Skip to main content

call now

  • About
  • lawyers
  • practices
  • Insights
  • Locations
contact uscontact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

AccessibilityCookie StatementDisclaimersLegal NoticePrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions

U.S.

New York
Washington, D.C.

Asia

Seoul
Busan

© 2025 SJKP, LLP
All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

quick menu
CONTACT US
call center
CLICK TO START YOUR FREE CONSULTATION
CONTACT US
call center

  1. Home
  2. Tax Dispute Legal Procedure

Insights

A curated collection of observations, industry developments, and firm perspectives on legal trends and business issues. These materials are provided for general informational and educational purposes only and are not legal advice. For guidance tailored to your specific situation, please contact our attorneys.

Tax Dispute Legal Procedure

When taxpayers in New York feel that tax assessments, penalties, or collection actions have unlawfully violated their rights, they have the legal authority to pursue corrective judicial measures. This process is referred to as the tax dispute legal procedure, a formal pathway that includes administrative appeals and judicial litigation under New York State law. Understanding the nuances of this process is crucial for any individual or business challenging a determination by the Department of Taxation and Finance.

contents


1. Tax Dispute Legal Procedure New York: Understanding the Process


Tax disputes in New York typically begin when a taxpayer receives a tax bill or penalty they believe is unjust or incorrect. The state provides several formal legal steps for disputing such determinations before resorting to court litigation. Navigating this initial administrative phase correctly is essential, as failure to follow the proper procedure and deadlines can severely limit a taxpayer's ability to seek relief later.



Formal Tax Objection


The initial step in a tax dispute is usually a formal objection, which must be filed promptly after the tax notice is received. This objection is submitted to the New York Department of Taxation and Finance and requests cancellation or correction of the notice based on identified legal or factual errors. This stage is often referred to as a Conciliation Conference Request or Bureau of Conciliation and Mediation Services (BCMS) review, aiming for an informal resolution before a formal hearing becomes necessary.

  • Deadline: 90 days from the notice date
  • Filing Method: Online or by mail using Form CMS-1
  • Outcome: Informal resolution or escalation to appeal to protect the taxpayer's rights.


Petition for Formal Appeal


If the objection is denied or no satisfactory resolution is reached through the BCMS review, the taxpayer's next step is to file a petition for appeal to the Division of Tax Appeals (DTA). This DTA serves as an independent tribunal where Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) conduct formal hearings and evaluate the evidence presented by both the taxpayer and the Department of Taxation and Finance. The process is governed by New York Tax Law § 170–§ 179 and represents the final administrative remedy available before judicial intervention.

  • Deadline: 90 days after receiving denial from BCMS
  • Outcome: Binding determination unless appealed to a judicial court
  • Venue: Division of Tax Appeals (DTA)


2. Tax Dispute Legal Procedure New York: When Lawsuits Become Necessary


After exhausting all available administrative remedies through the Division of Tax Appeals, taxpayers may then initiate judicial litigation to further challenge the state's determination. This step is a significant escalation and is typically pursued when a taxpayer seeks an independent legal review of the administrative outcome. Initiating a lawsuit is not a substitute for the administrative process; rather, it's a review of the final agency action, filed only after the internal appeals have concluded.



Initiating an Article 78 Proceeding


Taxpayers may initiate judicial litigation in the form of an Article 78 Proceeding in the New York Supreme Court to challenge the administrative decision. This specific type of litigation is generally filed when a taxpayer asserts that the administrative decision-making process was flawed, not when they simply disagree with the outcome. Grounds for an Article 78 challenge include claims that the administrative agency acted illegally, abused its discretion, or made a determination that was not supported by substantial evidence.

 

Circumstances for Filing:

  • The taxpayer challenges the legality of the state’s final decision.
  • Procedural due process was allegedly violated during the administrative review.
  • The DTA or tax authorities acted beyond their lawful powers.

 

Deadline: Within 4 months of the final agency action



3. Tax Dispute Legal Procedure New York: Court Litigation and Claims


Tax-related lawsuits in New York may take different forms depending on the legal nature of the dispute and the relief sought. These can range from a review of the administrative action to original actions seeking refunds or challenging the constitutionality of a tax law. Effective legal representation is crucial here, as these actions are governed by the rigorous standards of the New York Civil Practice Law & Rules (CPLR).



Pursuing Civil Claims Against the State


Beyond the Article 78 administrative review, taxpayers may file original civil claims against the state to recover overpaid taxes or prevent improper collection actions. These civil actions allow the taxpayer to address monetary claims and collection issues directly in a judicial forum, particularly when an administrative remedy is unavailable or inadequate. Such claims often require a preliminary notice of claim filing to the proper state entity.

Types of Civil Claims:

  • Refund Litigation: Seeking repayment of overpaid taxes that were not resolved administratively.
  • Injunction Action: Legally halting improper or unlawful tax collection activities by the state.
  • State Damages Claim: Seeking monetary compensation under the Court of Claims Act in specific circumstances.


4. Tax Dispute Legal Procedure New York: Key Considerations and Strategic Preparation


Understanding the strict deadlines and procedural requirements in New York's tax dispute process is not just important—it is absolutely crucial for preserving your rights and maintaining the viability of your case. Missing any of the prescribed timeframes may result in the automatic dismissal of the dispute, regardless of the merit of the underlying claim. Strategic preparation, therefore, involves rigorous adherence to deadlines and the meticulous gathering of evidence.



Critical Deadlines and Requirements


Effective legal preparation during tax disputes is essential due to the complex procedural rules and the mandatory requirement to exhaust all administrative remedies before moving to court. The burden of proof often falls squarely on the taxpayer to demonstrate that the tax authority's determination is incorrect, making thorough preparation non-negotiable. Moreover, proper preparation increases the likelihood of a successful resolution.

Legal StepFiling Deadline
Objection / BCMS ReviewWithin 90 days of assessment notice
Petition to Division of Appeals (DTA)Within 90 days of BCMS denial
Article 78 LawsuitWithin 4 months of final agency action
Refund LawsuitTypically 2 years after refund denial


Documentation and Settlement Possibilities


Taxpayers should prepare a comprehensive body of evidence to support their claim, as the success of any tax dispute hinges on documented facts and legal arguments. Proper documentation includes detailed accounting records and all correspondence with the tax authority. Furthermore, the New York Department of Taxation and Finance often offers settlement agreements to resolve disputes prior to a final judgment. These agreements may include Closing Agreements for final determination of tax liability or an Offer in Compromise to settle the debt for a reduced amount in hardship cases.

  • Essential Documentation: Detailed accounting records, communications with the tax authority, expert reports if valuation is disputed, and legal arguments referencing Tax Law and precedent.
  • Settlement Options: Closing Agreements under §171-F, Compromise of Penalties, and Installment Agreements for outstanding collections.

05 Aug, 2025

Older Posts

view list

Newer Posts

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

contents

  • Tax Advisory Services

  • Tax Consultation

  • Tax Assessment Challenge System

  • Tax Dispute Resolution Procedure