Skip to main content
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

Case Results

Based on our recently accumulated litigation database, we provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

Subcontract Payment | Defending a Developer in a New York Construction Dispute



A mid sized real estate development company in New York sought our firm’s assistance after facing a $700,000 Subcontract Payment demand from a service provider involved in a mixed-use residential development project. 

The plaintiff argued that all services were fully completed and that payment was therefore immediately due.

However, the underlying project finance structure was governed by a strict contractual condition precedent, requiring the exhaustion and reconciliation of senior project costs namely construction expenses and development fees before any lower-tier Subcontract Payment obligation could arise. 

The developer feared that if the court accepted the subcontractor’s position without analyzing the fund flow waterfall, the company would face significant operational and financial consequences.

Our litigation team analyzed the project documents, the funding structure, and New York contract law, ultimately demonstrating that the plaintiff’s claim failed because the condition precedent to Subcontract Payment had not yet occurred.

contents


1. Subcontract Payment in New York – Understanding the Developer’s Position in a Complex Finance Structure


The developer’s primary concern was whether a New York court would enforce the contractual payment waterfall as a true condition precedent to Subcontract Payment.

In large residential projects, lenders often control disbursements through a project-level fund administrator, meaning the developer cannot release subordinate payments until senior obligations are fully funded.



Contractual Condition Precedent to Payment


The contract expressly stated that Subcontract Payment to the service provider would occur only after all senior project costs were reconciled.

Under New York law, when a contract clearly defines a payment step as a condition precedent, courts generally enforce it strictly.

This principle mirrors long-standing precedent holding that a subcontractor’s right to payment does not arise unless and until the parties’ agreed sequence of disbursements is satisfied.

The fund administrator, acting similarly to a construction escrow agent, had not yet completed reconciliation, meaning the condition precedent had not been met.



Financial Records and Fund Flow Analysis


Our team examined draw requests, lender disbursement schedules, and reconciliation reports to confirm that senior obligations were still outstanding.

We prepared a structured fund-flow chart demonstrating that:

• lender-controlled disbursements were ongoing
• senior costs had not yet been exhausted
• no surplus funds existed for subordinate Subcontract Payment

This evidence established that the subcontractor’s claim was premature as a matter of New York law.



2. Subcontract Payment in New York – Legal Strategy and Defense Framework


Once the finance structure was clarified, our firm built a comprehensive defense emphasizing enforceability of the condition precedent and the plaintiff’s burden of proof.



Enforceability of Pay-If-Paid Clauses Under New York Law


Although New York disfavors clauses that permanently bar subcontractor recovery, it does permit payment timing clauses that create valid conditions precedent when drafted unambiguously.

Here, the clause did not remove the subcontractor’s rights but defined when those rights arise.

We highlighted multiple cases upholding such clauses linked to lender disbursements and project-finance mechanics.



Burden of Proof on the Claimant


Under New York law, the subcontractor must prove that all conditions precedent have occurred.

We argued the plaintiff:

• failed to show reconciliation of senior costs
• used incomplete accounting records
• could not demonstrate surplus funds

This shifted the litigation posture decisively to the developer.



3. Subcontract Payment in New York – Contract Validity and Document Review


Subcontract Payment in New York – Contract Validity and Document Review

 

We also reviewed execution and internal approvals for additional defenses.



Verification of Corporate Authority and Internal Approvals


The subcontractor’s documentation contained authorization defects, enabling us to question the enforceability of the asserted obligations.



Comprehensive Review of Project Agreements


We synchronized the development, construction management, and service contracts to show clear intent for a hierarchical fund flow structure, further supporting that Subcontract Payment was subordinate to senior costs.



4. Subcontract Payment in New York – Final Outcome and Legal Significance


The court accepted our argument and held that the subcontractor failed to satisfy the condition precedent.

Because reconciliation was still in progress, the $700,000 Subcontract Payment demand was dismissed.



New York Contract Law and Timing of Payment Obligations


New York law requires strict enforcement of conditions precedent when expressly stated.

This ruling reaffirmed that Subcontract Payment obligations tied to structured fund-flow mechanisms do not arise until senior obligations are completed.



SJKP’s Construction Litigation Support


This case shows the importance of understanding how New York contract law interacts with project finance mechanics and Subcontract Payment timing.

SJKP supports clients with:

• contract drafting
• construction litigation
• fund-flow analysis
• disputes involving conditions precedent

If your organization faces Subcontract Payment issues in New York, SJKP is ready to assist.


26 Nov, 2025


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone