practices
Experts in various fields find solutions for customers. We provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.
New York Criminal Evidence
Legal Standards and Courtroom Practice
In New York, criminal evidence is governed by both statutory rules and case law interpretations. It determines what information can be introduced in criminal trials and ensures fairness in the justice system.
contents
1. New York Criminal Evidence: Admissibility Under CPLR and CPL
New York criminal courts follow the Criminal Procedure Law (CPL) and Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) when considering admissibility. Evidence must be relevant, material, and competent.
New York Criminal Evidence: Relevance and Probative Value
Evidence must logically relate to an issue in the case and have the power to prove or disprove a fact. However, courts may exclude evidence if it causes undue prejudice or confusion.
2. New York Criminal Evidence: Hearsay Rules and Recognized Exceptions
Hearsay, generally inadmissible in New York criminal trials, is defined as an out-of-court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Exceptions include spontaneous utterances, present sense impressions, and business records.
New York Criminal Evidence: Crawford and Confrontation Clause
Following Crawford v. Washington, testimonial hearsay cannot be used unless the declarant is unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the witness.
3. New York Criminal Evidence: Search, Seizure, and the Exclusionary Rule
Evidence obtained through unlawful search or seizure may be suppressed under the Fourth Amendment and New York Constitution Article I, Section 12. Warrants must be based on probable cause and be judicially approved.
New York Criminal Evidence: Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement
New York recognizes certain exceptions to the warrant rule, including consent, exigent circumstances, plain view doctrine, and searches incident to lawful arrests.
4. New York Criminal Evidence: Chain of Custody in Physical Evidence
To admit physical items such as drugs or weapons, prosecutors must establish a continuous chain of custody that accounts for every handler. Gaps or inconsistencies may result in exclusion.
New York Criminal Evidence: Tampering and Suppression Motions
Defense attorneys can file a motion to suppress if the integrity of evidence is compromised. Allegations of tampering, contamination, or missing links in the chain are common bases for such motions.
5. New York Criminal Evidence: Expert and Lay Testimony Rules
Experts may testify if their specialized knowledge helps clarify an issue. Courts follow the Frye standard, requiring general acceptance of the methodology in the scientific community.
New York Criminal Evidence: Limits on Non-Expert Opinions
Lay witnesses may offer opinions only if they are based on their own perception and are helpful in understanding the case. Personal beliefs or speculation are inadmissible.
6. New York Criminal Evidence: Brady Obligations and Disclosure Requirements
Prosecutors must disclose all evidence favorable to the accused, including information that may impeach government witnesses. Failure to comply may result in reversal of conviction or dismissal.
New York Criminal Evidence: Judicial Remedies for Violations
If Brady violations are found, courts may suppress tainted evidence, grant a new trial, or dismiss charges. Judges evaluate whether the withheld evidence would have affected the outcome.
The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
