Skip to main content
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

Insights

A curated collection of observations, industry developments, and firm perspectives on legal trends and business issues. These materials are provided for general informational and educational purposes only and are not legal advice. For guidance tailored to your specific situation, please contact our attorneys.

How is Identity Theft Using Government-Issued ID Defined?

Author : Scarlett Choi, Of Counsel



Identity theft involving official identification, such as a D.C. driver’s license or state-issued identification card, is treated as a serious criminal matter in Washington, D.C. The unauthorized use of these credentials — whether physical, digital, or photographic — may result in significant criminal penalties and long-term legal consequences. This article explains the applicable legal standards, common identity theft scenarios involving government-issued IDs, and how to report or defend against identity theft allegations under District of Columbia law.

contents


1. Washington D.C. Identity Theft: Definitions and Scenarios of Identity Theft


In Washington, D.C., identity theft involving a government-issued ID generally refers to knowingly using another person’s identifying information, without authorization, with intent to defraud, obtain benefits, or impersonate another individual. This conduct may include applying for services, accessing accounts, or falsely presenting oneself as another person in public or private transactions. Under the D.C. Code, criminal liability arises from the fraudulent use of identifying information, rather than mere possession of a government-issued document.



Recognized Government-Issued ID Types Used in Identity Theft


The following documents are considered valid government-issued IDs under D.C. law, and their misuse is central to charges of Identity Theft:

  • D.C. Driver’s License or Non-Driver ID Card
  • U.S. Passport
  • Green Card (Permanent Resident Card)
  • Employment Authorization Document (EAD)
  • Real ID-compliant State IDs
  • Federally recognized Tribal IDs
  • Digital IDs authorized by the D.C. DMV (e.g., mobile credentials)

Misuse of a copy, scanned image, or digital screenshot of any of the above may result in criminal charges when it is used with fraudulent intent. Under D.C. law, the focus is on the unlawful use of identifying information rather than the physical format of the document itself.



2. Washington D.C. Identity Theft: Charges and Maximum Penalties


Identity-related crimes are prosecuted under various provisions of the D.C. Code, and in some cases, under federal statutes, with penalties reflecting the severity and extent of the fraudulent use of the ID. Below is a summary of offenses and their corresponding penalties, highlighting the harsh consequences for those convicted of Identity Theft:

Violation TypeStatutory ReferenceMaximum Penalty
Basic Identity Theft (first offense)D.C. Code § 22-3227.02Up to 10 years in prison
Using ID to open a mobile phone or utility account (telecom fraud)D.C. Code § 22-3221 et seq.Up to 3 years in prison and/or $10,000 fine
Using ID in investment or loan fraud exceeding $50,000Federal wire fraud / 18 U.S.C. § 1343Up to 20 years in prison

These laws are strictly enforced, especially when financial harm, elderly targeting, or repeat offenses involving Identity Theft are involved. In certain circumstances, charges under the Identity Theft Penalty Enhancement Act may apply, adding significant sentencing enhancements to the standard penalties.



3. Washington D.C. Victim Response: What to Do If Your ID is Misused in Identity Theft


Victims of Identity Theft in D.C. are encouraged to act promptly to prevent further misuse and begin the recovery process, as swift action is crucial for mitigating the damage. Taking immediate steps to invalidate the stolen identification and notify relevant authorities is vital to protecting the victim’s financial and personal standing after an act of Identity Theft Using Government IDs.



Quick Actions to Report and Recover from Identity Theft


  • Report to DMV: File an official lost/stolen ID report with the D.C. Department of Motor Vehicles; this is the first step to invalidate the stolen ID and triggers monitoring related to the reported Identity Theft.
  • Police Notification: Visit your local police station or file an online report through the Metropolitan Police Department's portal to create a formal record of the Identity Theft incident.
  • Federal Reporting: Submit an Identity Theft report via IdentityTheft.gov to receive a personalized recovery plan and tracking assistance.
  • Credit Freeze: Contact Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion immediately to place a fraud alert or fully freeze your credit to prevent unauthorized accounts from being opened due to the Identity Theft.
  • Contact Banks and Service Providers: Notify financial institutions, telecom carriers, and utility companies to block unauthorized activity and require identity re-verification to prevent further financial harm from the Identity Theft.
  • Track New Account Activity: Use ID monitoring tools to flag unauthorized activity across various sectors, which can alert you to ongoing attempts at Identity Theft and misuse of your identity.

Quick action can reduce the extent of the damage from Identity Theft and improve your chances of prosecuting the offender successfully, offering the best path toward recovery.



4. Washington D.C. Legal Defense: Defense Strategies Against Identity Theft Charges


If you are accused of Identity Theft or misuse of a government-issued ID, there are strategic defenses and legal considerations that may apply depending on your intent and actions. Navigating these charges requires a deep understanding of D.C. law and a focused defense strategy to mitigate the severe penalties associated with Identity Theft Using Government IDs.



Available Mitigation Options for Identity Theft Cases


Having a qualified criminal defense attorney can significantly influence the outcome of your Identity Theft case, including plea negotiations and court representation.

  • Voluntary Admission: If you disclose the incident before being investigated and show cooperation, authorities may consider reduced penalties or diversion programs for the alleged Identity Theft.
  • No Financial Gain: If the ID was used for non-commercial purposes (e.g., to access age-restricted venues or verify identity on social media), this may be weighed during sentencing as it suggests the motivation was not financial profit from Identity Theft.
  • Victim Reconciliation: Offering to compensate or apologize to the harmed party often helps avoid felony charges or jail time, demonstrating remorse over the act of Identity Theft.
  • Lack of Criminal Intent: Misuse of a close relative’s ID or mistaken use under genuine confusion could be raised as mitigating evidence that the intent required for a conviction of Identity Theft was absent.
  • First-Time Offender Programs: D.C. courts may approve probationary terms or counseling in lieu of incarceration for those with no prior convictions, offering an alternative path for individuals charged with Identity Theft.

11 Jul, 2025


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone