Skip to main content
  • About
  • lawyers
  • practices
  • Legal Information
  • Locations
youtubeYoutubeinstagramInstagramcontact uscontact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

AccessibilityCookie StatementDisclaimersLegal NoticePrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions

U.S.

New York

Asia

Korea

© 2025 SJKP, LLP
All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

quick menu
online Consult
call center
online Consult
call center

  1. Home
  2. New York Competition Law Violations

legal information

We provide a variety of legal knowledge and information, and inform you about legal procedures and response methods in each field.

New York Competition Law Violations

Violations of competition law in the United States, often referred to as antitrust law, are practices that harm consumers and businesses by disrupting the free market. While the federal government has jurisdiction over nationwide antitrust issues, states like New York have their own specific statutes and enforcement mechanisms to combat anticompetitive conduct. This article provides a comprehensive overview of New York’s primary competition law, the Donnelly Act, and its enforcement, which is crucial for any entity operating within the state's economy.

contents


1. New York Competition Law: The Scope of the Donnelly Act


The Donnelly Act is New York’s central competition law, codified in Section 340 of the New York General Business Law. It is modeled after the federal Sherman Antitrust Act and prohibits "every agreement, arrangement, or combination" that creates a monopoly or restrains trade within the state. Unlike its federal counterpart, the Donnelly Act has historically been more limited in scope, focusing primarily on multi-party conduct rather than the actions of a single firm. Recent legislative proposals have aimed to broaden its reach to address modern market dynamics, reflecting a growing recognition of the need for stronger protections against monopolistic behavior. This evolution underscores the state's commitment to maintaining a fair and competitive marketplace for both businesses and consumers.



Violations and Prohibited Practices


The Donnelly Act makes a range of agreements and practices illegal, with a focus on agreements between competitors that harm the market. These actions are considered "per se" illegal, meaning they are so inherently anticompetitive that they are unlawful without any need for further analysis of their market effect. Other practices fall under a "rule of reason" analysis, where a court must weigh the pro-competitive benefits against the anti-competitive harms.
 

  • Price-Fixing: Any formal or informal agreement among competitors to set, raise, or maintain prices for goods or services.
  • Bid-Rigging: A collusive scheme where competitors coordinate their bids on a contract to ensure a pre-determined winner.
  • Market Allocation: Agreements to divide territories, customers, or markets among competitors to reduce or eliminate competition.
  • Group Boycotts: Agreements among competitors to refuse to do business with a certain individual or company.
  • Tying Arrangements: Conditioning the sale of one product or service on the buyer's agreement to also purchase a different, often undesired, product or service.


2. New York Competition Law: Enforcement and Legal Procedures


The New York State Attorney General's Antitrust Bureau is the primary entity responsible for enforcing the Donnelly Act. The Bureau investigates and prosecutes companies and individuals who violate the law. Investigations are typically initiated through a subpoena or a Civil Investigative Demand (CID), which is a powerful tool to compel the production of documents, data, and testimony from a company. If the investigation reveals sufficient evidence of a violation, the Attorney General can initiate a civil lawsuit in state court to seek remedies and impose penalties. The proactive enforcement by this bureau highlights New York’s commitment to policing its markets and deterring anticompetitive conduct before it can cause widespread harm.



Investigation to Final Ruling


The investigation and enforcement process under the Donnelly Act is a multi-stage process that can be both complex and lengthy. It is a quasi-judicial process in many ways, with a clear path for a subject of an investigation to respond to allegations.

  • Initial Review and Investigation: An investigation begins when the Attorney General's Office receives a tip or initiates a review on its own. The office may issue a CID to gather evidence, which can include electronic data, company records, and witness interviews.
  • Litigation and Settlement: If a violation is found, the Attorney General can file a civil complaint. The parties may choose to enter into a settlement, often in the form of an Assurance of Discontinuance (AOD), to avoid the costs and risks of a trial. An AOD does not admit guilt but requires the company to cease the illegal conduct and may include monetary penalties.
  • Court Proceedings: If a case proceeds to litigation, it is heard in a New York State court. The Attorney General will seek remedies such as injunctions to stop the illegal conduct, civil penalties, and restitution for victims.


3. New York Competition Law: Penalties and Private Actions


Violating the Donnelly Act can result in severe civil and criminal penalties, which are outlined in the law itself. The Attorney General has the authority to seek these penalties, and private parties who are harmed by anticompetitive conduct also have a powerful legal tool for redress. These dual enforcement mechanisms—public and private—create a powerful deterrent against illegal behavior and ensure that victims have a clear path to recovery. The structure of these penalties is designed to reflect the seriousness of the violation and to discourage future misconduct.



Penalties


The specific penalties vary depending on whether the violator is a corporation or an individual, and whether the case is a civil or criminal matter.

 

ViolationCivil PenaltiesCriminal Penalties
Corporate ViolationUp to $1,000,000 fine per violation in an action brought by the Attorney General.Felony conviction, with a fine of up to $1,000,000.
Individual ViolationUp to $100,000 fine per violation in an action brought by the Attorney General.Felony conviction, with a fine of up to $100,000 and up to 4 years imprisonment.

 

Additionally, private parties who can prove they were harmed by a Donnelly Act violation can file a lawsuit and may be entitled to significant compensation. This is known as a private right of action. A successful plaintiff can recover treble damages (three times the actual damages sustained), as well as their costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. This provision serves as a strong incentive for individuals and businesses to enforce the law on their own.



4. New York Competition Law: Navigating


New York's competition law framework is both robust and actively enforced. For businesses operating within the state, understanding and complying with the Donnelly Act is critical to avoiding substantial financial penalties and legal exposure. For consumers and smaller businesses, the law provides a clear pathway to seek redress when they have been harmed by anticompetitive practices. Navigating these complex legal landscapes often requires guidance to ensure proper compliance and to effectively pursue a claim, highlighting the importance of legal counsel in interpreting the nuances of the law and its application in real-world scenarios.


01 Sep, 2025

Older Posts

view list

Newer Posts

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

contents

  • New York Competition Law Investigation Procedures: An Overview

  • Washington D.C. Antitrust Investigation Procedures

  • New York Antitrust Investigation Obstruction

  • Washington D.C. Obstruction of Antitrust Investigations