Skip to main content
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

Insights

A curated collection of observations, industry developments, and firm perspectives on legal trends and business issues. These materials are provided for general informational and educational purposes only and are not legal advice. For guidance tailored to your specific situation, please contact our attorneys.

Construction Payment: Navigating Disputes and Legal Noncompliance

Author : Donghoo Sohn, Esq.



Construction payment disputes represent a significant threat to the financial stability of contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers operating in the highly competitive New York market. When services are rendered and materials are delivered according to a valid contract, the expectation of timely compensation is a fundamental legal right. However, noncompliance with payment schedules often necessitates professional intervention to recover owed funds. This guide examines the statutory protections available under the New York Lien Law, the procedural requirements for civil recovery, and the strategic advantages of professional advisory services in securing a business's financial legacy.

contents


1. construction payment New York: Statutory Definitions and Trust Fund Protections


In the jurisdiction of New York, a construction payment is not merely a contractual obligation but is often protected by specific statutory trusts created under the Lien Law. Article 3 A of the New York Lien Law establishes that funds received by an owner for a construction project, or by a contractor from an owner, are held in trust for the benefit of those who provided labor and materials. This legal framework is designed to prevent the diversion of project funds to unrelated expenses, ensuring that those who contribute to the improvement of real property are the first to be compensated. Failure to adhere to these trust requirements can lead to severe personal liability for corporate officers who misappropriate these protected funds.



Identifying Noncompliance and Trust Fund Diversion


The issue of noncompliance occurs when an entity responsible for a construction payment fails to distribute funds in a timely manner despite having received payment for the work performed. Under New York law, the rule is that any diversion of trust funds for a purpose other than paying for the costs of the improvement is a breach of fiduciary duty. In application, if a developer uses funds intended for a specific site to pay debts on a different project, they have committed a violation of the Lien Law. The conclusion is that contractors must be vigilant in monitoring project funding and demanding transparency to ensure their right to compensation is preserved through these fiduciary protections.



2. construction payment New York: Mechanic's Liens and Property Claims


One of the most powerful tools for securing a construction payment in New York is the filing of a mechanic’s lien against the real property where the work was performed. This legal claim attaches directly to the land and buildings, effectively preventing the owner from selling or refinancing the property without first addressing the debt. For commercial projects, the lien must be filed within eight months of the last day labor was provided or materials were delivered. This procedural deadline is strictly enforced by the courts, and missing it can permanently waive a contractor’s right to this specific form of security. Consequently, immediate action is required the moment a payment delay is identified.



Filing Requirements and Foreclosure Actions


To establish a valid claim, a contractor must provide a detailed itemization of the labor and materials that justify the requested construction payment amount. The application of the Lien Law requires that the notice of lien be served on the property owner and filed with the County Clerk in the county where the property is located. If the owner refuses to pay, the lienor can initiate a foreclosure action to have the property sold to satisfy the debt. This mechanism provides immense leverage, as it directly impacts the owner’s equity and creditworthiness. For those involved in Construction projects, maintaining meticulous daily logs and invoices is essential to substantiate these claims in court.



3. construction payment New York: Civil Litigation and Judgment Enforcement


When a mechanic’s lien is insufficient or unavailable, pursuing a civil lawsuit for a construction payment becomes the primary method of recovery. These actions are typically brought as a Breach of Contract claim under the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR). A plaintiff must demonstrate the existence of a valid agreement, performance of the work, and the defendant's failure to pay as promised. While litigation can be complex, New York courts offer various summary proceedings for cases where the evidence of nonpayment is clear and undisputed. Strategic use of these procedures can lead to a faster judgment and a more efficient recovery of capital.



Defense Mitigation and Asset Recovery


The core issue in litigation is often the defendant’s attempt to justify a withheld construction payment by citing minor defects or delays. The legal rule in New York follows the doctrine of substantial performance, where a contractor is entitled to the contract price minus any actual damages caused by minor deviations. In application, legal counsel presents expert testimony and project records to prove the work met industry standards, thereby nullifying the debtor’s excuses. Once a judgment is obtained, enforcement through CPLR Article 52 allows for the seizure of bank accounts or the garnishment of business revenue. This aggressive Litigation strategy ensures that a court order is transformed into actual liquid funds for the business.



4. construction payment New York: Professional Advisory and Strategic Prevention


Professional legal advisory is the most effective way to prevent a construction payment dispute before it reaches the courtroom. By drafting robust contracts that include clear progress payment schedules, interest for late payments, and attorneys’ fees clauses, businesses can deter noncompliance from the outset. In New York, these proactive measures shift the risk back to the paying party and provide a clear roadmap for resolving disagreements without a total work stoppage. Continuous review of contract terms ensures that the business remains compliant with the Prompt Payment Act, which mandates specific timelines for payments on both private and public projects.



Risk Mitigation Through Robust Agreements


The primary issue in many payment failures is the lack of a detailed written agreement defining the scope of the construction payment obligations. The rule of law in New York emphasizes that clear, unambiguous terms will be enforced as written, regardless of oral promises made at the site. Applying this to a commercial setting, a subcontractor who includes a "pay when paid" clause might find their recovery delayed, whereas a stronger clause would guarantee payment regardless of the owner’s actions. The conclusion is that investing in professional contract review minimizes exposure to bad debt and establishes a professional standard of operation. This foresight is critical for the long term growth and stability of any firm involved in the New York building industry.


02 Jul, 2025


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone