Skip to main content
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

Logo Infringement: Your Legal Rights and Protections

Author : Donghoo Sohn, Esq.



Logo infringement occurs when a business uses a trademark or logo that is confusingly similar to another company's registered mark without authorization. This unauthorized use can damage brand reputation, confuse consumers, and violate intellectual property rights. Understanding logo infringement laws in New York is essential for protecting your business identity and taking appropriate legal action when your marks are misused. This guide explains the key concepts, relevant laws, and practical steps for addressing logo infringement.

Contents


1. Logo Infringement in New York : Understanding Trademark Rights


Trademark law protects distinctive marks that identify and distinguish goods or services from those of other businesses. A logo qualifies as a trademark when it functions as a source identifier for products or services. Under federal law, trademark rights arise through use in commerce and can be strengthened through registration with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Logo infringement claims typically involve allegations that a defendant's mark creates a likelihood of confusion among consumers regarding the source, sponsorship, or approval of goods or services.


Federal and State Protection Standards


Federal trademark protection is governed by the Lanham Act, codified at 15 U.S.C. § 1127, which establishes the framework for trademark registration and enforcement. The Lanham Act provides remedies including injunctive relief, monetary damages, and destruction of infringing goods. New York State also recognizes common law trademark rights and provides additional protections through state statutes. The New York General Business Law § 368 addresses trademark infringement and unfair competition, offering state-level remedies for businesses whose marks are misused. To establish logo infringement under federal law, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant's use creates a likelihood of confusion regarding the source or sponsorship of goods or services



The Likelihood of Confusion Test


Courts apply a multi-factor test to determine whether logo infringement has occurred. The test examines the strength of the original mark, similarity between the marks, proximity of goods or services, evidence of actual confusion, sophistication of consumers, and the defendant's intent in adopting the similar mark. A registered logo enjoys a presumption of validity and nationwide priority from the registration date. The more distinctive and well-known a logo is, the stronger the protection against similar marks. Even partial similarity can constitute infringement if consumers are likely to be confused about the source of goods or services.



2. Logo Infringement in New York : Common Infringement Scenarios


Logo infringement manifests in various forms, from direct copying to subtle variations designed to capitalize on brand recognition. Counterfeit goods bearing fake logos represent one of the most obvious forms of infringement. Domain name cybersquatting, where individuals register web addresses incorporating famous logos or trademarks, constitutes another common violation. Social media account impersonation and unauthorized use of logos in advertising campaigns also constitute actionable infringement. Understanding these scenarios helps businesses identify when their marks are being misused and when legal intervention becomes necessary.


Digital and Online Infringement


The digital marketplace has created new avenues for logo infringement through e-commerce platforms, social media, and counterfeit online retailers. Unauthorized sellers often use company logos on third-party marketplaces to deceive consumers into purchasing counterfeit or inferior products. Search engine advertising abuse, where competitors bid on branded keywords to display their logos alongside legitimate results, can constitute infringement under certain circumstances. Online platforms like Amazon, eBay, and social media networks provide reporting mechanisms to address logo infringement, but enforcement often requires legal action to obtain complete relief. Businesses must actively monitor their online presence and take swift action when unauthorized logo use is discovered.



Counterfeiting and Physical Goods


Counterfeiting involves manufacturing and distributing goods bearing fake logos that infringe registered trademarks. This activity not only violates trademark law but may also constitute criminal conduct under 18 U.S.C. § 2320. Counterfeit goods damage brand reputation, harm consumer safety, and generate illegal profits for infringers. Customs agencies can seize counterfeit imports at borders, but businesses must provide evidence of registration and trademark ownership. Working with law enforcement and customs officials can help stop the distribution of counterfeit products bearing infringing logos.



