Skip to main content
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

Case Results

Based on our recently accumulated litigation database, we provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

Bodily Injury Lawyer | Non Prosecution Result in an Alleged Assault Incident

Author : Donghoo Sohn, Esq.



In Washington D.C., allegations involving bodily injury can trigger serious criminal exposure, including misdemeanor or felony assault charges depending on the severity of harm.

 

Under D.C. Code § 22-404, prosecutors evaluate whether physical injury was caused “knowingly or intentionally,” and any misunderstanding during an incident can escalate into a criminal investigation. 

 

This case explains how a bodily injury lawyer in Washington D.C. guided a civilian client through an unexpected allegation of assault that arose from a misinterpreted incident inside a residential building. 

 

Through structured evidence gathering, witness statements, and legal analysis of statutory elements, the defense successfully secured a Non Prosecution outcome.

contents


1. Bodily Injury Lawyer | Initial Background and Legal Exposure


Bodily Injury Lawyer | Initial Background and Legal Exposure

 

The client contacted a bodily injury lawyer in Washington D.C. after learning he was being investigated for assault stemming from an accidental fall involving his friend.

 

The allegation risked a formal filing decision under D.C. Code § 22-404(a)(2) if law enforcement believed a “significant bodily injury” had occurred. The client sought urgent representation to prevent criminal charges.



Incident Overview


The client and a close friend spent the evening at the client’s apartment after work. 

 

The friend briefly stepped outside to smoke, and moments later, a loud noise echoed through the hallway. 

 

When the client checked, he discovered the friend had slipped and fallen on a stair landing, complaining of pain but showing no signs of intentional harm. 

 

The client assisted him back inside.


However, another resident, hearing the noise and seeing the injured friend, mistakenly believed a physical altercation had occurred and called the police. 

 

This misunderstanding formed the basis of the assault allegation.



2. Bodily Injury Lawyer | Key Legal Issues Identified


The bodily injury lawyer analyzed the statutory elements of assault in D.C., focusing on whether the evidence supported “intentional or knowing” causation of injury. 

 

The defense also examined whether the physical injuries shown aligned with accidental trauma rather than inflicted force.



Ongoing Relationship Between the Parties


The lawyer documented that the client and the reported victim maintained a positive relationship both before and after the incident. 

 

They shared long standing friendship, had no history of conflict, and continued interacting normally following the accident. 

 

The injured friend also submitted a statement affirming that he never believed an assault occurred and did not want charges pursued. 

 

These details supported the argument that intentional harm was inconsistent with the nature of their relationship.



Analysis of Injury Patterns and Origin


The bodily injury lawyer examined medical observations and images of the fall related injuries. 

 

The friend’s abrasions were consistent with slipping on a stair edge not with a blow or intentional strike. No evidence suggested forceful contact by another person. 

 

This alignment between the injuries and the account of an accidental fall undermined the suspicion of assault under D.C. Code § 22-404.



3. Bodily Injury Lawyer | Defense Strategy and Evidence Development


Once retained, the bodily injury lawyer deployed a structured, evidence based defense strategy aimed at persuading investigators that the incident was accidental.



Clarifying the Reporting Party’s Misinterpretation


The caller who notified police later acknowledged that she reacted out of fear and did not witness any physical contact between the two men. 

 

The lawyer collected a sworn statement demonstrating that the reporting party only heard noise and made assumptions. 

 

This clarification significantly weakened the evidentiary foundation for criminal charges.



Consistent Client Statements and Corroboration


The lawyer ensured that the client provided a detailed, consistent account of events from the start of the investigation. Statements from the friend, along with physical evidence from the stairwell and apartment hallway, aligned with the client’s version. 

 

This consistency increased credibility and assisted prosecutors in assessing the case accurately.



4. Bodily Injury Lawyer | Outcome: Non Prosecution Decision


Bodily Injury Lawyer | Outcome: Non Prosecution Decision

 

After reviewing the materials submitted by counsel including witness statements, medical consistency analysis, and statutory evaluation prosecutors concluded that the evidence did not meet the threshold required for an assault charge. 

 

The matter was formally closed with a Non Prosecution outcome.


This resolution protected the client from criminal exposure, employment disruption, and the long term impact of an assault allegation on background checks.



Importance of Early Legal Intervention


This case shows how quickly an accidental event can be misunderstood as criminal conduct under District law, especially when bodily injury is involved. 

 

Early involvement of a bodily injury lawyer can prevent escalation, secure timely witness statements, and ensure that investigative authorities receive a complete and accurate picture. 

 

Without prompt intervention, the case could easily have proceeded toward formal charges.



5. Conclusion |When to Contact a Bodily Injury Lawyer in Washington D.C.


Allegations involving injury, even when accidental, require immediate legal attention due to the District’s strict assault statutes. 

 

A bodily injury lawyer in Washington D.C. can evaluate intent, injury patterns, witness credibility, and statutory defenses early, protecting clients from unnecessary criminal liability.


10 Dec, 2025


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone