Skip to main content
  • About
  • lawyers
  • practices
  • Legal Information
  • Locations
youtubeYoutubeinstagramInstagramcontact uscontact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

AccessibilityCookie StatementDisclaimersLegal NoticePrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions

U.S.

New York

Asia

Korea

© 2025 SJKP, LLP
All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

quick menu
online Consult
call center
online Consult
call center

  1. Home

practices

Experts in various fields find solutions for customers. We provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

New York Franchise Dispute Prevention: Pre-Contract Franchisor Analysis

Before entering into a franchise agreement in New York, it is essential to conduct a thorough analysis of the franchisor and the contract. Careful pre-contract review helps prospective franchisees identify potential risks, avoid common pitfalls, and lay the groundwork for a successful and dispute-free franchise relationship.

contents


1. New York Franchise Dispute Prevention: Identifying Risky Franchisors


Before signing any franchise agreement in New York, thorough due diligence on the franchisor is essential. Many franchise disputes can be avoided by carefully reviewing both the franchisor’s background and the contract terms.



New York Franchise Dispute Prevention: Franchisors Without Disclosure Documents


In New York, the law requires franchisors to provide a Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD) at least 14 days before any agreement is signed or payment is made. The FDD details the franchisor’s business history, legal issues, franchisee obligations, and all fees. If a franchisor does not provide an FDD, this is a clear violation of both federal and New York law and a major red flag for potential disputes.

 

Key Points:

The New York Franchise Sales Act (N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law Art. 33) mandates FDD delivery.

Absence of an FDD may indicate unlawful operation or hidden risks.

Never proceed without reviewing and understanding the FDD.



New York Franchise Dispute Prevention: Franchisors with Too Many or Too Few Brands


A franchisor with an excessive number of brands may be focused on rapid expansion rather than sustainable growth and franchisee support. On the other hand, a franchisor with very few locations may lack a proven business model.

Risks:

Too many brands: diluted support, market saturation, short-term focus.

Too few locations: unproven concept, higher risk of failure.

 

Best Practice: Check the franchisor’s brand history, closure rates, and support systems.

 



New York Franchise Dispute Prevention: Short or Unclear Track Records


The length and transparency of a franchisor’s operation of company-owned stores is a strong indicator of business viability. A short or unclear track record may signal untested systems or lack of business stability.

What to Check:

Duration and performance of company-owned stores.

Management background and experience.

Transparency of operational results.



2. New York Franchise Dispute Prevention: Warning Signs of Profit-Focused Franchisors


Some franchisors may prioritize collecting fees over supporting franchisee success. Identifying these warning signs is critical to preventing disputes.



New York Franchise Dispute Prevention: Unsubstantiated Profit Guarantee


Franchisors that promise high or “guaranteed” profits without objective data violate both FTC regulations and New York law. Any earnings claims must be documented in Item 19 of the FDD.

What to Do:

Request written, data-backed projections.

Be wary of verbal promises not in the FDD.



New York Franchise Dispute Prevention: “No Franchise Fee” Claims


Claims of “no franchise fee” can hide other costs, such as required purchases, royalties, or inflated investments. The FDD should list all fees, including hidden or indirect costs.

Typical Fees:

Initial franchise fees

Royalties

Marketing contributions

Required purchases

Tip: Insist on a detailed, written breakdown of all costs.



New York Franchise Dispute Prevention: Upfront Payment Demands


A franchisor demanding payment before full disclosure or legal review is a major red flag. New York law prohibits collecting any payment before the FDD is provided and the waiting period has passed.

 

If Pressured:

Refuse to pay until all documents are reviewed.

Document all communications.

Consult a franchise attorney if you feel rushed.



3. New York Franchise Dispute Prevention: Importance of Legal Counsel


Franchise agreements are complex and often favor the franchisor. Legal counsel is essential to protect your interests and prevent disputes.



New York Franchise Dispute Prevention: Legal Review of Franchise Agreements


Legal review should focus on:

Territory rights and exclusivity

Renewal and termination conditions

Non-compete clauses

Dispute resolution methods

Transfer and resale restrictions

 

Legal Requirements:

Compliance with New York Franchise Sales Act and FTC rules

Proper registration with the New York Attorney General

Full disclosure of material risks


26 Jun, 2025

Older Posts

view list

Newer Posts

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

contents

  • AutoCAD Copyright Infringement

  • RFE (Request for Evidence)

  • O visa

  • E-2 visa