3. Logo Infringement in New York : Enforcement and Remedies


When logo infringement occurs, trademark owners have multiple enforcement options available under federal and state law. Cease and desist letters often serve as the first step, formally notifying the infringer of the violation and demanding immediate cessation of use. If informal resolution fails, litigation may become necessary to obtain court-ordered relief. Federal courts have broad authority to issue injunctions preventing further use of infringing logos, award monetary damages including profits and enhanced damages for willful infringement, and order destruction of infringing materials. Understanding these remedies helps businesses make informed decisions about pursuing logo infringement claims.


Injunctive Relief and Court Orders


Preliminary injunctions can halt ongoing infringement while litigation proceeds, preventing further brand damage and consumer confusion. Courts typically grant preliminary injunctions when the trademark owner demonstrates a likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm absent an injunction, and that the balance of equities favors stopping the infringing use. Permanent injunctions issued after trial judgment provide long-term protection by legally prohibiting the defendant from continuing to use the infringing logo. Injunctive relief is often the most valuable remedy because it prevents ongoing harm to brand reputation and market share. Courts may also order the destruction or recall of products bearing infringing logos.



Monetary Damages and Remedies


Trademark owners can recover the infringer's profits attributable to the infringing use, actual damages to the brand owner's business, and reasonable attorney fees in exceptional cases. The Lanham Act permits courts to award enhanced damages up to three times the actual damages in cases of willful infringement. Statutory damages are available in counterfeiting cases, with penalties ranging from ten thousand to one hundred thousand dollars per counterfeit mark per type of goods. These monetary remedies incentivize compliance and compensate businesses for losses resulting from logo infringement. Documenting actual damages through sales records, market research, and brand valuation strengthens damage claims in litigation.



4. Logo Infringement in New York : Proactive Protection Strategies


Preventing logo infringement requires a comprehensive strategy combining registration, monitoring, and enforcement. Registering logos with the United States Patent and Trademark Office provides nationwide priority, constructive notice to potential infringers, and access to federal court remedies. Trademark owners should conduct regular monitoring of commerce, online marketplaces, and domain registrations to identify potential infringing uses. Maintaining detailed records of trademark use, including advertising materials, product packaging, and commercial transactions, supports enforcement efforts and proves continuous use. Engaging with patent infringement litigation counsel experienced in trademark matters ensures businesses respond appropriately to infringement threats.


Registration and Documentation


Federal trademark registration requires filing an application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office demonstrating that the logo is used in commerce and functions as a source identifier. The registration process involves examination by trademark examiners, publication for opposition, and issuance of a registration certificate providing nationwide priority. Maintaining comprehensive documentation of trademark use, including first use dates, geographic scope, and associated goods or services, strengthens trademark rights and supports enforcement actions. Regular renewal of trademark registrations every ten years ensures continuous protection. Registering variations of logos and protecting related marks prevents competitors from adopting confusingly similar alternatives.



Monitoring and Rapid Response


Active monitoring of e-commerce platforms, social media, domain registrations, and competitor activity helps identify logo infringement early before significant brand damage occurs. Setting up Google Alerts, monitoring trademark databases, and conducting periodic internet searches for unauthorized logo use enables rapid detection of infringement. Sending prompt cease and desist letters upon discovering infringement often resolves disputes without litigation. Documenting all instances of unauthorized use, including screenshots, URLs, and dates, creates evidence supporting enforcement actions. Businesses that respond quickly to logo infringement typically minimize consumer confusion and brand dilution.

Infringement TypeCommon IndicatorsRecommended Action
Counterfeit ProductsUnauthorized goods bearing fake logos, poor quality, suspiciously low pricesReport to customs, law enforcement, and platform; pursue litigation
Online Marketplace AbuseUnauthorized sellers using logos, fake product listings, impersonation accountsReport to platform, send cease and desist, file DMCA takedown notices
Domain CybersquattingDomain names incorporating trademarks, redirects to competitor sitesUDRP proceedings, cease and desist letters, litigation if necessary
Social Media ImpersonationFake accounts using brand logos, misleading followers, unauthorized contentReport to social media platform, request account removal, legal action

02 Feb, 2026


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone