1. The Mechanics of Deception in Court
The architecture of a litigation fraud scheme relies on a conspiracy of silence between the plaintiff and the medical providers and the legal counsel who all share a financial interest in the outcome.
These are not isolated incidents of exaggeration. They are coordinated efforts to manufacture a claim from thin air. The perpetrators understand the rules of evidence and discovery better than most honest litigants and they use that knowledge to hide their tracks.
We dismantle these networks by mapping the relationships between the participants. We look for patterns. If a specific law firm always refers clients to the same chiropractor who always diagnoses the same injury regardless of the mechanics of the accident it suggests a script rather than a medical reality. We analyze the billing records to show that the treatment was driven by the litigation schedule rather than the needs of the patient.
Fabricated Evidence and Forgery
The most direct form of fraud is the creation of fake evidence. This can range from photoshopped images of an injury to forged signatures on a contract.
We use document examiners and digital forensic experts to challenge the authenticity of the evidence. We have successfully exposed cases where the metadata on a photograph proved it was taken years before the alleged accident. We also scrutinize the chain of custody. If a piece of physical evidence appears conveniently right before trial without a clear history of where it came from we move to exclude it. We argue that the sudden appearance of the smoking gun is a hallmark of litigation fraud and must be viewed with extreme skepticism by the court.
Perjury and Scripted Testimony
Witness testimony is the softest target for fraudsters because it is hard to disprove without contradictory evidence. Plaintiffs are coached to recite specific symptoms that are impossible to verify objectively such as headaches or soft tissue pain.
We attack this testimony through rigorous cross-examination. We lock the witness into a specific version of events and then dismantle it with surveillance footage or their own social media posts. We often find that a plaintiff claiming debilitating disability is posting videos of themselves at the gym or on vacation. We use their own words to prove they are lying under oath. We argue that a witness who lies about their physical capabilities is likely lying about the liability facts as well.
2. Civil RICO and Organized Crime Remedies
Federal and state Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations statutes provide a powerful weapon for victims of litigation fraud allowing them to turn the tables on the fraudsters and seek treble damages.
RICO was originally designed to fight the mafia but it is now the primary tool for fighting organized insurance fraud and legal syndicates. When a group of lawyers and doctors works together to file hundreds of fraudulent lawsuits they are operating a criminal enterprise.
We have deep experience in filing affirmative RICO actions. We do not just defend the individual injury case. We file a federal lawsuit against the law firm and the clinic alleging a pattern of racketeering activity. This changes the dynamic of the litigation instantly. The fraudster goes from being the plaintiff to being the defendant in a federal case that threatens their assets and their licenses.
Establishing the Enterprise
To win a RICO claim we must prove the existence of an enterprise. This requires showing that the defendants formed an ongoing organization with a common purpose.
We gather the data to prove this structure. We use link analysis to show the flow of money and clients between the entities. We demonstrate that the law firm funded the medical clinic or that the doctors paid kickbacks to the lawyers for referrals. We argue that these payments were not legitimate business transactions but the division of spoils from the litigation fraud. By proving the structure of the enterprise we trigger the severe penalties of the RICO statute.
The Pattern of Racketeering Activity
RICO requires proof of a pattern of criminal acts known as predicate acts. In litigation fraud cases these predicate acts are usually mail fraud and wire fraud. Every time the fraudsters mailed a fake medical bill or wired a settlement demand they committed a federal crime.
We document these acts. We present a timeline showing hundreds of acts of mail and wire fraud committed over years. We argue that this was not a one-time error but the standard operating procedure of the business. We use the sheer volume of the fraud to prove the specific intent to defraud. We show that the defendants built their entire business model on the commission of litigation fraud.
3. Uncovering the Fraud Through Discovery
The discovery process is the primary battlefield where we unearth the contradictions and the concealed evidence that prove the claim is fraudulent.
Fraudsters rely on the hope that the defendant will not look too closely. We look closer than anyone else. We use subpoenas and interrogatories to force the other side to reveal their secrets.
We demand the raw data. We do not accept the summary reports provided by the experts. We want the original notes and the metadata and the billing codes. We often find that the final report was heavily edited by the attorney to change the diagnosis or to remove unfavorable findings.
Aggressive Deposition Tactics
Depositions are where we break the case. We depose the plaintiff and the doctors and the handlers. We ask questions they are not prepared for.
We ask the doctor about their financial relationship with the lawyer. We ask the plaintiff about their prior claims history. We often find that the plaintiff has filed ten other lawsuits for the same injury. We use the ISO claim search database to find these prior undisclosed accidents. When we confront the plaintiff with their own history of litigation fraud they often crumble. We use their lies in the deposition to move for immediate dismissal of the case and for sanctions against their attorney.
