Skip to main content
YoutubeInstagramcontact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

practices

Experts in various fields find solutions for customers. We provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

New York Pursuing Legal Compensation

A legal claim for compensation is a formal demand for an at-fault party to provide restitution for physical, financial, or emotional harm they have caused. This legal instrument serves to protect the rights of the injured party and facilitate a just resolution. In New York, these claims are governed by a complex set of laws, and understanding the specific requirements for different types of cases is crucial for a successful outcome. This guide provides an overview of the key circumstances and legal principles that underpin pursuing legal compensation in the state of New York. Legal compensation is a powerful tool that allows individuals to seek justice and recover from the damages caused by another's negligence or wrongful actions. Navigating this legal landscape requires a thorough understanding of New York's unique statutes and precedents.

contents


1. New York Pursuing Legal Compensation: Motor Vehicle Accidents


Motor vehicle accidents are a leading cause of personal injury claims in New York. The state operates under a “no-fault” insurance system, which significantly influences how a claim is handled. Under this system, an injured party must first seek compensation from their own insurance company, regardless of who was at fault for the accident. This covers medical bills and lost wages up to a certain limit. To pursue a lawsuit against the at-fault driver for pain and suffering, an injured person must prove they sustained a “serious injury.” This unique legal framework is designed to streamline the claims process for minor accidents while reserving the right to litigate for more severe cases.



The No-Fault System


New York's no-fault law is designed to ensure that accident victims receive prompt payment for basic economic losses. This system streamlines the initial compensation process by avoiding the need to prove negligence. However, a victim's right to sue is limited unless their injuries meet the legal definition of a "serious injury," as outlined in the Insurance Law. Understanding the nuances of this system is paramount, as it dictates the initial steps and limitations of any potential claim. It's a system that prioritizes quick, essential relief but places a high burden on those seeking more extensive damages.



The Serious Injury Threshold


The "serious injury" threshold is a critical element in New York personal injury law. It is defined to include various types of harm, such as:

 

  • Death
  • Dismemberment
  • Significant disfigurement
  • A bone fracture
  • Loss of a fetus
  • A permanent loss of use of a body organ, member, function or system
  • A permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member
  • A significant limitation of use of a body function or system
  • A non-permanent injury which prevents the injured person from performing all of their usual and customary daily activities for at least 90 of the first 180 days following the injury

 

Failing to meet this threshold will prevent a claim for non-economic damages like pain and suffering. The threshold exists to filter out minor claims from the court system, ensuring that litigation is reserved for the most impactful and life-altering injuries.



2. New York Pursuing Legal Compensation: Torts and Negligence Claims


A tort is a civil wrong that harms a person or their property, for which the law provides a legal remedy. The most common basis for a compensation claim is negligence. A claim must prove that the defendant’s failure to exercise reasonable care directly caused the plaintiff's injuries. This requires establishing four key elements. These claims are the foundation of personal injury law and cover a wide range of incidents, from slip-and-falls to product liability. A successful tort claim hinges on a clear link between the defendant's actions and the plaintiff's harm.



Elements of Negligence


To successfully prove a negligence claim, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant:

  • Owed a Duty: Had a legal duty of care to the plaintiff.
  • Breached the Duty: Failed to meet that duty through an act or omission.
  • Caused Damages: Directly caused the plaintiff to suffer actual harm.
  • Proximate Cause: The harm was a foreseeable result of the breach.

 

Each of these elements must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence. A failure to establish any one of these elements will result in the claim being dismissed. This rigorous framework ensures that only valid claims proceed, protecting both plaintiffs and defendants from frivolous lawsuits.



3. New York Pursuing Legal Compensation: Workplace and Professional Negligence


Injuries that occur in the workplace or as a result of a professional's conduct are subject to unique laws in New York. The state’s Workers’ Compensation Law provides a specific, no-fault framework for job-related injuries, while medical and other professional negligence claims are governed by malpractice statutes and common law. These distinct legal avenues address the specific relationships and duties involved, whether between an employer and employee or a professional and their client.



Workers’ Compensation


New York’s Workers’ Compensation Law provides a system for employees to receive benefits for injuries or illnesses sustained on the job, without having to prove employer negligence. The system covers medical expenses, lost wages, and disability benefits. In exchange for these benefits, employees typically cannot sue their employer in civil court for their injuries. This system is designed to provide a swift and reliable source of relief for injured workers, avoiding the complexities and delays of a traditional lawsuit. It is a social safety net that protects both employees and employers.



Medical and Professional Malpractice


When a professional's negligence causes harm, it can be the basis for a malpractice claim. Medical malpractice is a prominent example, where a healthcare provider's deviation from the accepted standard of care causes a patient's injury. Proving professional malpractice requires demonstrating a breach of the duty of care common to that profession, and that this breach was the direct cause of the harm. These claims are often complex, requiring expert testimony to establish the proper standard of care and how the professional deviated from it. The goal is to hold professionals accountable for their actions when they fall below the expected standard, causing serious harm.



4. New York Pursuing Legal Compensation: Emotional Distress and Defamation Claims


A claim for compensation is not limited to physical or financial harm; it can also be brought for emotional or reputational damage. While these claims can be challenging to prove, New York law recognizes a person’s right to seek compensation for significant emotional distress and harm to their reputation. These types of claims are crucial for addressing non-physical injuries that can have a profound and lasting impact on an individual's life and well-being.



Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress


This type of claim is a civil tort that requires proof of a defendant’s "extreme and outrageous" conduct that intentionally or recklessly caused the plaintiff to suffer "severe emotional distress." These claims are often filed in conjunction with other torts, such as assault or battery, and require a high standard of proof. The conduct must be so extreme that it goes beyond the bounds of what is tolerable in a civilized society. This high bar exists to prevent litigation over minor or everyday annoyances.



Defamation


Defamation is the act of making a false statement that harms a person's reputation. It can take two forms: libel (written) and slander (spoken). To establish a defamation claim in New York, a plaintiff must prove that a false statement of fact was made, published to a third party, and caused them actual damage. For public figures, the standard of proof is higher, requiring evidence of "actual malice" — that the statement was made with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth. This dual standard balances the right to freedom of speech with the right to protect one's reputation from false and malicious attacks.


28 Aug, 2025

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

quick menu
online Consult
call center
online Consult
call center