1. Car Accident Lawyer Consultation New York | Two Injured Occupants and Elevated Charges
From the first Car Accident Lawyer Consultation, it was clear the 0.19% BAC made it impossible to dispute intoxication under New York law.
Prosecutors therefore combined: DWI, and An injury-related traffic offense arguing that intoxication caused the crash.
Because both elements were in play, the Car Accident Lawyer Consultation quickly shifted to whether the prosecution could actually prove causation, not just intoxication.
2. Car Accident Lawyer Consultation New York | Causation and Injury-Threshold Disputes
During the Car Accident Lawyer Consultation, two issues emerged:
- Did intoxication actually cause the crash?
- Did the neck strains legally qualify as a prosecutable “injury”?
The client explained he had completed a right turn and was moving steadily in his lane when the other vehicle abruptly merged into his path.
Road geometry, angles, and approach patterns analyzed during the Car Accident Lawyer Consultation suggested the merging driver may have created the hazard.
Reconstructing the Crash with Video and Expert Analysis
To avoid a “he-said, she-said” battle, the team collected:
- Dashcam footage
- Front and rear camera video
- Accident reconstruction analysis
Frame-by-frame review showed:
- The defendant completed a lawful turn and stayed in his lane
- The other vehicle aggressively merged from the on-ramp
Expert analysis indicated the impact point supported that the merging driver violated lane-change rules a major finding uncovered through the Car Accident Lawyer Consultation.
Challenging Whether the Claimed Injuries Met the Legal Standard
A key part of the Car Accident Lawyer Consultation involved whether the alleged injuries were legally substantial.
Medical records showed:
- Neck pain only
- Two weeks of conservative therapy
- No emergency care
- No long-term impairment
New York courts often hold that temporary soft-tissue discomfort does not qualify as a criminal-level injury, which became a cornerstone of the defense.
3. Car Accident Lawyer Consultation New York | Court Rejects Injury Charge
As the matter progressed, the Car Accident Lawyer Consultation strategy separated:
- Admitted DWI, from
- Disputed injury allegations
Counsel argued:
- The unsafe merge caused the impact
- The medical complaints were short-term soreness, not a prosecutable injury
The court agreed.
Scientific and Legal Arguments Narrow the Conviction
The judge accepted the defense arguments developed during the Car Accident Lawyer Consultation, noting:
- DWI was punishable, but intoxication was not the cause of the crash
- The merging driver bore significant fault
- The injuries were transient, lacking legal significance
- Prosecutors failed to prove a qualifying injury
Result: The injury charge was dismissed, leaving only a DWI fine and routine administrative consequences.
This dramatically reduced the client’s exposure to jail time and avoided a more serious criminal record.
4. Car Accident Lawyer Consultation New York | Why Evidence and Early Counsel Matter
This case shows how quickly a routine Car Accident Lawyer Consultation can turn into a complex defense requiring:
- Video evidence review
- Accident reconstruction
- Medical-record scrutiny
- Witness credibility analysis
Courts do not rely on emotional pleas they look for objective proof of causation and injury.
If you or a loved one are facing DWI or injury-related allegations after a crash and need a Car Accident Lawyer Consultation, SJKP can help.
Our team integrates traffic engineering, medical evaluation, and criminal defense strategy to determine what was truly caused by impaired driving and what was caused by other drivers’ negligence.
For a confidential evaluation, contact SJKP today.
04 Dec, 2025
