1. Investment Fraud Attorney New York – Understanding the Client’S Situation
Details of the Investment Arrangement
Key facts included:
- The acquaintance claimed to work as an art dealer for an “art-tech investment company.”
- The client signed a contract to purchase artwork while the company retained control over rental, display, and resale rights.
- The company promised monthly profit distributions and a guaranteed repurchase at the end of the agreement.
- The client invested approximately 100 million KRW(a significant USD equivalent).
These terms were highly one-sided, raising immediate concerns for an Investment Fraud Attorney.
How the Fraud Unfolded
After several months of partial payments, the acquaintance claimed:
- The company was facing “financial difficulties,”
- Monthly distributions would be discontinued,
- The company could not repurchase the artwork as promised.
Yet just one week earlier, the same company was actively recruiting new investors a clear sign of fraudulent activity.
2. Investment Fraud Attorney New York – Legal Concepts and Fraud Analysis
Understanding Investment Fraud and Ponzi Characteristics
The attorney identified several Ponzi-like elements:
- False representations about profit-generating art rentals,
- Guaranteed returns despite no viable revenue model,
- A repurchase promise that the company lacked funds to fulfill.
These patterns closely mirrored traditional Ponzi structures.
Remedies for Victims of Investment Fraud
Victims may pursue:
- Criminal complaints to initiate investigation,
- Civil litigation to recover investment funds,
- Restitution orders in criminal cases.
Civil litigation was chosen as the fastest path to recovery.
3. Investment Fraud Attorney New York – Litigation Strategy and Claims Filed
Establishing Fraudulent Misrepresentation
To prove fraud, the attorney showed:
- The company had no genuine rental or resale activity,
- Monthly profits were funded by new investor money,
- The repurchase guarantee was impossible to perform,
- The company concealed the true financial condition.
These facts demonstrated intent to deceive, establishing fraud liability.
Proving the Right to Full Compensation
The attorney demanded full repayment of the 100 million KRW investment, arguing:
- Fraudulent inducement damages equal the full amount paid,
- The company obtained funds through misrepresentation,
- No legitimate product or service of value was provided.
Thus, full restitution was the correct remedy.
4. Investment Fraud Attorney New York – Court Outcome and Recovery
Final Judgment and Client Relief
The outcome included:
- Full recovery of the 100 million KRW,
- Judicial recognition of the company’s deceptive model,
- Initiation of further criminal proceedings against both the acquaintance and the company.
Thanks to the Investment Fraud Attorney’s strategy, the client received complete compensation and additional legal protection.
If you were deceived by an investment, art-tech program, or Ponzi scheme, SJKP can help.
Our Investment Fraud Attorney team evaluates contracts, communications, and financial structures to build a recovery plan.
For confidential guidance, contact SJKP today.
24 Nov, 2025

