Lawyer for Police Questioning Washington D.C. No Charges

The client is a consumer research consultant involved in the development and testing of adult lifestyle products for lawful commercial distribution. 

During a routine data review, law enforcement identified several payments and visits to residential units later associated with escort style service locations. 

Investigators requested voluntary attendance for questioning, stating that the conduct appeared consistent with prostitution solicitation under District law. 

Relevant statutes included D.C. Code § 22-2701, which defines prostitution as engaging or agreeing to engage in sexual acts in exchange for value. 

Law enforcement may rely on indirect indicators such as payment timing, communication context, and location history to infer intent. 

However, the statute requires proof of sexual intent rather than mere presence or lawful financial exchange. 

The defense established that the client’s visits were conducted for lawful consumer feedback research related to product usability and market response. 

Documentation demonstrated the client’s professional role, research protocols, and non sexual objectives. 

Payment records were categorized as research stipends rather than compensation for sexual services. 

The attorney prepared the client for common investigatory questions designed to elicit implied admissions. 

Statements were carefully structured to remain accurate while avoiding terminology that could be misconstrued under § 22-2701. 

The timing and order of documentary disclosure were strategically planned to support credibility. 

Counsel clarified that monetary exchanges were unrelated to sexual activity and that no physical or sexual contact occurred. 

Investigators were reminded of the statutory requirement of proving sexual intent beyond circumstantial presence. Following the interview, no arrest was made and the matter was closed without further action.