Inheritance Recovery

To initiate a recovery action, a claimant must first establish their legal standing as an interested person under the relevant state probate code. This standing is generally granted to beneficiaries named in a previous version of a will, legal heirs under intestacy laws and creditors of the estate who have been defrauded. The statutory grounds for recovery often center on the invalidation of the instruments used to facilitate the theft, such as a deathbed will or a suspicious deed transfer.

The court evaluates the validity of these documents based on strict execution requirements and the mental state of the decedent at the time of signing. If the document was not signed in accordance with state law or if the decedent lacked the capacity to understand the nature of the transfer, the entire transaction can be set aside. We meticulously review the procedural history of every contested document to identify the flaws that provide the basis for a successful recovery claim.

One of the most powerful tools in our arsenal is the constructive trust, an equitable remedy that the court imposes on a bad actor who has acquired title to property through fraud or a breach of trust. Under a constructive trust, the person holding the property is legally transformed into a trustee who has a singular duty to return the asset to the rightful owner. This prevent unjust enrichment and ensures that the perpetrator does not profit from their deceptive conduct.

• Imposition of equitable liens on real property to prevent its sale during litigation.
• Utilization of resulting trusts when a transfer was intended to be temporary or for a specific purpose.
• Pursuit of accounting actions to compel a full disclosure of all estate-related transactions.
• Seeking the removal of fiduciaries who have failed to protect estate assets from depletion.

Undue influence is a subtle and insidious form of theft that involves the destruction of a person free agency through psychological manipulation, isolation or threats. It is often the primary cause of wrongful transfers in estates involving elderly or vulnerable individuals. To prove undue influence, we must demonstrate that a confidential relationship existed, that the influencer had the opportunity to exert control and that the resulting transfer was a result of that influence rather than the decedent own desires.

The evidence for undue influence is often circumstantial, requiring a careful analysis of the decedent medical records, social interactions and changes in their testamentary patterns. We work with psychological experts to testify on the decedent vulnerability and the specific tactics used by the predator to secure the wrongful transfer. This multi-disciplinary approach is essential for overcoming the legal presumption that a signed document is valid.

A power of attorney is a common tool for elder care that is frequently weaponized by scammers to perform self-serving transactions under the guise of legal authority. These individuals may sell real estate, change beneficiary designations or write checks to themselves without the knowledge or consent of the family. Because the agent has a legal duty to act in the best interest of the principal, any transaction that results in a benefit to the agent is viewed with extreme suspicion by the court.

• Investigation of sudden changes to bank account titles or beneficiary designations.
• Review of real estate deeds transferred for less than fair market value.
• Analysis of large cash withdrawals or credit card charges that do not benefit the decedent.
• Documentation of the exclusion of family members from the decedent financial and medical decisions.

A pre-judgment attachment is a powerful litigation tool that allows the court to seize control of a defendant property at the beginning of a lawsuit to ensure that funds are available to satisfy a future judgment. This is particularly effective in cases involving liquid assets or high-value personal property that can be easily moved or sold. By securing these assets early, we increase the leverage of our clients during settlement negotiations and reduce the risk of a hollow victory in court.

The process of obtaining an attachment involves a high level of evidentiary detail, including a showing of the specific fraud or breach that justifies the seizure. We utilize the information gathered during our initial investigation to build a prima facie case that compels the court to act. This tactical maneuver often forces the defendant to the negotiating table by cutting off their access to the stolen capital they were using to fund their own legal defense.

While the claimant generally bears the burden of proof, the law provides several presumptions that can shift this burden to the defendant in specific circumstances. For example, if a transfer was made to a person in a confidential relationship with the decedent for no consideration, many jurisdictions apply a presumption of undue influence. This requires the defendant to prove that the transfer was fair, open and truly voluntary, a burden that is often impossible for a scammer to meet.

• Implementation of lis pendens notices on real estate to cloud the title and prevent sale.
• Utilization of third-party subpoenas to banks and brokerages to identify the location of funds.
• Pursuit of civil theft claims that allow for the recovery of treble 담ages and attorney fees.
• Coordination with law enforcement for the seizure of physical assets during criminal investigations.

Tracing assets that have been converted into cryptocurrency or moved through a series of shell companies requires advanced technical expertise and the cooperation of international financial intelligence units. We utilize blockchain analytics and corporate intelligence tools to follow the money through its various transformations, identifying the final resting place of the stolen wealth. This digital paper trail is essential for convincing a foreign court to honor a domestic freezing order or judgment.

Once the path of the capital is established, we utilize the federal court system to issue letters rogatory and international subpoenas. These tools allow us to obtain records from foreign banks and to compel testimony from witnesses located abroad. Our firm is experienced in navigating these diplomatic and legal hurdles, providing our clients with a truly global recovery capability that few other firms can match.

When an estate involves assets in multiple countries, the question of which law applies to the Inheritance Recovery effort can become a major point of contention. Scammers often choose jurisdictions with weak consumer protections or strict bank secrecy laws specifically to thwart recovery efforts. We utilize a conflict of laws analysis to argue for the application of the law that provides our clients with the best opportunity for restitution.

• Coordination with international private investigators to locate physical property and hidden accounts.
• Domestication of US judgments in foreign courts to initiate local seizure proceedings.
• Utilization of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act in cases involving state-owned entities.
• Negotiation with international cryptocurrency exchanges to freeze and return stolen digital assets.

Banks and financial institutions are required by law to provide records when presented with a valid court-authorized subpoena. These records provide the definitive history of the diverted funds, showing exactly when the capital was moved, where it was sent and who authorized the transaction. We compare these records with the decedent historical patterns to highlight the anomalies that signal fraudulent activity.

In many cases, the bank own internal fraud alerts may have been triggered by the suspicious transactions, providing additional evidence of the illicit nature of the transfers. We pursue these internal reports to show that even the financial institution viewed the activity as suspicious at the time it occurred. This level of detail is critical for establishing the bad faith of the defendant and for potentially holding the institution liable if they failed to act on their own warnings.

Modern estate theft almost always involves a digital component, whether it is the use of online banking to move funds or the use of email to manipulate a vulnerable individual. Our firm employs digital forensic experts to recover deleted messages, analyze metadata and track the origins of suspicious communications. This scientific evidence provides a layer of objectivity that is difficult for a defendant to challenge through oral testimony.

• Utilization of forensic imaging to preserve the integrity of mobile devices and computers.
• Analysis of geolocation data to prove the presence of the influencer at the time of suspicious transactions.
• Recovery of forged digital signatures and altered electronic documents used to facilitate fraud.
• Deposition of key witnesses, including caretakers, bank employees and medical professionals.