Skip to main content

call now

  • About
  • lawyers
  • practices
  • Insights
  • Locations
contact uscontact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

AccessibilityCookie StatementDisclaimersLegal NoticePrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions

U.S.

New York
Washington, D.C.

Asia

Seoul
Busan

© 2025 SJKP, LLP
All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

quick menu
CONTACT US
call center
CLICK TO START YOUR FREE CONSULTATION
CONTACT US
call center

  1. Home
  2. Public Ethics Law

Insights

A curated collection of observations, industry developments, and firm perspectives on legal trends and business issues. These materials are provided for general informational and educational purposes only and are not legal advice. For guidance tailored to your specific situation, please contact our attorneys.

Public Ethics Law

In New York, the Anti-Corruption Solicitation Law governs ethical conduct among public officials, prohibiting specific undue solicitations and the receipt of improper gifts. This article details the scope, prohibited actions, penalties, and essential reporting procedures under this critical law. The primary objective is to maintain public trust and ensure that governmental actions are guided solely by public interest.

contents


1. New York Public Ethics Law: Scope and Covered Parties


This comprehensive law is designed to safeguard the integrity and independence of public service across the state. It mandates that public officials and associated individuals uphold the highest standards of conduct, specifically prohibiting improper solicitations and strictly limiting the acceptance of gifts, regardless of the giver's intent. The statute serves as a foundational pillar for ethical governance, establishing clear boundaries between public duty and private interest.



Covered Entities


The Anti-Corruption Solicitation Law applies to a broad and essential range of individuals and institutions involved in public life, ensuring widespread compliance across various sectors:

  • All state and municipal government agencies and officials.
  • Employees of public authorities, commissions, and boards.
  • Officers and faculty at public and charter schools.
  • Spouses of public officials if benefiting from solicitation.
  • Private contractors performing public functions (e.g., court-appointed attorneys, public health doctors).
  •  

These categories are consistent with the stringent definitions found in New York’s Public Officers Law §73 and are enforced through guidelines set by the relevant ethics commissions.



2. New York Public Ethics Law: Prohibited Conduct and Exemptions


The law strictly prohibits both the act of solicitation by any individual and the acceptance of a solicitation by a public official if the action's sole or primary purpose is to improperly influence the official's public duties. This dual prohibition ensures accountability on both sides of a potential ethical violation, strengthening the overall deterrent effect of the statute.



Prohibited Solicitations


A solicitation constitutes a violation of the New York Public Ethics Law when it attempts to influence a public official in the performance of their official functions. This includes a wide array of high-risk activities:

  • Influencing licensing or permit decisions or manipulating administrative or criminal penalties.
  • Interfering with the fair hiring, promotion, or dismissal of public employees.
  • Seeking to secure a government contract, grant, or subsidy through improper influence.
  • Leaking confidential bid or procurement information to gain an unfair advantage.
  • Affecting school admissions, academic evaluations, or judicial and prosecutorial decisions.

Crucially, the law also prohibits any solicitation conducted indirectly through a third party with the same corrupt objective.



Permissible Requests


Certain transparent and proper actions are specifically excluded from violations to ensure the functionality of government and the public's right to engage with it:

Type of ActionRequirement for Permissibility
Formal Petitions or ApplicationsMust be submitted strictly in accordance with established government statutes and regulations.
Public Expressions of ConcernIncludes collective complaints or widespread concerns expressed openly.
Requests for InformationSimple inquiries for clarification on application status or procedural requirements.
Official LobbyingMust be conducted with appropriate registration and full public disclosures.


3. New York Public Ethics Law: Gift and Benefit Limitations


New York maintains stringent limits on gifts offered to public officials, specifically targeting those with regulatory authority or roles tied to procurement. These restrictions are in place to prevent even the appearance of impropriety and to shield officials from subtle attempts to buy influence. The rules are structured to be clear and categorical, minimizing ambiguities in enforcement.



Banned Gift Transactions


Public officials are strictly prohibited from accepting gifts, even in the absence of a direct exchange of favors, under the following clear-cut conditions:

  • Financial Thresholds: Acceptance of a single item valued over $75 or cumulative gifts over $100 annually from a single source is illegal.
  • Cash Equivalents: Any form of cash or easily convertible cash equivalents (such as checks, vouchers, or gift cards) is absolutely prohibited, regardless of the value.
  • Disguised Hospitality: Personal hospitality or travel that is clearly disguised as official business, or which exceeds reasonable and customary norms, is also banned.


Exceptions to Gift Prohibitions


The law allows certain items under defined circumstances, provided they are transparent and lack substantial value, such as:

Type of ItemPermissible If...
Meals or BeveragesValued under $15 per occasion, are infrequent, and not directly tied to any decision-making process.
Commemorative ItemsItems of a nominal or trivial value (e.g., plaques, certificates) that serve a purely ceremonial purpose.
Gifts from Close Family MembersMotivated solely by a familial relationship and demonstrably not influenced by the official's public duties.


4. New York Public Ethics Law: Penalties, Enforcement, and Reporting


Violations of the New York Anti-Corruption Solicitation Law can lead to significant consequences, encompassing both administrative sanctions and severe criminal penalties. The enforcement mechanisms are robust, ensuring that breaches of public trust are met with appropriate disciplinary action.



Sanctions and Accountability


Penalties vary depending on the role of the individual and the nature of the violation:

  • Individuals Soliciting on Behalf of Third Parties: Civil fines up to $10,000.
  • Officials Receiving Solicitations: Civil fines up to $30,000.
  • Officials Who Act Upon the Solicitation: Potential criminal charges, up to 2 years’ imprisonment, or a criminal fine of $20,000.
  • Gift Violations over $1,000: Potential felony charges under the Penal Law if linked to bribery.
  • Gift Violations under $1,000: Civil penalty between 2x to 5x the monetary value of the gift.

Additionally, government employees may face internal disciplinary actions, including suspension, demotion, or dismissal from public service.



Duty to Report


A cornerstone of the Anti-Corruption Solicitation Law is the mandatory duty to report any improper solicitation. The systematic process ensures every incident is logged and evaluated:

  • Step 1: The public employee must explicitly refuse the request and immediately log the incident.
  • Step 2: The employee must report the details to their agency's ethics officer or Inspector General.
  • Step 3: The agency must evaluate the case and, if necessary, refer it to law enforcement or the New York State Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government (COELIG).

This strict process guarantees complete documentation and facilitates swift, transparent investigation by the proper authorities.


31 Jul, 2025

Older Posts

view list

Newer Posts

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

contents

  • Administrative Appeal Denial

  • Administrative Hearing Denial

  • Stay of Enforcement: Requirements, Effect, and Procedure

  • Stay of Enforcement Application