Skip to main content

call now

  • About
  • lawyers
  • practices
  • Insights
  • Case Results
  • Locations
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

AccessibilityCookie StatementDisclaimersLegal NoticePrivacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
BROCHURE DOWNLOAD

U.S.

New York
Washington, D.C.

Asia

Seoul
Busan
BROCHURE DOWNLOAD

© 2025 SJKP, LLP
All rights reserved. Attorney Advertising.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

BROCHURE DOWNLOAD
Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone

  1. Home
  2. Stalking | How a Stalking Defense in New York Led to a No Action Outcome

Case Results

Based on our recently accumulated litigation database, we provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

Stalking | How a Stalking Defense in New York Led to a No Action Outcome



When a person is unexpectedly accused of stalking, the legal and emotional impact can be overwhelming.

New York prosecutors often take stalking complaints seriously, especially when a neighbor or acquaintance reports repeated contact.

In this case study, our team represented a resident who was experiencing extreme stress due to ongoing noise disturbances in their apartment building.

Despite being the noise victim, the client was suddenly accused of stalking after leaving a note requesting cooperation.

Through a structured defense, a factual investigation, and the guidance of experienced counsel, the client ultimately obtained a non-prosecution (no further action) result.

This case highlights how a thoughtful and evidence-based approach is essential in defending against stalking allegations in New York.

contents


1. Stalking New York – Background of the Complaint and Initial Issues


The client was reported to law enforcement after visiting a neighbor’s door to address serious noise problems.

Although the client intended only to communicate peacefully, the neighbor claimed that the actions created fear and constituted stalking under New York law.

Our criminal defense team analyzed the complaint and quickly identified that the client’s conduct did not meet the statutory definitions required for stalking.



Facts Confirmed During the First Consultation


During the initial review, several key facts emerged:

 

  • The client was suffering from prolonged noise disturbances from the upstairs neighbor.
  • When the client attempted to resolve the issue politely, the neighbor responded aggressively and made verbal threats.
  • The client later left a short, polite note at the neighbor's door requesting reduced noise.
  • The neighbor then filed a stalking complaint, alleging repeated unwanted contact.

 

After reviewing these details, the defense team concluded that a tailored legal strategy was necessary to challenge the stalking allegation.



2. Stalking New York – Legal Requirements and Applicable Statutes


In New York, stalking is governed primarily by NY Penal Law §120.45–§120.60, which focuses on intentional conduct that causes reasonable fear for a person’s safety.


For a conviction, prosecutors must prove that the accused engaged in:

 

  • Repeated conduct, and
  • With intent to cause fear, or
  • That the conduct would reasonably cause fear.


Understanding How Stalking Is Defined


Under New York law, stalking may involve:

 

  • Intentional, repeated contact with no legitimate purpose,
  • Conduct likely to cause fear of harm,
  • Actions directed at a specific person despite objections.

 

Our defense analysis confirmed that a respectful, non-threatening note qualifies as a legitimate purpose, and therefore does not meet the stalking standard.



Penalties for Stalking Under New York Law


Potential penalties include:

 

  • Stalking 4th Degree (§120.45):Up to 3 months jail
  • Stalking 3rd Degree (§120.50):Up to 1 year jail
  • Stalking 2nd Degree (§120.55):Class E felony
  • Stalking 1st Degree (§120.60):Class D felony

 

Because this case involved one noteand no threatening behavior, the defense emphasized that the statutory threshold for stalking was not met.



3. Stalking New York – Strategy and Defense Development


After reviewing the evidence, the attorneys structured a defense aimed at showing:

 

  • The client acted with a legitimate purpose, and
  • No conduct involved fear-inducing or repetitive behavior.

 

This approach ensured the matter did not escalate into formal charges.



Presenting the Noise-Based Conflict as the Origin of Events


The defense demonstrated:

 

  • The noise disturbances were real, continuous, and disruptive.
  • The client’s attempt to communicate was polite and reasonable.
  • The neighbor escalated the situation with aggressive behavior.
  • Mental health records showed significant stress caused by the noise.


Establishing That the Note Did Not Constitute Stalking Behavior


The defense highlighted:

 

  • The note contained no threats.
  • No repeated or intrusive contact occurred.
  • The message expressed a desire for peaceful resolution.

 

Stalking requires intent to instill fear, which was entirely absent.



4. Stalking New York – Advocacy, Evidence Submission, and Final Outcome


Stalking New York – Advocacy, Evidence Submission, and Final Outcome

 

The attorneys submitted all factual evidence, medical documents, and a detailed explanation of the noise conflict.

Law enforcement reviewed the materials and accepted that the situation was a misunderstanding, not stalking.



Conclusion: Non-Prosecution Decision


Thanks to this well-organized defense, the result was:

 

  • Full non-prosecution(no charges)
  • Recognition that the client’s conduct had a legitimate purpose
  • Avoidance of criminal record or further investigation

 

The client expressed deep relief and gratitude for the swift resolution.

 

If you are being investigated for stalking or facing accusations arising from noise disputes, misunderstandings, or neighbor conflicts, SJKP can help.

 

We provide:

 

  • Fact-based legal analysis
  • Evidence collection and presentation
  • Strategic defense planning
  • Representation during investigation

 

Contact SJKP for a confidential consultation.


Related lawyers

Donghoo Sohn attorney profile photo

Donghoo Sohn

Associate

New york

Corporate

Will & Trust

Immigration

Real Estate

Donghoo Sohn attorney profile photo

Donghoo Sohn

Associate

New york

Corporate

Will & Trust

Immigration

Real Estate

Related practices


Criminal Evidence

24 Nov, 2025


Older Posts

view list

Newer Posts

The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Related lawyers

Donghoo Sohn attorney profile photo

Donghoo Sohn

Associate

New york

Corporate

Will & Trust

Immigration

Real Estate

Donghoo Sohn attorney profile photo

Donghoo Sohn

Associate

New york

Corporate

Will & Trust

Immigration

Real Estate

Related practices


Criminal Evidence

contents

  • False Report Defense Result in Washington D.C. | Employee Accused of Fabricating an Assault Claim

  • Personal Injury Attorney New York Defense of a Client Accused of Assault and Obstruction of Governmental Administration

  • Sentencing for Aggravated Robbery: How Our Defense Team Secured a Favorable Outcome in New York

  • Criminal Defense Law Firm in Washington D.C. | Successful Defense in a Corporate Embezzlement Allegation