Skip to main content

International Dispute Resolution : Legal Process

Author : Donghoo Sohn, Esq.



International dispute resolution encompasses the mechanisms and procedures used to resolve conflicts between parties across borders, including arbitration, mediation, and litigation. In New York, businesses and individuals increasingly face complex disputes involving international parties, requiring specialized legal expertise. Understanding the available options for resolving these disputes efficiently and cost effectively is essential for protecting your interests in a globalized economy.

Dispute Resolution MethodKey CharacteristicsBest Use Cases
International ArbitrationBinding decision by neutral arbitrators; enforceable under New York ConventionCommercial contracts; cross border transactions
MediationFacilitated negotiation; non binding; confidential processBusiness disputes; relationship preservation
LitigationCourt proceedings; binding judgment; formal discoveryComplex legal issues; precedent needed
Expert DeterminationTechnical expert resolves specific issues; faster than arbitrationTechnical or valuation disputes

When facing an international dispute, selecting the appropriate resolution method is critical to achieving a favorable outcome while managing costs and timelines. International dispute resolution in New York benefits from the state's recognition of the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, which facilitates enforcement of arbitration decisions across more than 170 countries. This legal framework makes New York an attractive forum for resolving international commercial conflicts. The choice between arbitration, mediation, and litigation depends on factors including the nature of the dispute, the parties involved, contractual provisions, and desired outcomes such as confidentiality or precedent.

Contents


1. International Dispute Resolution in New York : Arbitration Framework


Arbitration is a widely used method for resolving international disputes, offering flexibility and confidentiality compared to traditional litigation. In New York, arbitration is governed by the Federal Arbitration Act and state law, providing a robust legal framework for enforcing arbitration agreements and awards. Many international commercial contracts include arbitration clauses that require parties to submit disputes to arbitration rather than pursuing court litigation.



Arbitration Agreement and Enforceability


An arbitration agreement is a binding contract between parties to resolve disputes through arbitration instead of litigation. New York courts strongly favor arbitration agreements and will enforce them even when one party later seeks to litigate. The enforceability of arbitration clauses is protected under federal law, making arbitration a reliable mechanism for international dispute resolution. Parties can select the arbitration rules, location, and arbitrators, allowing for customization based on their specific needs and preferences.



Arbitral Award Recognition and Enforcement


One of the primary advantages of international arbitration is the enforceability of arbitral awards under the New York Convention. An arbitral award rendered in one country can be recognized and enforced in another country that is party to the Convention, which includes most major trading nations. This international enforceability makes arbitration particularly valuable for cross border transactions where parties need confidence that a decision will be enforceable regardless of where assets are located.



2. International Dispute Resolution in New York : Mediation and Negotiation


Mediation offers a collaborative approach to international dispute resolution, allowing parties to work toward mutually acceptable solutions with the assistance of a neutral mediator. This method is less adversarial than arbitration or litigation and often preserves business relationships, which is particularly important in ongoing international commercial relationships. Mediation can be faster and more cost effective than formal proceedings, making it an attractive option for parties seeking to resolve disputes efficiently.



Mediation Process and Confidentiality


During mediation, a neutral third party facilitates discussions between disputing parties to help them reach a settlement agreement. Mediation is confidential, meaning statements made during the process generally cannot be used in subsequent litigation or arbitration. This confidentiality encourages candid communication and creative problem solving. If mediation does not result in settlement, parties retain the right to pursue arbitration or litigation, making mediation a low risk first step in international dispute resolution.



Settlement Agreements and Enforcement


When parties reach agreement through mediation or negotiation, they execute a settlement agreement that binds both parties to the agreed terms. Settlement agreements can be enforced through contract law, and breaches can result in legal action. Parties may also agree to include dispute resolution clauses in settlement agreements to address any future disagreements about the settlement terms themselves.



3. International Dispute Resolution in New York : Litigation in International Contexts


Litigation in New York courts is an option for resolving international disputes when parties cannot reach agreement through arbitration or mediation. New York courts have experience handling complex international commercial disputes and apply well developed legal principles to international cases. However, litigation is generally more time consuming and costly than alternative dispute resolution methods, and outcomes are less predictable than in arbitration or mediation.



Jurisdiction and Choice of Law


For international disputes in New York courts, jurisdiction must be established over the defendant, and parties must determine which law governs the dispute. New York has developed extensive case law addressing jurisdictional issues in international cases, including personal jurisdiction over foreign defendants and the enforceability of foreign judgments. Choice of law provisions in contracts can specify that New York law applies to disputes, providing clarity and predictability for international parties.



Discovery and Evidence in International Cases


Litigation in New York involves formal discovery procedures where parties exchange documents and witness testimony to build their cases. In international cases, obtaining evidence located outside the United States can be challenging and may require cooperation from foreign authorities. New York courts have developed procedures to manage international discovery issues while protecting the rights of all parties to obtain necessary evidence. Experienced legal counsel familiar with international dispute resolution can navigate these complexities effectively.



4. International Dispute Resolution in New York : Selecting the Right Approach


Choosing the appropriate method for international dispute resolution requires careful analysis of your specific situation, including the nature of the dispute, the parties involved, contractual provisions, and your objectives. International dispute resolution specialists can evaluate your options and recommend the most effective strategy. Factors to consider include cost, timeline, confidentiality requirements, enforceability in relevant jurisdictions, and whether preserving business relationships is important. Proactive planning when entering international commercial relationships by including clear dispute resolution clauses in contracts can prevent costly disputes and provide a roadmap for resolution if conflicts arise.



Cost and Timeline Considerations


Arbitration and mediation typically offer faster resolution and lower costs than litigation, making them attractive for many international disputes. Mediation is often the fastest and least expensive option, while arbitration provides a middle ground between mediation and litigation. Litigation in court can take years to resolve and may involve substantial legal fees. Early engagement with experienced counsel can help identify cost effective dispute resolution strategies tailored to your circumstances and objectives.



Enforceability and Long Term Outcomes


The enforceability of any resolution is critical in international disputes where parties may be located in different countries. Arbitral awards are highly enforceable internationally under the New York Convention, making arbitration particularly valuable for cross border transactions. Settlement agreements are enforceable under contract law in the jurisdictions where parties maintain assets. Dispute resolution counsel experienced in international matters can structure agreements to maximize enforceability and protect your interests across multiple jurisdictions. Understanding the legal framework in relevant countries ensures that any resolution mechanism you select will be effective in protecting your rights and enforcing your rights if needed.


10 Feb, 2026


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone