Skip to main content
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

Case Results

Based on our recently accumulated litigation database, we provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

Permanent Residence Approved in New York | NIW Petition Granted for Humanities-Based Consultant and Startup CEO



This case study highlights a successful National Interest Waiver (NIW) approval leading to Permanent Residence for a seasoned consultant and startup CEO based in New York.

Traditionally, NIW beneficiaries were predominantly drawn from STEM fields where publications, patents, and awards provided tangible evidence. 

However, following the landmark Matter of Dhanasar decision, the scope of Permanent Residence eligibility through NIW has expanded significantly into the humanities, social sciences, and business sectors.

This New York case demonstrates how extensive professional experience, leadership impact, and national economic contribution can outweigh the absence of academic publications. 

It underscores that Permanent Residence through NIW is attainable for non-STEM professionals when their work aligns with U.S. national interest and is presented strategically.

contents


1. Permanent Residence New York – Evolving NIW Standards After Dhanasar


This section explains how the legal framework for Permanent Residence through NIW has evolved in New York following the Dhanasar precedent

The shift moved adjudication away from rigid credential-based evaluation toward a more holistic assessment of impact and merit

This evolution has opened new pathways for professionals outside traditional scientific disciplines.



Expansion Beyond STEM Fields


Before Dhanasar, NIW approvals for Permanent Residence were largely limited to applicants in engineering, science, and technology, where objective evidence such as peer-reviewed papers and patents was readily available. 

Humanities and business professionals often faced higher denial rates due to difficulties in quantifying their contributions. 

In New York, this landscape has changed significantly.

Under the Dhanasar framework, USCIS now evaluates whether the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, whether the applicant is well positioned to advance the endeavor, and whether waiving the job offer requirement benefits the United States

This flexible analysis has allowed Permanent Residence approvals for consultants, executives, and strategists whose work drives economic growth and innovation.



Business and Consulting Roles as National Interest


In this case, the applicant’s consulting and executive leadership activities were framed as directly contributing to U.S. economic competitiveness

Rather than focusing on academic output, the petition emphasized market expansion, organizational efficiency, and strategic decision-making

These elements were presented as nationally significant under New York’s dynamic business environment.

By aligning business leadership with national economic objectives, the petition successfully demonstrated eligibility for Permanent Residence without reliance on traditional scholarly metrics.



2. Permanent Residence New York – Applicant Profile and Professional Background


This section outlines the applicant’s background and explains why their career trajectory supported Permanent Residence through NIW. 

Despite holding only a bachelor’s degree, the applicant’s professional history demonstrated exceptional ability and sustained impact

Careful presentation of these facts was critical.



Extensive Career Experience and Leadership


The applicant held a bachelor’s degree in a humanities-related field but possessed approximately 27 years of professional experience

Over nearly three decades, the applicant served in key roles at prominent companies, contributing to high-level strategy, operational reform, and organizational growth. 

This depth of experience was central to establishing eligibility for Permanent Residence.

At the time of filing, the applicant was serving as the CEO of a startup company

In this role, the applicant was responsible for business development, market analysis, and executive decision-making, all of which were framed as advancing U.S. economic interests in New York and beyond.



Absence of Traditional Academic Evidence


Unlike many NIW applicants, the individual had no academic publications, patents, or formal research output

This absence often poses challenges in Permanent Residence cases. 

However, the petition substituted traditional evidence with detailed documentation of completed projects, leadership outcomes, and measurable business results.

Project portfolios, professional references, and organizational impact reports were used to demonstrate sustained excellence

This approach reflected the practical reality of high-level consultants and executives whose influence is measured through outcomes rather than publications.



3. Permanent Residence New York – Petition Strategy and Case Preparation


Permanent Residence New York – Petition Strategy and Case Preparation


This section focuses on how the NIW petition was strategically structured to secure Permanent Residence approval in a short timeframe

The success of the case hinged on close collaboration and precise legal framing.



Strategic Evidence Compilation


Given the lack of conventional academic evidence, the petition relied heavily on alternative proof

This included detailed descriptions of consulting engagements, leadership roles, and business outcomes achieved over the applicant’s career. 

Each piece of evidence was selected to reinforce eligibility for Permanent Residence under the Dhanasar criteria.

The legal team worked closely with the applicant to extract relevant details from decades of experience. 

This collaboration ensured that the evidence presented was both credible and persuasive, even in the absence of scholarly documentation.



Concise and Persuasive Legal Argumentation


A critical component of the case was a concise yet forceful legal cover letter

Rather than overwhelming USCIS with excessive materials, the argument clearly connected the applicant’s experience to national interest considerations

This clarity is often decisive in Permanent Residence adjudications.

By focusing on substance over volume, the petition avoided common pitfalls and maintained a coherent narrative.



4. Permanent Residence New York – Timeline, Approval, and Implications


This final section reviews the approval timeline and discusses the broader implications for similar applicants seeking Permanent Residence in New York.



Rapid USCIS Approval Timeline


The NIW petition was filed in mid-June 2023, at which point a priority date was issued. 

By late August 2023, the I-140 petition was fully approved, resulting in a processing time of approximately two months

This expedited outcome is notable in the context of Permanent Residence cases.

Such efficiency reflected the strength of the petition and the clarity of its presentation.



Key Takeaways for Non-STEM Applicants


This case confirms that Permanent Residence through NIW is not limited to scientists or researchers

Professionals in consulting, management, and executive leadership can qualify when their work has demonstrable national importance.

The absence of publications does not preclude approval if impact and positioning are clearly shown.

For applicants in New York and beyond, this case underscores the importance of strategic preparation and experienced legal guidance

Long-term experience, leadership, and real-world results can form a compelling basis for Permanent Residence.

At SJKP, we assist professionals in New York seeking Permanent Residence through NIW, including applicants from business, consulting, humanities, and executive backgrounds

Our team specializes in crafting tailored strategies that highlight national interest impact beyond traditional academic metrics

If you are considering NIW or have questions about eligibility for Permanent Residence, contact SJKP to discuss how we can support your immigration goals.


16 Dec, 2025


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone