Skip to main content
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

Case Results

Based on our recently accumulated litigation database, we provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

Investment Fraud Attorney | How an Investment Fraud Attorney Recovered a Client’s Full Losses in a New York Art-Tech Scam



When a person becomes the victim of a deceptive investment scheme, the financial and emotional impact can be devastating.

In New York, complex frauds involving art-tech companiesresale guarantees, and promised returns are increasingly common.

In this case, our Investment Fraud Attorney assisted a client who was misled by a trusted acquaintance into investing a substantial sum in an art-based Ponzi like scheme.

The client had been promised steady monthly profits and full repurchase of artwork at the end of a contract term.

However, when payments stopped and the company refused to honor the repurchase obligation, the Investment Fraud Attorney initiated civil action to recover the full investment.

This case illustrates how strategic litigation and fraud analysis can lead to a complete recovery of losses.

contents


1. Investment Fraud Attorney New York – Understanding the Client’s Situation


The client approached our office after realizing that a close acquaintance had deceived him with false promises of guaranteed returns.

Although small payments were initially made, they abruptly stopped.

Our Investment Fraud Attorney immediately recognized Ponzi-style indicators and began reviewing the contract and payment history.



Details of the Investment Arrangement


Key facts included:

 

  • The acquaintance claimed to work as an art dealer for an “art-tech investment company.”
  • The client signed a contract to purchase artwork while the company retained control over rental, display, and resale rights.
  • The company promised monthly profit distributions and a guaranteed repurchase at the end of the agreement.
  • The client invested approximately 100 million KRW(a significant USD equivalent).

 

These terms were highly one-sided, raising immediate concerns for an Investment Fraud Attorney.



How the Fraud Unfolded


After several months of partial payments, the acquaintance claimed:

 

  • The company was facing “financial difficulties,”
  • Monthly distributions would be discontinued,
  • The company could not repurchase the artwork as promised.

 

Yet just one week earlier, the same company was actively recruiting new investors a clear sign of fraudulent activity.



2. Investment Fraud Attorney New York – Legal Concepts and Fraud Analysis


In New York, cases like this often involve:

 

  • Common Law Fraud,
  • Conversion,
  • Breach of Contract,
  • Potential violations of the Martin Act, New York’s securities-fraud statute.

 

An Investment Fraud Attorney must determine whether the conduct involved intentional deception or wrongful inducement.



Understanding Investment Fraud and Ponzi Characteristics


The attorney identified several Ponzi-like elements:

 

  • False representations about profit-generating art rentals,
  • Guaranteed returns despite no viable revenue model,
  • A repurchase promise that the company lacked funds to fulfill.

 

These patterns closely mirrored traditional Ponzi structures.



Remedies for Victims of Investment Fraud


Victims may pursue:

 

  • Criminal complaints to initiate investigation,
  • Civil litigation to recover investment funds,
  • Restitution orders in criminal cases.

 

Civil litigation was chosen as the fastest path to recovery.



3. Investment Fraud Attorney New York – Litigation Strategy and Claims Filed


The legal team filed a complaint alleging that the acquaintance and company intentionally induced the investment without the ability or intention to deliver promised returns.

The Investment Fraud Attorney argued that the conduct constituted intentional fraud under New York law.



Establishing Fraudulent Misrepresentation


To prove fraud, the attorney showed:

 

  • The company had no genuine rental or resale activity,
  • Monthly profits were funded by new investor money,
  • The repurchase guarantee was impossible to perform,
  • The company concealed the true financial condition.

 

These facts demonstrated intent to deceive, establishing fraud liability.



Proving the Right to Full Compensation


The attorney demanded full repayment of the 100 million KRW investment, arguing:

 

  • Fraudulent inducement damages equal the full amount paid,
  • The company obtained funds through misrepresentation,
  • No legitimate product or service of value was provided.

 

Thus, full restitution was the correct remedy.



4. Investment Fraud Attorney New York – Court Outcome and Recovery


Investment Fraud Attorney New York – Court Outcome and Recovery

 

After reviewing the evidence, the court accepted the attorney’s fraud analysis.

The judge ordered the company to repay the entire investment, finding that the fraudulent scheme directly caused the client’s losses.



Final Judgment and Client Relief


The outcome included:

 

  • Full recovery of the 100 million KRW,
  • Judicial recognition of the company’s deceptive model,
  • Initiation of further criminal proceedings against both the acquaintance and the company.

 

Thanks to the Investment Fraud Attorney’s strategy, the client received complete compensation and additional legal protection.

 

If you were deceived by an investment, art-tech program, or Ponzi scheme, SJKP can help.

Our Investment Fraud Attorney team evaluates contracts, communications, and financial structures to build a recovery plan.

For confidential guidance, contact SJKP today.


24 Nov, 2025


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone