Skip to main content
  • About
  • attorneys
  • practices
  • Legal Information
  • Locations
youtubeYoutubeinstagramInstagramcontact uscontact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

AccessibilityCookie StatementDisclaimersLegal NoticePrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions

U.S.

New York

Asia

Korea

© 2025 SJKP, LLP
All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

quick menu
online Consult
call center
online Consult
call center

  1. Home
  2. TEST | Case of Assistance in Intimidation Lawsuit | Client Charged with Special Intimidation, Not Indicted

legal information

We provide a variety of legal knowledge and information, and inform you about legal procedures and response methods in each field.

TEST | Case of Assistance in Intimidation Lawsuit | Client Charged with Special Intimidation, Not Indicted

The client who came to us with a threat complaint was being sued by the other party for special intimidation and came to us as a criminal lawyer for a detailed consultation in order to successfully defend against punishment.

contents


1. client who came to us with a threat complaint


Assistance case for Daeryun blackmail lawsuit criminal case

 

This is a case where a client who came to us with a blackmail complaint was in danger of being sued for special blackmail and punished, but was able to proceed with the case with a criminal lawyer and obtain a decision from the prosecution not to indict.



Client accused of retaliatory crime


The detailed story of the client who came to us with a blackmail complaint is as follows.

 

The client was driving home from work as usual when he heard a loud thud as he got close to the car next to him.

 

When the client heard the impact sound but the vehicle did not stop, he concluded that the other party was driving under the influence and instructed them to stop the vehicle.

 

During the process, the client overtook the other party's vehicle and braked suddenly about 7 times. Feeling threatened by this, the other party sued the client for special intimidation.

 

The client expressed confusion and resentment, saying that he simply wanted to check if there had been an accident and had no intention of retaliation.

 

🔗 You have come to us as a criminal lawyer to get the prosecution to decide not to indict you with the help of a specialized lawyer who has handled many retaliatory driving/reckless driving cases.



2. Retaliatory crimes identified through intimidation accusations


The client, who was indicted on charges of special intimidation, wanted to establish a systematic defense strategy with a professional lawyer.

 

Let's take a closer look at the punishment for special intimidation.



Punishment for retaliatory crimes


Retaliatory driving is not a simple mistake made in the heat of the moment, but an intentional act of threatening others by using a dangerous vehicle such as a car.

 

These acts go beyond simple traffic violations and are classified as crimes punishable more severely under criminal law, such as assault or intimidation.

 

If you commit retaliatory driving, different levels of punishment will be applied depending on the act.

 

 

Punishment for retaliatory crimes

 

Special injury

Imprisonment for not less than 1 year but not more than 10 years

Special damage crime

Imprisonment for up to 5 years or a fine of up to 10 million won

Special assault crime

Imprisonment for up to 5 years or a fine of up to 10 million won

Special intimidation crime

Imprisonment for up to 7 years or a fine of up to 10 million won



3. Response strategy to intimidation lawsuit cases


Case of non-indictment for special assault and intimidation against Daeryun

 

The criminal lawyer accurately identified the circumstances of the case and then set a logical course of action.

 

In an attempt to minimize liability for the special intimidation charges, the following arguments were made:

 

Issues of the case


1. Whether there is an intent to threaten or not 
2. Whether there is an act of causing fear or not


05 Jun, 2025
view list

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

Related case

TEST | SJKP LLP Advises on Financing for Walgreens Boots Alliance’s US$23.7 Billion Acquisition by Sycamore Partners
contents
  • New York Filing a Formal Accusation: Understanding the Legal Process

  • Washington D.C. Criminal Complaint Procedures

  • New York Criminal Law Specialist Consultation Checklist Before Scheduling

  • Washington D.C. Criminal Defense Attorney Consultation