Skip to main content

call now

Search Menu
  • About
  • lawyers
  • practices
  • Insights
  • Case Results
  • Notice
  • Locations
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

AccessibilityCookie StatementDisclaimersLegal NoticePrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
BROCHURE DOWNLOAD

U.S.

New York
Washington, D.C.

Asia

Seoul
Busan
BROCHURE DOWNLOAD

© 2025 SJKP, LLP
All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

BROCHURE DOWNLOAD
Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone

  1. Home

practices

Our experts in various fields find solutions for customers. We provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

Housing Cooperatives: Board Power, Shareholder Rights, and Litigation Standards



A housing cooperative is a residential ownership structure in which occupants hold shares in a cooperative corporation, with housing rights governed by cooperative governance rules and residential housing law principles. In a New York housing cooperative, ownership is structured through shares in a cooperative corporation rather than direct ownership of real property. Occupancy rights arise from a proprietary lease, which defines both possession and the ongoing obligations of the shareholder to the collective entity. Governed primarily by the New York Business Corporation Law (BCL), the cooperative structure represents a unique hybrid of corporate governance and landlord-tenant law. SJKP LLP provides the clinical expertise required to navigate this technical landscape, ensuring that your occupancy rights are protected against arbitrary board actions or procedural failures.

Contents


1. The Legal Identity of New York Housing Cooperatives


In a forensic legal sense, the relationship between a shareholder and a cooperative is bilateral: it is both a corporate investment and a residential tenancy.


The Proprietary Lease and Share Structure


When you "purchase" a co-op, you are acquiring personal property(shares of stock)rather than a deed to real estate. In exchange, the corporation grants you a proprietary lease. This lease acts as the "constitution" of your home, detailing your responsibility for monthly maintenance fees which cover the building’s underlying mortgage, property taxes, and operational "burn rate."



Jurisdictional Distinctions: Supreme Vs. Civil Court


Disputes in NYC cooperatives often follow a dual-track jurisdictional path:

  • Civil Court (Housing Part): Generally handles summary proceedings related to non-payment of maintenance or traditional "holdover" evictions.
  • Supreme Court: Reserved for complex litigation, such as seeking a declaratory judgment to invalidate a board decision or pursuing injunctive relief to stop a lease termination.


2. Board Authority and the Business Judgment Rule


New York courts grant cooperative boards significant deference, but this authority is not absolute.


The Levandusky Standard


The landmark case Levandusky v. One Fifth Ave. Apt. Corp. Established that New York courts will apply the "Business Judgment Rule" to cooperative board actions. 

 

This means a court will not second-guess a board’s decision as long as it is:

  • Within the Scope of Authority: Permitted by the bylaws and proprietary lease.
  • In Good Faith: Furthering the legitimate interests of the cooperative.
  • Non-Discriminatory: Compliance with all residential housing law and fair housing mandates is mandatory.


Admissions and the Fare Act


While boards have the right to vet applicants, they must comply with evolving standards. Under the NYC FARE Act (Local Law 119 of 2024), which went into effect on June 11, 2025, the party who hires a broker or agent is responsible for the commission. Boards and agents are prohibited from passing these brokerage costs to prospective shareholders or tenants unless the applicant independently retained the agent.



3. Litigation and Termination: the Pullman Proceeding


The "Pullman Proceeding" is the terminal event of a cooperative tenancy, whereby a shareholder’s lease is terminated for "objectionable conduct."


The Pullman Precedent


Based on the case 40 W. 67th St. V. Pullman, a cooperative may terminate a proprietary lease if the board follows the strict "procedural rails" laid out in the governing documents. Unlike a standard eviction, the board’s findings of "objectionability" are given great weight by the court, provided the shareholder was given notice and an opportunity to be heard before a vote was taken.



Share Seizure and Eviction


Termination involves a high-stakes dual recovery:

  • Recovery of Possession: The physical removal of the occupant from the unit.
  • Seizure of Shares: The eventual sale of the shareholder’s stock to satisfy debts or damages. Because this process involves the forfeiture of significant equity, any failure in the service of process or the board's fiduciary duty can lead to a terminal dismissal of the action.


4. Step-by-Step Procedure: Navigating a Cooperative Dispute


Resolving a conflict with a New York cooperative board follows a specific forensic trajectory:Governance Audit: Review the proprietary lease, bylaws, and board minutes to establish the limits of board authority.Notice of Dispute: Issue a formal written objection or "Demand for Records" to create a legal paper trail.Legal Commencement: File a complaint in the appropriate court (Civil or Supreme) depending on the remedy sought.Service of Process: Legally deliver the summons to the board’s registered agent via formal service of process.Evidence Exchange (Discovery): Compel the production of board "Narrative Statements" or meeting minutes to prove arbitrary enforcement.Judgment & Enforcement: Secure a court order to restore occupancy rights or invalidate an unlawful board vote.


5. Why Strategic Legal Review Matters in 2026


Housing cooperative law is a technical discipline where a single procedural oversight—such as an improperly served notice—can lead to the permanent loss of occupancy rights. In the current legal market, the value of a co-op share is immense, and the "burn rate" of litigation is high. Relying on the board’s "informal" explanation for a decision is a strategic failure. SJKP LLP provides the clinical clarity needed to navigate these corporate-residential hybrids, ensuring your investment is engineered to withstand judicial scrutiny.


Case Intake Checklist: Auditing Your Co-Op Matter


To perform a surgical review of your housing cooperative dispute, please prepare the following:

  • The Proprietary Lease & Bylaws: The foundational "laws" of your specific building.
  • Board Correspondence: All emails, letters, or "Notices of Violation" received from the board or management.
  • Maintenance History: Proof of current payments and any disputed assessments.
  • Application Package: If the dispute involves a purchase rejection, a copy of the materials submitted to the board.
  • Evidence of Conduct: Documentation (photos, witness logs) to rebut allegations of "objectionable conduct."

06 Feb, 2026


Older Posts

view list

Newer Posts

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

contents

  • Quiet Title Action: Clearing Defective or Disputed Title

  • HOA Litigation: Legal Disputes, Enforcement, and Owner Rights

  • Condominium Law: Owner Rights, Board Authority, and Litigation Standards

  • HPD Violation: When Housing Code Violations Become Legal Liability