Tn Visa Lawyer Washington D.C. Uscis Approval after Denials

The applicant initially pursued TN admission directly at the port of entry, relying on a concise offer letter and academic credentials.

However, CBP officers questioned whether the consulting role constituted hands on operational management rather than advisory services, leading to repeated denials without formal written findings.

Each refusal compounded the risk of future scrutiny, even though no finding of fraud or misrepresentation was made.

Under federal law, a management consultant must provide independent advisory services rather than fill a regular staff position.

The TN visa lawyer restructured the legal narrative to emphasize project based consulting, strategic analysis, and deliverable driven outcomes, fully aligning the role with regulatory expectations.

This reframing was essential to distinguish the position from employment categories that fall outside TN eligibility.

The petition included a detailed employer support letter, consulting agreement, project timelines, and expert legal analysis explaining TN eligibility.

Each document was prepared to demonstrate compliance with 8 C.F.R. §214.6(b) regarding professional qualifications and the temporary nature of the assignment.

The structured submission eliminated ambiguity and reduced discretionary variance.

This case demonstrates that repeated CBP denials often reflect procedural issues rather than substantive ineligibility.

A TN visa lawyer can play a decisive role by selecting the appropriate adjudication forum and presenting the case under the correct federal legal framework.

For professionals in Washington, D.C., USCIS filing may offer a more reliable pathway than continued border applications.