Skip to main content

call now

  • About
  • lawyers
  • practices
  • Insights
  • Case Results
  • Locations
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

AccessibilityCookie StatementDisclaimersLegal NoticePrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
BROCHURE DOWNLOAD

U.S.

New York
Washington, D.C.

Asia

Seoul
Busan
BROCHURE DOWNLOAD

© 2025 SJKP, LLP
All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

BROCHURE DOWNLOAD
Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone

  1. Home
  2. Violent Offense | Defense Strategy for Client Wrongfully Charged With a Violent Club Incident

Case Results

Based on our recently accumulated litigation database, we provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

Violent Offense | Defense Strategy for Client Wrongfully Charged With a Violent Club Incident



When someone is accused of a violent act in a crowded nightlife setting, determining what truly happened can be challenging. In this case, a violent offense accusation arose after the client, while drinking at a club, threw a bottle without intending to strike anyone. 

Hours later, the client was confronted with an unexpected allegation that he had assaulted a patron inside the club. 

A skilled defense was urgently needed to prevent the violent offense charge from progressing into a wrongful conviction.

New York Penal Law requires prosecutors to prove that the defendant caused physical injury with intent or reckless disregard. 

However, the mere act of throwing an object without proof of impact or injury is not enough. 

With the assistance of SJKP, the client challenged the prosecution’s assumptions and demonstrated that no evidence connected the bottle-throwing incident to any actual harm.

Thanks to this deeply strategic defense, the client ultimately received a full acquittal.

contents


1. Violent Offense | Evaluating the Initial Allegation and Lack of Direct Evidence


To defend against a violent offense allegation, the first step is assessing the circumstances that led to the accusation. 

SJKP examined the timeline, club environment, and the absence of eyewitness clarity. 

Without proof that the bottle struck any individual, the violent offense charge had no factual foundation.



Analyzing the Timeline and Witness Reliability


Nightclub environments often produce conflicting recollections. 

SJKP focused on inconsistencies among witness statements and the lack of direct observation of impact.

The defense argued that no one saw the bottle strike a person only that a bottle was throwninto a crowded space. 

This gap in evidence is crucial in countering a violent offense charge because guilt requires a clear causal link between the defendant’s action and the alleged injury.



Highlighting the Absence of Physical Injury Evidence


Investigators could not produce medical records or verified injuries tied to the incident. SJKP demonstrated that the accusation rested solely on speculation rather than proof. 

Since New York courts require concrete evidence of bodily harmto support a violent offense prosecution, the absence of injury severely weakened the case.

This reinforced the argument that no criminal assault occurred.



2. Violent Offense | Building a Defense Based on Reasonable Doubt


A strong violent offense defense relies on creating reasonable doubt about intent, causation, and impact. 

SJKP constructed a clear narrative showing that the client’s actions, while careless, did not constitute an intentional assault under the law. 

Without proof of contact or injury, the charge lacked the essential elements required for conviction.



Reconstructing the Scene and Bottle Trajectory


To undermine the prosecution’s theory, SJKP evaluated the physical layout of the club, lighting conditions, and crowd density. 

The defense emphasized that it was impossible to trace the bottle’s path or determine where it landed. 

This uncertainty made it impossible to meet the burden of proof for a violent offense, as the prosecution could not link the client’s action to any specific harm.



Demonstrating Lack of Criminal Intent


SJKP further argued that the client’s act was reckless at worst, but not intentional.

Under New York law, intentional harm is a key element of a violent offense. 

The defense highlighted the client’s cooperation, lack of prior incidents, and absence of motive, helping the court understand that the situation was a momentary lapse, not a criminal attack.



3. Violent Offense | Courtroom Advocacy and Evidence Challenges


In court, SJKP directly challenged the prosecution’s reliance on assumptions rather than factual evidence.

For a violent offense case, the prosecutor must present clear, credible proof of injury, identity, and impact. 

SJKP emphasized that the case failed to meet all of these requirements.



Exposing Weaknesses in the Prosecution’s Presentation


During cross-examination, SJKP highlighted contradictory statements and the absence of any witness who actually observed an assault. 

The prosecution relied on hearsay and conjecture rather than direct evidence. 

SJKP argued that no reasonable jury could convict on such an unstable foundation in a violent offense matter.



Achieving Complete Acquittal


Given the lack of impact evidence and the speculative nature of the allegations, the court concluded that the prosecution failed to satisfy the burden of proof.

SJKP’s meticulous preparation and strategic courtroom performance secured the client’s full acquittal. 

The ruling affirmed that suspicion cannot substitute for evidence in violent offense prosecutions.



4. Violent Offense | SJKP’s Support for Clients Facing High-Stakes Allegations


Violent Offense | SJKP’s Support for Clients Facing High-Stakes Allegations

 

Through SJKP’s defense strategy, the client avoided a wrongful conviction and the long-term consequences of a violent offense record. 

If you are facing similar accusations or need experienced legal protection in high-pressure criminal matters, SJKP provides comprehensive investigation, defense planning, and courtroom advocacy. 

Contact SJKP today for tailored representationthat protects your rights and builds the strongest defense possible.


Related lawyers

Donghoo Sohn attorney profile photo

Donghoo Sohn

Associate

New york

Corporate

Will & Trust

Immigration

Real Estate

Related practices


Criminal Evidence

20 Nov, 2025


Older Posts

view list

Newer Posts

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Related lawyers

Donghoo Sohn attorney profile photo

Donghoo Sohn

Associate

New york

Corporate

Will & Trust

Immigration

Real Estate

Related practices


Criminal Evidence

contents

  • False Report Defense Result in Washington D.C. | Employee Accused of Fabricating an Assault Claim

  • Personal Injury Attorney New York Defense of a Client Accused of Assault and Obstruction of Governmental Administration

  • Sentencing for Aggravated Robbery: How Our Defense Team Secured a Favorable Outcome in New York

  • Criminal Defense Law Firm in Washington D.C. | Successful Defense in a Corporate Embezzlement Allegation