Landlord Tenant Lawyer NYC Advises on Eviction

After the tenant closed the business, all contact ceased, leaving equipment and fixtures inside the premises.

The client could not regain possession through voluntary surrender.

Landlord Tenant Lawyer NYC determined that formal enforcement of a writ of eviction was the only lawful option.

Before initiating enforcement, the client requested a detailed estimate of expected costs.

Landlord Tenant Lawyer NYC was asked to explain deposits, labor, transport, and storage expenses.

The client also sought guidance on procedural risks.

Under New York law, landlords may not repossess property through self help.

Landlord Tenant Lawyer NYC emphasized that only a court authorized eviction executed by an enforcement officer is lawful.

Any deviation could expose the landlord to civil and criminal liability.

The client was responsible for advancing enforcement related expenses.

Landlord Tenant Lawyer NYC explained that these costs are calculated based on the scope of the premises and contents.

Understanding these obligations was essential for budgeting.

Landlord Tenant Lawyer NYC advised that enforcement officer deposits, labor costs, transportation, storage fees, and forced entry charges must be prepaid.

For premises of this size, the estimated cost was approximately four million won per floor.

This estimate allowed the client to evaluate financial feasibility.

The advisory clarified that the enforcement officer determines staffing and vehicle needs after an on site inspection.

Landlord Tenant Lawyer NYC explained that landlords cannot influence these determinations.

This prevented unrealistic cost expectations.

All tenant belongings must be removed and stored according to enforcement procedures.

Landlord Tenant Lawyer NYC explained that storage costs are initially paid by the landlord.

Recovery may occur later through auction of movable property.

The client was expressly warned against moving tenant property or occupying the space independently.

Landlord Tenant Lawyer NYC explained that such actions could constitute trespass or interference with business.

Potential civil damages and criminal exposure were highlighted.

By understanding costs and legal risks in advance, the client avoided impulsive actions.

Landlord Tenant Lawyer NYC ensured the client remained compliant with New York landlord tenant law.

This reduced exposure to liability.

The client is now internally reviewing whether to proceed with eviction based on cost benefit considerations.

Landlord Tenant Lawyer NYC provided the legal foundation for this analysis.

The client can move forward with confidence if enforcement becomes necessary.