Surveillance and Social Media Investigation
In the digital age no one is truly invisible. Plaintiffs leave a digital trail that contradicts their claims of injury. We employ private investigators to conduct surveillance.
We also scour the internet. We look for the Strava running logs of the plaintiff or their TikTok dance videos. If a plaintiff claims they cannot walk without a cane but their Facebook profile shows them hiking a mountain we preserve that evidence immediately. We use this digital footprint to impeach the witness at trial. We argue that the jury cannot trust a single word from a person who attempts to perpetrate such a brazen litigation fraud on the court.
4. Criminal Consequences and Prosecution
While many fraud cases are resolved in civil court the most egregious offenders face criminal prosecution for insurance fraud and perjury and grand theft.
We work closely with law enforcement and District Attorney offices. When we uncover evidence of a crime we package it and present it to the prosecutors.
We understand the specific statutes that criminalize this conduct. In many jurisdictions filing a false insurance claim is a specific felony. We ensure that the evidence we gather in the civil case is admissible in the criminal case.
Perjury and Obstruction of Justice
Lying in a deposition or an affidavit is perjury. Destroying evidence is obstruction of justice. These are serious felonies that carry prison time.
We pursue these charges to deter future fraud. If a plaintiff lies about their medical history we ask the judge to refer the matter to the prosecutor. We argue that the integrity of the court depends on the truthful testimony of witnesses. We take a zero-tolerance approach to perjury. We believe that if you lie to the court you should go to jail. This aggressive stance sends a message to the plaintiff bar that litigation fraud will not be tolerated.
Professional Sanctions and Disbarment
Lawyers and doctors who participate in fraud risk their licenses. We file complaints with the State Bar and the Medical Board.
We provide the regulatory agencies with the evidence of the misconduct. We show that the lawyer suborned perjury or that the doctor billed for services not rendered. We argue that these professionals are a danger to the public. Removing the license of a corrupt professional is often the most effective way to stop the fraud ring. It cuts off the head of the snake. We are committed to cleaning up the legal and medical professions by removing those who use their licenses to commit litigation fraud.
5. Defending Against Allegations of Fraud
Accusations of litigation fraud are sometimes weaponized by insurance companies to deny legitimate claims which requires a vigorous defense to distinguish between an honest mistake and criminal intent.
Not every inconsistency is a lie. Memory is fallible and medical records are often messy. We defend clients who are wrongly accused of fraud.
We represent plaintiffs and attorneys who are facing sanctions motions or criminal charges. We understand that the line between zealous advocacy and fraud can be thin. We fight to keep our clients on the right side of that line.
Mistake vs. Intent to Deceive
The core of any fraud charge is the intent to deceive. We argue that our client made an honest mistake. If a client failed to disclose a prior injury because they genuinely forgot about it that is not fraud.
We present evidence of the confusion or the lack of sophistication of the client. We argue that the insurance company is trying to use a minor clerical error to avoid paying a valid claim. We put the actions of the client in context. We show that they relied on the advice of their prior counsel or that they were confused by the complex legal questions. We negate the mens rea required for litigation fraud.
The Litigation Privilege Defense
The litigation privilege protects statements made in the course of judicial proceedings from being the basis of civil liability. This is a critical defense for attorneys.
We argue that the filings and the arguments made by the attorney are absolutely privileged. We defend the right of the lawyer to advocate for their client even if the claims ultimately fail. We distinguish between advocacy and fraud. We argue that a lawyer cannot be sued for fraud simply because they lost the case. We protect the adversarial system by ensuring that attorneys are not afraid to bring difficult cases.
6. Why Clients Choose SJKP LLP for Litigation Fraud
We combine the investigative power of a private intelligence agency with the legal authority of a top-tier litigation firm to destroy fraudulent claims and protect the innocent.
At SJKP LLP we understand that litigation fraud is an attack on your financial survival. We do not treat these cases as the cost of doing business. We treat them as a war.
Our firm is chosen because we go deeper than the defense counsel assigned by insurance carriers. We find the link between the doctor and the lawyer that no one else saw. We find the video of the plaintiff playing basketball that destroys the case. We have the courage to file the RICO suit that shuts down the criminal enterprise.
We act with precision and aggression. We preserve the evidence that proves the lie. We negotiate from a position of power because the other side knows we can prove the fraud. Whether you are an insurer fighting a wave of fake claims or an individual defending your integrity SJKP LLP provides the sophisticated and unwavering advocacy necessary to secure justice in the face of deception.
09 Jan, 2026
