1. Lawyer for Police Questioning in Washington D.C. | Client Facing Prostitution Suspicion
The client was contacted by Metropolitan Police Department investigators and informed that he was a subject of inquiry under Washington D.C. prostitution statutes.
Although no arrest had occurred, the circumstances suggested that formal questioning could rapidly escalate into criminal charges under D.C. Code § 22-2701.
Background of the Client and Initial Law Enforcement Contact
The client is a consumer research consultant involved in the development and testing of adult lifestyle products for lawful commercial distribution.
During a routine data review, law enforcement identified several payments and visits to residential units later associated with escort style service locations.
Investigators requested voluntary attendance for questioning, stating that the conduct appeared consistent with prostitution solicitation under District law.
2. Lawyer for Police Questioning in Washington D.C. | Legal Risk Under D.C. Prostitution Statutes
Under the Prostitution and Related Offenses Act of 2009, both offering and agreeing to engage in sexual acts for value may constitute a criminal offense in Washington D.C.
Even absent physical conduct, intent inferred from circumstantial evidence can expose an individual to prosecution.
Applicable Washington D.C. Law and Investigative Standards
Relevant statutes included D.C. Code § 22-2701, which defines prostitution as engaging or agreeing to engage in sexual acts in exchange for value.
Law enforcement may rely on indirect indicators such as payment timing, communication context, and location history to infer intent.
However, the statute requires proof of sexual intent rather than mere presence or lawful financial exchange.
3. Lawyer for Police Questioning in Washington D.C. | Defense Strategy Prior to Police Interview
Recognizing the risk of misinterpretation, the lawyer for police questioning developed a pre interview strategy focused on reframing the factual narrative.
The objective was to prevent ambiguous statements from being construed as admissions under District of Columbia criminal law.
Reconstructing Purpose and Context of the Client’s Conduct
The defense established that the client’s visits were conducted for lawful consumer feedback research related to product usability and market response.
Documentation demonstrated the client’s professional role, research protocols, and non sexual objectives.
Payment records were categorized as research stipends rather than compensation for sexual services.
Police Question Anticipation and Statement Preparation
The attorney prepared the client for common investigatory questions designed to elicit implied admissions.
Statements were carefully structured to remain accurate while avoiding terminology that could be misconstrued under § 22-2701.
The timing and order of documentary disclosure were strategically planned to support credibility.
4. Lawyer for Police Questioning in Washington D.C. | Police Interview Attendance and Case Resolution
The lawyer for police questioning attended the Metropolitan Police Department interview alongside the client to ensure procedural fairness.
Real time intervention prevented speculative assumptions from shaping the official record.
Direct Legal Advocacy During Police Questioning
Counsel clarified that monetary exchanges were unrelated to sexual activity and that no physical or sexual contact occurred.
Investigators were reminded of the statutory requirement of proving sexual intent beyond circumstantial presence. Following the interview, no arrest was made and the matter was closed without further action.
16 Dec, 2025
