Skip to main content
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

Queens Criminal Defense Lawyer Secures No Charge Decision in Investment Fraud



Queens Criminal Defense Lawyer represented a business owner accused of fraud arising from a joint franchise investment dispute in New York.


The case involved substantial capital contributions for a proposed restaurant location that was delayed due to operational and contractual issues.


Through structured factual clarification and evidence-based legal analysis, the investigation concluded without criminal charges.

Contents


1. Queens Criminal Defense Lawyer New York Client Background


Queens Criminal Defense Lawyer New York was consulted by a client operating multiple franchise restaurants who planned to expand through a jointly operated location.


The client proposed a cooperative investment structure to two acquaintances interested in participating in the new venture.



Joint Franchise Investment Arrangement


The client discussed projected opening timelines, anticipated revenue structure, and operational roles with the investors.


Based on these discussions, each investor contributed approximately four million dollars over multiple transfers to fund franchise fees, build-out costs, and initial operations.


At the time of the transfers, no formal partnership agreement had yet been finalized.



Delays and Investor Concerns


Negotiations with the franchisor and property owner took longer than initially expected.


Although the client continued explaining that the project remained active, detailed expenditure reports were not consistently shared.


As delays accumulated, the investors questioned whether the funds were being used as originally explained.



2. Queens Criminal Defense Lawyer New York Defense Strategy


Queens Criminal Defense Lawyer New York focused on whether the circumstances satisfied the elements of criminal fraud under New York Penal Law.


The defense emphasized the distinction between business risk, project delay, and intentional deception.



Establishing the Reality of the Business Project


Evidence was presented showing active negotiations with the franchisor and ongoing site discussions.


These materials demonstrated that the joint operation proposal was not a fictitious scheme but a genuine business effort.


This undermined claims that the investment request was merely a pretext for misappropriation.



Tracing the Use of Investment Funds


Financial records were analyzed to track how the contributed funds were spent.


Bank statements and invoices showed that the money was used for franchise-related expenses rather than personal enrichment.


This objective documentation directly countered allegations of unlawful diversion.



3. Queens Criminal Defense Lawyer New York Investigation Outcome


Queens Criminal Defense Lawyer New York Investigation Outcome

 

Queens Criminal Defense Lawyer New York submitted a comprehensive evidentiary package during the investigative stage.


Authorities reviewed both the business preparation records and the financial flow of funds.



No-Charge Determination


Investigators concluded that the facts did not support a finding of deceptive intent at the time of investment.


The dispute was determined to stem from unmet expectations and business delays rather than criminal fraud.


As a result, the case was closed without referral for prosecution.



4. Queens Criminal Defense Lawyer New York Legal Standards for Fraud


Queens Criminal Defense Lawyer New York advises that fraud requires proof of intentional misrepresentation that induces a financial transfer.


Project failure or delayed execution alone does not satisfy criminal liability standards.



Fraud Elements Under New York Law


Prosecutors must establish false representation, reliance, and intent to defraud at the time of the transaction.


Subsequent changes in circumstances are evaluated separately from original intent.


Absent proof of deception at inception, criminal charges are unlikely to succeed.



Practical Guidance for Investment Disputes


Individuals engaged in joint ventures should document communications and expenditures carefully.


When criminal allegations arise from business disagreements, early legal analysis is essential.


Prompt representation can prevent civil disputes from escalating into criminal proceedings.



How SJKP Assists in Investment-Related Criminal Allegations


SJKP provides strategic defense for clients facing fraud accusations tied to business transactions.


The firm evaluates intent, fund usage, and project legitimacy under New York law.


Through early intervention and structured evidence presentation, SJKP works to resolve matters before charges are filed.

 

If you are facing criminal allegations connected to an investment or business venture, SJKP can assess your situation under New York fraud standards.


Early legal guidance often determines whether a case proceeds criminally or is resolved at the investigative stage.


To discuss your matter, request a confidential consultation with a Queens Criminal Defense Lawyer.


19 Jan, 2026


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Related practices


Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone