Construction Scam

A foundational element of any fraud claim is a material misrepresentation of fact that induces the victim to act to their detriment. In these schemes, this often involves lying about licensing or the quality of materials.

• Proving that the contractor knowingly made false statements regarding their bonding or insurance to secure a lucrative contract.
• Demonstrating that the victim relied on these false representations to their financial detriment which resulted in a total loss of the initial investment.

We utilize the tort of deceit to seek punitive damages in civil court against the perpetrators. By proving that the act was a pre-meditated act of dishonesty, we move the case beyond a simple breach of contract, allowing for the recovery of attorney fees and damages for emotional distress. This approach is designed to make the victim whole while sending a powerful message of deterrence to the fraudster.

When a contractor scams a government entity or utilizes federal relief funds, they are subject to the False Claims Act which carries treble damages and significant civil penalties.

• Investigating whether a contractor submitted inflated invoices or false certifications of compliance to a government agency for public work.
• Representing qui tam whistleblowers who expose large-scale procurement or construction fraud within the public sector.

Under the False Claims Act, knowing is defined as actual knowledge or deliberate ignorance or reckless disregard for the truth. We defend contractors by proving that any discrepancies were the result of administrative errors or innocent mistakes rather than a calculated attempt to cheat the treasury. Our goal is to prevent a civil dispute from escalating into a debarment proceeding or a criminal indictment.

Fraudsters often utilize shell companies that have no actual assets or employees to sign contracts and collect deposits before disappearing.

• Identifying the use of phoenixing where a contractor shuts down a troubled company only to start an identical one the next day to evade debts.
• Documenting the lack of a permanent business address or valid state-issued licensing for the entities involved in the project.
•  

We utilize these red flags to build a case for systematic consumer fraud. We work with local building departments to verify the history of the contractor and demonstrate a pattern of similar abuses across multiple jurisdictions. By showing that the perpetrator targeted multiple victims with the same script, we establish the systematic nature of the crime which is essential for securing a felony conviction.

The most common form of the construction scam involves the contractor starting the project to gain the victim's trust only to disappear once a significant progress payment is made.

• Proving that the initial work was merely a smoke screen intended to facilitate the theft of a larger sum of money.
• Utilizing project management software and site logs to show the intentional and permanent cessation of labor despite the receipt of funds.
•  

We pursue these ghost contractors across state lines to ensure they cannot hide from justice. We utilize the power of the civil court to issue search orders for the business records of the perpetrator, aiming to find the hidden accounts where the stolen deposits are stored. Our strategy focuses on piercing the corporate veil to hold the individual fraudster personally liable for the corporate debt.

peed is the most critical factor in asset recovery. We act within hours of being retained to file for a prejudgment attachment of the defendant's bank accounts.

• Demonstrating to the court that there is a high probability of success on the merits and a risk that the assets will be hidden.
• Serving freezing orders on banks and third-party payment processors to halt all outgoing transfers.
•  

By securing the collateral early, we ensure that there is a pool of funds available to satisfy a final judgment. This proactive approach often forces the scammer into a settlement negotiation, as they cannot continue their lifestyle or their fraudulent operations while their accounts are frozen. We prioritize the preservation of the victim's capital above all else.

In many contractor scams, third parties such as banks, insurance adjusters, or professional advisors may have facilitated the fraud through negligence or a failure to follow internal security protocols.

• Investigating whether a bank allowed a contractor to cash a check with a forged signature or a missing endorsement.
• Pursuing claims against insurance adjusters who colluded with a storm chaser to inflate a claim in exchange for a kickback.
•  

We hold these deep-pocketed institutions accountable for their role in the loss. If a bank ignored red flags of money laundering or failed to verify the identity of a new account holder, they may be liable for the resulting damage. This strategy provides an additional layer of security for the victim, especially when the primary scammer has already spent the stolen funds.

The primary defense to a fraud charge is the lack of scienter, or criminal intent. If the contractor genuinely intended to complete the work but was prevented from doing so by financial insolvency or personal illness, they are not guilty of fraud.

• Presenting evidence of good faith efforts, such as the purchase of materials or the hiring of specialized subcontractors.
• Demonstrating that the contractor had a reasonable, honest, good-faith belief that their representations were true at the time they were made.
•  

We humanize the contractor by presenting the operational challenges they faced. We show that they invested their own capital into the project and were hit by unforeseen costs. By reframing the narrative from scam to unfortunate business failure, we dismantle the prosecution's case and protect our client's liberty and professional standing.

In many fraud cases, the alleged loss amount is vastly inflated by including the entire contract price rather than the actual economic damage.

• Utilizing expert cost-estimators to prove the value of the work that was actually performed.
• Arguing that technical violations of building codes do not constitute a false claim or a criminal act.
•  

We litigate the economics of the case to minimize the potential penalties. We show that the client received substantial value from the work that was completed, which offsets the alleged damages. This strategy is critical for reducing the sentencing guidelines in a criminal case and for negotiating a more favorable settlement in a civil suit. We ensure that our clients are not punished for the client's buyer's remorse.

Many states have passed laws that provide special protections for victims over the age of 65. These statutes allow for the recovery of three times the actual damages and the payment of all legal costs by the scammer.

• Documenting the undue influence and psychological manipulation used to coerce the senior.
• Proving that the contractor knew or should have known that the senior lacked the capacity to enter into a complex construction contract.

We use these statutes as a powerful lever to force the return of the funds. We argue that the scammer took advantage of a vulnerable adult, which is an aggravating factor that increases the severity of both civil and criminal penalties. We ensure that the legacy of the senior is preserved and that the predator does not profit from their exploitation.

A common side effect of a construction scam is that the primary scammer fails to pay their subcontractors who then file mechanic's liens against the property of the victim. The victim effectively pays twice because they must pay the scammer and then pay again to clear the title of their home from these liens.

• Moving to expunge frivolous or bad faith liens filed by subcontractors who were complicit in the original scam.
• Negotiating with legitimate subcontractors to settle their claims for cents on the dollar by using the fraud investigation as leverage.
•  

We protect the title of the home of the victim from these encumbrances. We ensure that the failure of the scammer to pay their bills does not result in the victim losing the equity in their property. Our team coordinates with title insurance companies and local courts to clear the property of all fraudulent liens, ensuring that the most valuable asset of the victim remains secure.