Attorney for Stalking Charges in New York Secures Probation

Following the termination of a romantic relationship, the complainant reported repeated unwanted contact and alleged unauthorized entry into a residential building.

The prosecution asserted that the conduct constituted a pattern of behavior sufficient to support stalking related charges, compounded by alleged violation of a court issued temporary order of protection.

The factual allegations included repeated phone calls over a short period, presence at the complainant’s residence after being asked to leave, and subsequent contact following interim court directives.

Under New York law, such conduct may be aggregated to establish criminal liability where intent, persistence, and fear are alleged, making early factual clarification essential.

The defense emphasized that the client acknowledged the impropriety of the conduct and expressed genuine remorse from the outset, avoiding contested factual hearings that could have hardened the court’s view.

Evidence was presented showing that the conduct arose during a period of acute emotional instability following the sudden end of a long term relationship, rather than from malicious or controlling intent.

The defense further demonstrated that the client voluntarily engaged in mental health counseling and complied with treatment recommendations, positioning rehabilitation as a realistic and ongoing process.

While the prosecution argued that post order contact warranted enhanced penalties, the defense clarified the surrounding circumstances and communication history without minimizing the seriousness of court directives.

The attorney carefully distinguished intentional defiance from situational misunderstanding, while reinforcing that no threats, violence, or coercive conduct occurred.

This framing allowed the court to assess proportionality and avoid default escalation toward incarceration.

The court imposed a probationary sentence with structured conditions rather than jail time, recognizing the client’s acceptance of responsibility, lack of prior criminal history, and demonstrated commitment to treatment.

This outcome allowed the client to maintain employment, continue therapy, and comply with court supervision without the permanent consequences associated with incarceration.

The case illustrates how early intervention by an experienced attorney for stalking charges can materially alter both legal exposure and long term personal impact.