Civil Assault and Battery: When Violent Conduct Creates Civil Liability

Assault is the intentional creation of a reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact. It is essentially the threat or the act that makes someone fear they are about to be hit. Battery is the actual harmful or offensive contact itself. One is the attempt or threat: the other is the successful completion.

Criminal assault is a matter between the state and the defendant. In contrast, a civil claim is a private dispute where the goal is to recover capital for medical bills, lost wages, and pain. You can win a civil lawsuit even if the police never made an arrest or a prosecutor dropped the charges.

A civil case is entirely separate from the criminal process. A defendant can be acquitted in a criminal trial but still be held liable for civil assault and battery. The two systems serve different masters and follow different procedural rails.

The criminal system requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The civil system uses a much lower standard: a preponderance of the evidence. This means you only need to prove it is more likely than not that the incident occurred as you described.

The defendant must have intended to cause the contact or the fear of contact. This does not mean they intended to cause a specific injury: it only means the act itself was not an accident. If someone swings a fist intending to scare you but accidentally hits you, the intent for the assault transfers to the battery.

The contact does not have to result in a broken bone to be actionable. Under civil law, offensive contact is anything that would offend a reasonable person sense of personal dignity. This includes unconsented touching or contact with things closely attached to your body, such as a hat or a bag.

Medical records provide an objective timeline of the physical harm. Even if there are no visible bruises, psychological records can document the emotional trauma. Eyewitness testimony serves to corroborate your version of the events, making it harder for the defendant to claim self defense.

In many assault cases, it is one person word against another. We look for external data points such as security footage, text messages sent after the incident, or police reports to provide the clinical clarity needed to sway a judge or jury.

These are designed to cover your actual losses. They include:

• Medical expenses and future therapy costs.
• Lost income due to time away from work.
• Pain, suffering, and emotional distress.

Because assault and battery are intentional acts, you may be eligible for punitive damages. These are not meant to compensate you but to punish the defendant for especially malicious behavior. They serve as a deterrent to ensure the conduct is not repeated.

If you voluntarily engaged in an activity where contact is expected, such as a sports match, the defendant may argue you consented to the contact. However, consent has limits. A tackle in football is consented to: a punch in the face during the huddle is not.

A defendant may claim they only used force to protect themselves. For this defense to work, the force used must have been proportional to the threat. You cannot use a deadly weapon to respond to a simple push and expect to avoid liability.

While offensive contact is technically enough for a claim, cases involving physical injury or documented medical treatment are much stronger. If there is no measurable harm, the cost of litigation may exceed the potential recovery.

Winning a judgment is not the same as receiving a check. Many individuals do not have the insurance or assets to pay a large judgment. We perform a forensic audit of the defendant assets before filing to ensure that a victory in court results in a real recovery.