NYC broker fees are payments for services provided by real estate brokers, now governed by the Fairness in Apartment Rentals Act (FARE Act), which mandates that the party who hires a broker is legally responsible for their compensation. Under the New York Real Property Law and administrative rules set by the New York Department of State (DOS), legal obligations regarding these fees depend on the agency relationship established and the timely provision of disclosure forms. In the high-velocity New York City real estate market of 2026, the broker fee has evolved from a matter of local custom into a strictly regulated legislative event. SJKP LLP provides the tactical oversight necessary to audit rental and sales transactions. We move beyond "market practice" to perform a surgical review of agency agreements and the procedural rails that define financial liability in New York property transfers.
1. Defining the NYC Broker Fee under New York Law
In the clinical world of New York real estate law, a broker fee is a commission earned for being the "procuring cause" of a lease or sale.
Agency and Fiduciary Duty
Under New York Real Property Law Article 12-A, a broker acts as an agent and owes a fiduciary duty to their principal. This relationship determines who is contractually obligated to pay. For decades, NYC was an outlier where tenants paid for a landlord's broker, but the 2025-2026 legal landscape has recalibrated this to align with standard contract principles: the hiring party bears the cost.
Legal Commission Vs. Deceptive Acts
It is vital to distinguish between a legal commission and prohibited "key money." Attempting to disguise illegal surcharges as brokerage fees may constitute a deceptive act or practice under General Business Law §349. SJKP LLP audits the flow of capital in a transaction to ensure that payments are not used to circumvent rent stabilization or other housing protections.
2. The Fare Act: a Paradigm Shift in Liability
The Fairness in Apartment Rentals Act (FARE Act), which took full effect in early 2025, has fundamentally altered the financial mechanics of renting in New York.The "Who Hires, Pays" Mandate: The law stipulates that the party who enters into an agreement with a broker is responsible for the commission.Landlord Responsibility: If a landlord hires a broker to list, market, or show an apartment, the landlord is legally barred from shifting that fee to the tenant.Tenant Responsibility: If a tenant explicitly hires a broker to conduct a search or represent them in negotiations, the tenant remains responsible for that broker's compensation.
3. Disclosure Requirements under NY Department of State (Dos) Rules
The validity of a NYC broker fee is often determined by the broker's compliance with administrative disclosure requirements.
The "First Substantive Contact" Rule
As required by New York Department of State disclosure rules, a broker must provide a prospective tenant or buyer with a statutory Agency Disclosure Form at the "first substantive contact." This is defined as the moment a specific property is discussed or shown.
Consequences of Non-Compliance
Failure to provide this disclosure is a material defect. If a broker fails to clarify whom they represent at the outset, they may forfeit their legal right to a commission. Under New York Real Property Law §443, this form is a mandatory prerequisite to establishing a lawful agency relationship.
4. The Statute of Frauds and Fee Enforceability
For a broker to successfully sue for an unpaid fee, the underlying agreement must satisfy specific evidentiary standards.Written Agreement Requirement: The Statute of Frauds generally requires that agreements for broker fees be memorialized in writing to be enforceable in court.Specific Terms: An enforceable agreement must clearly outline the services to be provided, the exact percentage or dollar amount of the fee, and the specific event that triggers payment (e.g., lease execution versus move-in).Procuring Cause: Even with a contract, the broker must prove they were the "procuring cause" of the transaction. Simply showing an apartment once may not be enough if the deal was ultimately closed through independent efforts.
5. Common Legal Disputes and Deceptive Practices
When the brokerage relationship fractures, the conflict typically falls into one of three high-friction categories: Dispute TypeLegal ContextTypical OutcomeBait-and-SwitchMarketing a "no-fee" unit and demanding a fee at closing.Possible violation of General Business Law §349.Undisclosed Dual AgencyRepresenting both sides without written, informed consent.Forfeiture of commission and potential DOS sanctions.Illegal Fee ShiftingAttempting to bypass the FARE Act through "consulting fees."Potential civil liability and statutory penalties.
6. Why Legal Evaluation Matters in Real Estate Fee Disputes
NYC broker fees are a technical discipline where the difference between a valid commission and an illegal surcharge depends on the forensic integrity of the agency relationship. Relying on outdated lease templates or "handshake deals" in the post-FARE Act era is a strategic failure.SJKP LLP provides the clinical clarity needed to navigate these transactions. We move beyond the broker’s pitch to perform a cold audit of the disclosure records and agency agreements. In the 2026 legal market, any attempt to shift brokerage costs onto a non-hiring party is a terminal risk to the transaction's legality.
Evidence Checklist: Auditing Your Broker Fee
To perform a surgical review of a NYC broker fee dispute, the following evidence is essential:
- Agency Disclosure Form: Dated and signed at the first substantive contact.
- The Original Listing: Proof of how the unit was marketed (fee vs. No-fee).
- Written Brokerage Agreement: The contract establishing the commission rate.
- Communication Logs: Emails or texts discussing who hired the broker and for what purpose.
- The Lease or Purchase Contract: To confirm how the fee is referenced in the final legal instrument.
