1. Logo Infringement in New York : Understanding Trademark Rights
Federal and State Protection Standards
Federal trademark protection is governed by the Lanham Act, codified at 15 U.S.C. § 1127, which establishes the framework for trademark registration and enforcement. The Lanham Act provides remedies including injunctive relief, monetary damages, and destruction of infringing goods. New York State also recognizes common law trademark rights and provides additional protections through state statutes. The New York General Business Law § 368 addresses trademark infringement and unfair competition, offering state-level remedies for businesses whose marks are misused. To establish logo infringement under federal law, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant's use creates a likelihood of confusion regarding the source or sponsorship of goods or services
The Likelihood of Confusion Test
Courts apply a multi-factor test to determine whether logo infringement has occurred. The test examines the strength of the original mark, similarity between the marks, proximity of goods or services, evidence of actual confusion, sophistication of consumers, and the defendant's intent in adopting the similar mark. A registered logo enjoys a presumption of validity and nationwide priority from the registration date. The more distinctive and well-known a logo is, the stronger the protection against similar marks. Even partial similarity can constitute infringement if consumers are likely to be confused about the source of goods or services.
2. Logo Infringement in New York : Common Infringement Scenarios
Digital and Online Infringement
The digital marketplace has created new avenues for logo infringement through e-commerce platforms, social media, and counterfeit online retailers. Unauthorized sellers often use company logos on third-party marketplaces to deceive consumers into purchasing counterfeit or inferior products. Search engine advertising abuse, where competitors bid on branded keywords to display their logos alongside legitimate results, can constitute infringement under certain circumstances. Online platforms like Amazon, eBay, and social media networks provide reporting mechanisms to address logo infringement, but enforcement often requires legal action to obtain complete relief. Businesses must actively monitor their online presence and take swift action when unauthorized logo use is discovered.
Counterfeiting and Physical Goods
Counterfeiting involves manufacturing and distributing goods bearing fake logos that infringe registered trademarks. This activity not only violates trademark law but may also constitute criminal conduct under 18 U.S.C. § 2320. Counterfeit goods damage brand reputation, harm consumer safety, and generate illegal profits for infringers. Customs agencies can seize counterfeit imports at borders, but businesses must provide evidence of registration and trademark ownership. Working with law enforcement and customs officials can help stop the distribution of counterfeit products bearing infringing logos.
3. Logo Infringement in New York : Enforcement and Remedies
Injunctive Relief and Court Orders
Preliminary injunctions can halt ongoing infringement while litigation proceeds, preventing further brand damage and consumer confusion. Courts typically grant preliminary injunctions when the trademark owner demonstrates a likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm absent an injunction, and that the balance of equities favors stopping the infringing use. Permanent injunctions issued after trial judgment provide long-term protection by legally prohibiting the defendant from continuing to use the infringing logo. Injunctive relief is often the most valuable remedy because it prevents ongoing harm to brand reputation and market share. Courts may also order the destruction or recall of products bearing infringing logos.
Monetary Damages and Remedies
Trademark owners can recover the infringer's profits attributable to the infringing use, actual damages to the brand owner's business, and reasonable attorney fees in exceptional cases. The Lanham Act permits courts to award enhanced damages up to three times the actual damages in cases of willful infringement. Statutory damages are available in counterfeiting cases, with penalties ranging from ten thousand to one hundred thousand dollars per counterfeit mark per type of goods. These monetary remedies incentivize compliance and compensate businesses for losses resulting from logo infringement. Documenting actual damages through sales records, market research, and brand valuation strengthens damage claims in litigation.
4. Logo Infringement in New York : Proactive Protection Strategies
Registration and Documentation
Federal trademark registration requires filing an application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office demonstrating that the logo is used in commerce and functions as a source identifier. The registration process involves examination by trademark examiners, publication for opposition, and issuance of a registration certificate providing nationwide priority. Maintaining comprehensive documentation of trademark use, including first use dates, geographic scope, and associated goods or services, strengthens trademark rights and supports enforcement actions. Regular renewal of trademark registrations every ten years ensures continuous protection. Registering variations of logos and protecting related marks prevents competitors from adopting confusingly similar alternatives.
Monitoring and Rapid Response
Active monitoring of e-commerce platforms, social media, domain registrations, and competitor activity helps identify logo infringement early before significant brand damage occurs. Setting up Google Alerts, monitoring trademark databases, and conducting periodic internet searches for unauthorized logo use enables rapid detection of infringement. Sending prompt cease and desist letters upon discovering infringement often resolves disputes without litigation. Documenting all instances of unauthorized use, including screenshots, URLs, and dates, creates evidence supporting enforcement actions. Businesses that respond quickly to logo infringement typically minimize consumer confusion and brand dilution.
| Infringement Type | Common Indicators | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Counterfeit Products | Unauthorized goods bearing fake logos, poor quality, suspiciously low prices | Report to customs, law enforcement, and platform; pursue litigation |
| Online Marketplace Abuse | Unauthorized sellers using logos, fake product listings, impersonation accounts | Report to platform, send cease and desist, file DMCA takedown notices |
| Domain Cybersquatting | Domain names incorporating trademarks, redirects to competitor sites | UDRP proceedings, cease and desist letters, litigation if necessary |
| Social Media Impersonation | Fake accounts using brand logos, misleading followers, unauthorized content | Report to social media platform, request account removal, legal action |
02 Feb, 2026

