Skip to main content
  • About
  • lawyers
  • practices
  • Legal Information
  • Locations
youtubeYoutubeinstagramInstagramcontact uscontact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

AccessibilityCookie StatementDisclaimersLegal NoticePrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions

U.S.

New York

Asia

Korea

© 2025 SJKP, LLP
All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

quick menu
online Consult
call center
online Consult
call center

  1. Home

practices

Experts in various fields find solutions for customers. We provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

New York Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions: An Overview

The legal framework for corporate mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in New York is a complex and highly regulated area, governed by a sophisticated interplay of both state and federal law. While New York's Business Corporation Law (BCL) provides the foundational procedural steps for a merger, many significant transactions also necessitate a rigorous federal antitrust review under the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act. This multi-layered regulatory system is meticulously designed to ensure that all corporate restructuring is conducted with legal integrity and that fair market competition is maintained, thereby safeguarding the interests of both businesses and consumers alike.

contents


1. New York Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions: Federal and State Regulatory Frameworks


Navigating the M&A landscape in New York requires a deep understanding of the dual regulatory system that governs these transactions. The process is not only subject to federal oversight but also to specific state laws and regulations, creating a comprehensive legal environment.



The Hart-Scott-Rodino Act: Federal Review


The Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act is the cornerstone of federal merger review in the United States, established to provide a pre-transaction scrutiny mechanism. It mandates that parties to certain mergers and acquisitions file a premerger notification with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) for antitrust review. The fundamental purpose of this mandatory filing is to give federal agencies an opportunity to scrutinize large-scale transactions for potential anti-competitive effects before they are completed. This proactive approach prevents transactions that could harm competition from going forward without government oversight, ensuring a fair and competitive marketplace.



HSR Filing Thresholds and Waiting Period Requirements


An HSR filing is generally required when a transaction meets specific monetary thresholds, which are adjusted annually to account for economic changes. As of the 2024 updates, a transaction valued at over $119.5 million may require a filing, especially if one party has annual net sales or total assets of at least $239 million and the other has at least $23.9 million. Any transaction valued at $478 million or more is subject to HSR filing requirements regardless of the size of the parties involved.

Once the filing is made, a mandatory waiting period begins, typically lasting 30 days, to allow the FTC and DOJ to review the deal. This period can be a critical time for legal teams to prepare for potential inquiries. If the agencies have significant concerns, they can issue a "second request" for additional information, which effectively extends the waiting period until the parties fully comply.



Penalties for Non-Compliance with HSR Regulations


Failure to comply with the HSR Act's filing and waiting period requirements can lead to severe penalties. The maximum daily civil penalty for a violation is a substantial amount, with the 2024 penalty being approximately $51,744 per day. These significant fines underscore the paramount importance of strict compliance with HSR regulations for all parties involved in a major M&A transaction. The fines serve as a strong deterrent against non-compliance, ensuring that companies take their premerger obligations seriously



2. New York Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions: State-Level Review


Beyond the federal HSR Act, New York State has its own robust mechanisms for merger review. This state-level scrutiny provides a critical second layer of antitrust enforcement, complementing the federal review process and often focusing on industries that have a direct impact on New York consumers.



New York State Antitrust Review and the Donnelly Act


The New York State Attorney General's Office has the authority to investigate and challenge mergers that may violate state antitrust laws, particularly the Donnelly Act, which prohibits anti-competitive agreements and monopolies. This state-level scrutiny is particularly important for transactions within key industries like healthcare, telecommunications, and finance, where local market competition is vital. Additionally, mergers involving not-for-profit or religious corporations require the direct approval of the Attorney General or a state court. This specific requirement highlights a key area where state-level review is mandatory and critical for the transaction to proceed legally.



3. New York Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions: Procedural Requirements


New York’s Business Corporation Law (BCL) outlines the specific steps that must be followed for a merger to be legally recognized, ensuring that each transaction is executed with precision and transparency. These procedural requirements are essential for the validity of the merger.



The Merger Approval Process: Documents and Shareholder Rights


The central document in a New York corporate merger is the Certificate of Merger. This document must be filed with the New York Department of State, Division of Corporations, and contains crucial information about the transaction, including the names of the corporations involved, the terms of the merger, and a statement of approval from their respective boards and shareholders. The current filing fee for this certificate is $60.

Shareholder approval is a critical part of the merger process. Under New York law, a majority vote of shareholders is required to approve a merger plan. For minority shareholders who dissent from the merger, the law provides for dissenters' rights, which allow them to demand payment for the fair value of their shares. This is a vital protection for minority investors, ensuring they are not unfairly disadvantaged by the transaction and providing them with a legal remedy.



4. New York Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions: The Role of Legal Expertise


Given the dual federal and state regulatory framework, coupled with intricate procedural requirements, navigating a corporate merger in New York requires specialized legal expertise. A seasoned legal team can ensure seamless compliance with both federal antitrust law and New York state corporate statutes. They meticulously prepare all necessary filings, manage the complex waiting periods, and provide strategic guidance on crucial matters. This includes advising on shareholder rights, assessing potential litigation risks, and developing negotiation strategies to help secure a favorable outcome for all parties involved. This expert guidance is essential for successfully navigating the multifaceted legal landscape of New York M&A.


27 Aug, 2025
view list

Newer Posts

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

contents

  • AutoCAD Copyright Infringement

  • E-2 visa

  • Virtual Currency wages

  • Digital Asset Compliance