Skip to main content
  • About
  • attorneys
  • practices
  • Legal Information
  • Locations
youtubeYoutubeinstagramInstagramcontact uscontact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

AccessibilityCookie StatementDisclaimersLegal NoticePrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions

U.S.

New York

Asia

Korea

© 2025 SJKP, LLP
All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

quick menu
online Consult
call center
online Consult
call center

  1. Home
  2. New York eDiscovery Laws and Litigation Readiness

legal information

We provide a variety of legal knowledge and information, and inform you about legal procedures and response methods in each field.

New York eDiscovery Laws and Litigation Readiness

New York eDiscovery law governs the processes of preserving, collecting, and producing electronically stored information (ESI) during civil, commercial, and regulatory proceedings. Litigants and counsel practicing in New York courts must be particularly attentive to both the CPLR and the New York Commercial Division Rules, which impose unique requirements.

contents


1. New York eDiscovery Framework in State and Federal Courts


New York operates under a dual system—state courts governed by the Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) and federal courts governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP). While the two systems share common elements, New York's Commercial Division has adopted progressive guidelines that affect eDiscovery procedures.



New York eDiscovery Scope and CPLR 3101


CPLR § 3101 governs disclosure in civil actions and includes provisions on ESI. The statute allows broad discovery but requires relevance, materiality, and proportionality. Parties may limit overly burdensome data production through protective orders.



New York eDiscovery Commercial Division Rule 11-c


Rule 11-c requires parties to produce ESI in reasonably usable formats and encourages early cooperation on preservation and metadata issues. The rule also promotes categorical document production, especially in complex commercial cases.



2. New York eDiscovery Preservation and Notice Obligations


The obligation to preserve ESI arises when litigation is reasonably foreseeable. In New York, courts may issue adverse inference instructions if a party fails to take adequate steps to preserve data after this point.

 



New York eDiscovery Litigation Hold Requirements


Legal hold notices must be issued promptly once litigation is anticipated. These notices must instruct custodians not to destroy or alter relevant ESI and should be properly monitored throughout the case lifecycle.



New York eDiscovery Custodian Identification


Identifying key custodians early is critical. Counsel must assess data sources, including personal devices and cloud accounts, and initiate collection strategies in a manner that preserves chain of custody.



3. New York eDiscovery Sanctions, Ethics, and Production Standards


Failing to comply with eDiscovery duties in New York may result in sanctions under CPLR § 3126. In addition, lawyers are subject to ethical obligations under the New York Rules of Professional Conduct.



New York eDiscovery Sanctions Under CPLR 3126


If a party destroys relevant ESI or delays production, courts may impose remedies such as evidence preclusion, adverse inference, or dismissal of claims. Willful misconduct leads to harsher consequences.



New York eDiscovery Format and Metadata Expectations


Parties are expected to exchange data in native format or searchable PDFs with full metadata, unless otherwise agreed. Manipulating metadata or failing to document processing steps may be deemed improper conduct.



4. New York eDiscovery Checklist for Pretrial Preparation


To assist parties in staying compliant, the following simplified checklist highlights key considerations during the eDiscovery lifecycle:

 

New York eDiscovery Key Phases:

- Anticipate litigation and issue legal holds

- Identify custodians and data sources

- Negotiate ESI protocols and production formats

- Conduct proportional review and redaction

- Monitor chain of custody and audit trails


18 Jul, 2025

Older Posts

view list

Newer Posts

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

contents
  • New York Digital Evidence Analysis

  • Washington D.C. Digital Forensics

  • New York Mobile Device Forensics

  • Washington D.C. Cell Phone Forensics Evidence Collection and Analysis Methods