Skip to main content
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

Case Results

Based on our recently accumulated litigation database, we provide customized solutions based on a thoroughly analyzed litigation database.

Breach of Confidentiality Defense in New York After Employment Separation



A breach of confidentiality allegation in New York can escalate quickly into a civil or criminal exposure if a former employer believes proprietary business information or client data was improperly used.


This case analysis explains how a former employee accused of disclosing client information to a competing business secured a non prosecution outcome based on insufficient evidence.


Because confidentiality disputes often involve overlapping issues of client contact, competitive employment, and alleged misuse of business information, a structured defense grounded in New York legal standards is essential.


The following content outlines how the defense reviewed the facts, evaluated statutory requirements, analyzed the absence of confidential information use, and ultimately demonstrated that no breach of confidentiality occurred.

contents


1. Breach of Confidentiality New York | Background of the Allegation


Breach of Confidentiality New York Background of the Allegation

 

When the client left her prior workplace, the former employer claimed she improperly used confidential customer lists to attract regular clients to her new job.


In New York, a breach of confidentiality claim requires proof that the information was truly confidential, economically valuable, and actually used or disclosed standards that often cannot be met without concrete evidence.



Origin of the Dispute and Client’s Move to a New Workplace


The client had worked for more than three years at a massage establishment in downtown New York, building strong rapport and natural customer loyalty.
After ongoing workplace mistreatment, she resigned voluntarily and later accepted a position at a competing business.


Some long term customers learned of her departure on their own and reached out to her through personal messaging, leading to natural inquiries and unrelated refund requests.


The former employer misunderstood these events as intentional solicitation and alleged that she had disclosed confidential business information.


This misunderstanding escalated into a formal complaint alleging breach of confidentiality.



Sequence of Events That Led to the Accusation


ㆍUnstable working conditions and repeated workplace mistreatment

 

ㆍVoluntary resignation and transition to a different establishment

 

ㆍLong term customers independently messaging the client

 

ㆍCustomers requesting refunds, which the employer misunderstood as being coordinated

 

ㆍAdditional suspicion that business information had been transferred

 

ㆍFiling of a breach of confidentiality complaint

 

ㆍClient seeking New York attorney support

 



2. Breach of Confidentiality New York | Legal Review and Applicable Standards


New York law does not automatically treat customer relationships as proprietary unless specific safeguards, agreements, and confidentiality measures are in place.


The defense examined whether the employer’s claim satisfied the legal elements required to prove any breach of confidentiality or misuse of business information.



Legal Elements the Former Employer Needed to Prove


To establish a breach of confidentiality or improper use of business information in New York, the accusing party must show:

 

 

1. Information Was Not Publicly Known

ㆍIt must not be readily available to the general public

ㆍIt must not be obtainable without the employer’s internal access

ㆍAny information widely known to staff or customers does not qualify as confidential

 

 

2. Independent Economic Value

ㆍThe information must provide a competitive advantage

ㆍIt must require substantial time, effort, or expense to develop

ㆍCustomer relationships formed through personal skill may not constitute proprietary lists

 

 

3. Reasonable Measures to Maintain Secrecy

ㆍExistence of written confidentiality policies

ㆍAccess restrictions or password protections

ㆍEvidence of enforcement or ongoing confidentiality management

 

 

4. Evidence of Actual Misuse or Disclosure

ㆍIntentional access for competitive use

ㆍTransmission, copying, exporting, or sharing client lists

ㆍUse of information for commercial gain

 

 

Without these components, a breach of confidentiality claim generally cannot succeed.



3. Breach of Confidentiality New York | Defense Strategy and Evidence Review


Breach of Confidentiality New York Defense Strategy and Evidence Review

 

The defense carefully analyzed the client’s communications, digital activity, employment records, and customer interactions to demonstrate that no confidential information was disclosed or used.


This structured approach highlighted the absence of intent, absence of misuse, and the purely voluntary actions of customers.



Core Defense Arguments Presented to Investigators


1. No Intent to Solicit or Misuse Client Information

 

The attorney submitted:

 

ㆍFull screenshots of message histories

ㆍComplete call logs

ㆍProof showing the client did not initiate any customer contact

 

These materials established that customers reached out on their own and that no client list had been consulted or accessed.

 

 

2. No Digital Evidence of Confidential Information Use

 

A forensic review of the client’s phone and laptop showed:

 

ㆍNo stored customer lists

ㆍNo forwarding or exporting of client data

ㆍNo access attempts to the former employer’s system

 

This confirmed that no breach of confidentiality had occurred.

 

 

3. Customers’ Actions Were Voluntary

 

Customers independently requested refunds or inquired about her new workplace, demonstrating that:

 

ㆍTheir decisions were based on personal loyalty, not solicitation

ㆍThe client did not induce any business movement

ㆍCustomer migration was driven by individual preference, not confidential information use

 

 



4. Breach of Confidentiality New York | Final Outcome and Legal Conclusion


After reviewing all evidence, investigators concluded that there was no basis for prosecution because the required elements for breach of confidentiality were not met.


The former employer could not show that proprietary information was disclosed, accessed, or used for competitive advantage.



Non Prosecution Result and Additional Legal Support


The New York defense attorney successfully established:

 

ㆍNo confidential information transfer

 

ㆍNo willful intent or commercial exploitation

 

ㆍNo evidence supporting the employer’s allegations

 

As a result, the case was formally closed with a non prosecution outcome due to insufficient evidence.


The defense team also prepared to assist the client in the event of any civil follow up such as defamation or wrongful accusation, though no additional action was ultimately taken.


04 Dec, 2025


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone