Statute of Limitations for Solicitation: Legal Time Limits for Prosecution

Unlike 'attempt' or 'conspiracy,' solicitation does not require any 'overt act' beyond the communication itself.

• Attempt: Requires a substantial step toward completing the crime.
• Conspiracy: Requires an agreement between two or more people.
• Solicitation: Only requires the act of asking or inducing.
•  

Because solicitation is a standalone charge, the statute of limitations applies specifically to the date the request was made. Even if the person being asked says 'no' or immediately goes to the police, the solicitor has technically committed the crime, and the state-s window for prosecution begins at that moment.

Most jurisdictions in 2026 follow the 'unilateral' theory. This means that even if the person you solicited was an undercover officer who never intended to commit the crime, you can still be charged. From a defense perspective, this makes the timing of the request the most critical forensic anchor in the case, as it is the only definitive point of the crime-s occurrence.

If a solicitor asks a person once to commit a crime, the clock starts that day. If there is a series of requests over several weeks, the statute typically begins from the 'last overt act' of inducement.

• Discrete Communications: Each separate email, text, or meeting can be viewed as a continuing course of conduct.
• The Completion Point: Once the communication is finished and the solicitor has done all they intend to do to induce the other person, the limitations period is 'triggered.'

There are specific legal scenarios where the statute of limitations is 'tolled' or paused.

• Absence from Jurisdiction: If the suspect leaves the state or country to avoid prosecution, the clock often stops until they return.
• Concealment: If the solicitor takes active, fraudulent steps to hide the crime, some courts may extend the filing deadline. However, 'discovery' rules(which start the clock only when the victim finds out about the crime)are rarely applied to solicitation because the state is the primary 'victim' of an inchoate offense.

The severity of the solicitation charge is usually a reflection of the severity of the intended crime.

• Misdemeanor Solicitation: 
• If the target crime is a misdemeanor (such as minor property damage), the solicitation is typically a misdemeanor. These often have shorter time limits, such as one to two years.
• Felony Solicitation: 
• If the target crime is a felony (such as robbery or arson), the solicitation becomes a felony. These carry much longer prosecution windows, often ranging from three to seven years.

For the most serious criminal charges, such as soliciting murder or certain high-level sex crimes, many jurisdictions have removed the statute of limitations entirely. In these cases, the state can bring charges decades after the initial request was made. SJKP LLP performs a clinical audit of the target offense to determine if the state-s power to prosecute is limited by time or if it remains 'open' indefinitely.

If a solicitor asks someone to commit a fraud, and the fraud is actually committed, the solicitor can be charged with both the fraud (as an accomplice) and the solicitation.

• The Scenario: 

If the statute of limitations for the fraud has expired, the state can still pursue the solicitation charge if its specific clock is still running.

• The Defense Argument: 

We analyze whether the solicitation 'merged' into the completed crime. If the law in your jurisdiction requires merger, and the main crime is time-barred, the solicitation may also be unprosecutable.

When we evaluate criminal liability, we look for 'legal inconsistencies.' If the target crime was never committed, the prosecutor-s only path is the solicitation charge. If they missed the deadline for the target crime, they often 'reach back' to the solicitation. We audit these filings to ensure the prosecutor is not attempting to 'resurrect' a dead case by mischaracterizing the timing of the initial request.

Early legal review focuses on 'forensic dating.' We use digital metadata, communication logs, and witness statements to prove exactly when the 'last act' occurred. If we can prove the solicitation was complete outside the time limits for prosecution, we can file a 'Motion to Quash' or a 'Motion to Dismiss' before you ever have to step foot in a courtroom for a trial.

During the investigation phase, knowing the statute of limitations allows for a controlled response to law enforcement. If the clock is close to expiring, the defense can avoid 'tolling' behaviors and prepare a terminal challenge for the moment the state attempts a late filing. SJKP LLP ensures that your legal rights are not eroded by a state that has sat on its hands for too long.

Managing a solicitation matter requires a proactive approach: ensuring that the 'statutory rails' of the justice system are used to stop a prosecution that is legally expired.

To perform a surgical review of your statute of limitations for solicitation matter, the following documentation is required:

• The Indictment or Complaint: To see exactly what dates the state is alleging the crime occurred.
• Communication Logs: Timestamps of emails, texts, or calls that constitute the alleged solicitation.
• Travel Records: To determine if 'tolling' applies based on your presence in the jurisdiction.
• Target Offense Classification: A clear identification of the specific crime alleged to have been solicited.
• Prior Case Filings: Any previous attempts by the state to prosecute related matters.