Skip to main content
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

Family Law Attorney Brooklyn Non Parentage Judgment



A family law attorney Brooklyn successfully represented a former spouse in a complex parentage dispute involving a child registered under the marital presumption despite the absence of any biological relationship. The matter required careful navigation of New York family law principles governing marital presumptions, evidentiary burdens, and post-judgment registry correction procedures. Through a structured litigation strategy and objective proof, the court ultimately confirmed the absence of a legal parent-child relationship and ordered formal correction of official family records.

Contents


1. Family Law Attorney Brooklyn | Client Background and Legal Risk


The client sought assistance from a family law attorney Brooklyn after discovering unexpected parentage information during routine post divorce documentation. Although the marriage had effectively ended years earlier, New York’s legal presumptions created ongoing legal exposure that required formal judicial resolution.


Discovery of Unexpected Parentage Registration


After completing an uncontested divorce, the client requested updated family records while preparing for a new stage of life. 

 

During this process, the client learned for the first time that a child, unknown to him, had been legally registered as his offspring. 

 

The client had no knowledge of the child’s birth, had never cohabited with the former spouse during the relevant period, and had no involvement in conception or childbirth. 

 

Despite these facts, the registration carried immediate legal consequences unless corrected through court intervention.



2. Family Law Attorney Brooklyn | Core Legal Issues Identified


This case centered on the conflict between statutory parentage presumptions and biological reality under New York family law. A family law attorney Brooklyn evaluated how the presumption arose and whether it could be rebutted through legally admissible evidence.


Application of Marital Presumption of Parentage


The child was born within the legally defined post divorce timeframe, triggering an automatic presumption of parentage based solely on marital status. 

 

This presumption operates irrespective of actual biological connection and is routinely applied during civil registration. 

 

As a result, the client was listed as the legal parent by operation of law rather than factual proof. Overcoming this presumption required affirmative litigation rather than administrative correction.



3. Family Law Attorney Brooklyn | Litigation Strategy and Representation


The family law attorney Brooklyn developed a focused litigation plan designed to rebut the presumption through objective and procedural compliance. The strategy emphasized factual separation, scientific evidence, and future legal risk mitigation.


Reframing the Marital Relationship Reality


Although the marriage formally existed during part of the relevant period, the attorney demonstrated that the marital relationship had effectively ceased years earlier. 

 

Evidence of long term separation, lack of cohabitation, and independent living arrangements was organized to show that the underlying factual basis for presumed parentage did not exist.



Genetic Testing and Evidentiary Support


Pursuant to court authorization, genetic testing was conducted between the client and the child. The results conclusively excluded any biological relationship. 

 

These findings served as the central evidentiary pillar of the case and directly rebutted the statutory presumption. 

 

The family law attorney Brooklyn ensured that the testing procedure, chain of custody, and reporting complied fully with evidentiary standards to avoid procedural challenges.



4. Family Law Attorney Brooklyn | Court Decision and Legal Outcome


After reviewing documentary evidence, testimony, and genetic test results, the court ruled in favor of the client. The judgment confirmed that no legal parent child relationship existed and ordered corrective measures to eliminate ongoing legal exposure.

26 Jan, 2026


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Book a Consultation
Online
Phone
CLICK TO START YOUR CONSULTATION
Online
Phone