduced.

At SJKP, we provide comprehensive representation for injured workers in New York industrial accident cases, including claims involving defective machinery, dispatched labor, and permanent disability. 

Our Industrial Accident Attorney team is committed to uncovering the true causes of workplace accidents and securing fair compensation. 

If you or a loved one has been injured on the job, contact SJKP to discuss how we can help protect your rights.


Related practices


Workers’ Compensation

16 Dec, 2025


Older Posts

view list

Newer Posts

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Related practices


Workers’ Compensation

contents

  • New York Labor Attorneys Dismiss Unjust Enrichment Claim

  • Corporate Lawsuit Defense Dismissing a $40,000 Claim

  • Civil Damages Claim Dismissed in $2.1 Inherited Case

  • Corporate Attorney Unjust Enrichment Defense Victory