Skip to main content
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

Case Results

Based on our recently accumulated litigation database, we provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

Successful Sexual Assault Defence



This case study examines how a sexual assault defense attorney in New York successfully defended a client who was reported for alleged forcible touching after a night of heavy drinking. 

 

The client had spent the evening with friends, later visiting a friend’s home while intoxicated and unable to fully recall the events.


The next morning, the client learned that a police report had been filed accusing him of inappropriate touching. 

 

The allegation originated from the friend’s younger sibling, who claimed that the client touched their arm in a sexual manner. 

 

The client maintained that he never engaged in any sexual act and that the contact occurred naturally during a conversation.


Through swift legal intervention and evidence-based advocacy, the sexual assault defense attorney secured a non-referral decision, preventing criminal charges and safeguarding the client’s personal and professional future.

contents


1. Initial Case Review and Fact Assessment


Sexual Assault Defense Attorney New York – Initial Case Review and Fact Assessment

At the initial stage, the sexual assault defense attorney conducted a comprehensive factual review to determine whether the alleged conduct met the legal threshold for forcible touching under New York Penal Law.


This review focused on context, intent, and the credibility of available statements.



Clarifying the Nature of Physical Contact


The attorney examined the complainant’s statement and compared it with the client’s recollection.


A sexual assault defense attorney emphasized the legal requirement that forcible touching must involve intent to gratify sexual desire or degrade another person.


The contact described—grabbing an arm during conversation—did not satisfy this standard.


The absence of any sexualized behavior, gestures, or statements further weakened the allegation.


This distinction became central to disproving the accusation.



Evaluating Intoxication and Memory Gaps


Because the client was heavily intoxicated on the night of the event, the attorney analyzed whether impaired memory could affect the accuracy of both accounts.


A sexual assault defense attorney reviewed the timeline of events, witness locations, and statements from individuals present at the gathering.


Multiple witnesses confirmed that nothing inappropriate occurred.


These testimonies reinforced the client’s credibility.


The evidence established a consistent narrative refuting any sexual intent.



2. Evidence Development and Legal Framework


After establishing initial facts, the sexual assault defense attorney gathered objective evidence to demonstrate the absence of criminal conduct.


This step was necessary because prosecutors in New York require clear evidence of intent for sexual offense charges.



Gathering Supporting Witness Statements


The attorney carefully interviewed individuals who were present before and after the alleged incident.


A sexual assault defense attorney documented each witness account, ensuring consistency in describing the client’s behavior.


Several witnesses confirmed that the interaction was limited to casual conversation.


No behavior suggested coercion or inappropriate touching.


These accounts played a significant role in disproving the allegation.



Legal Analysis of Forcible Touching Requirements


New York Penal Law defines forcible touching as intentional sexual contact without consent.


A sexual assault defense attorney compared statutory requirements with the factual timeline.


The alleged contact lacked the intent element, which is essential for prosecutorial referral.


The attorney presented this legal analysis in a structured, evidence-based manner.


This reasoning was crucial in persuading investigators.



3. Advocacy Before Investigators


With evidence assembled, the sexual assault defense attorney prepared formal submissions to law enforcement.


The goal was to demonstrate clearly that the case lacked both legal and factual grounds for referral.



Preparing a Detailed Explanatory Statement


The attorney drafted a comprehensive statement outlining the facts.


A sexual assault defense attorney highlighted inconsistencies in the complainant’s account and explained the natural context of the arm contact.


The submission included diagrams and timelines to reinforce clarity.


The structured presentation ensured authorities understood the sequence of events.


This increased the likelihood of a favorable decision.



Addressing Potential Misinterpretations


The attorney proactively addressed concerns that intoxication may have affected perceptions.


A sexual assault defense attorney clarified that intoxication alone cannot imply wrongdoing.


The argument emphasized that physical gestures made while conversing are not inherently sexual.


Investigators acknowledged these distinctions.


This helped prevent escalation to prosecution.



4. Final Decision and Client Outcome


Following a thorough review, investigators issued a non-referral decision.


This outcome confirmed that the elements required for a sexual offense charge were not met and cleared the client of suspicion.



Restoring the Client’s Stability and Reputation


The resolution relieved the client from potential criminal exposure.


A sexual assault defense attorney advised the client on preserving evidence and maintaining appropriate boundaries.


The client resumed normal personal and professional activities without stigma.


No record was created that could affect background checks.


This ensured long-term protection of the client’s reputation.
 



Lessons for Individuals Facing Similar Allegations


Cases involving intoxication and misinterpreted gestures often depend heavily on context.


A sexual assault defense attorney stressed the importance of legal counsel from the earliest stage.


Early intervention can prevent misunderstandings from escalating into charges.


Individuals should avoid making personal explanations before consulting an attorney.


This case shows the power of timely legal representation.


21 Nov, 2025


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone