Top Law Firms Near Me New York Lpr after Ice Detention

The client complied with INA §245(a), which permits adjustment of status for individuals who were inspected and admitted into the United States.

All filings were submitted before the period of authorized stay expired, preserving lawful presence under 8 C.F.R. §245.2(a)(4)(ii).

No criminal convictions or fraud findings existed at the time of filing, and the marriage was bona fide and well documented.

Despite this compliance, the client was unexpectedly questioned by ICE officers during a routine workday and taken into custody.

He was placed into removal proceedings under INA §240 and transferred to immigration detention, creating an immediate risk of separation from his U.S. Citizen spouse.

This sudden enforcement action required urgent legal response from a top law firms near me–level immigration team in New York.

The bond request was argued pursuant to INA §236(a), which grants immigration judges discretionary authority to release certain detainees on bond.

The firm demonstrated that the client was neither a flight risk nor a danger to the community, emphasizing stable residence, marital ties, and pending USCIS adjudication.

The Immigration Judge granted bond, ordering the client’s release from ICE custody.

Securing release was not only essential for the client’s personal liberty but also for procedural fairness in the pending green card process.

Detention would have significantly impaired preparation for the USCIS interview and coordination with evidence submissions.

This intervention reflects the type of immediate crisis management expected from top law firms near me in New York handling complex immigration litigation.

The interview was prepared with full awareness of INA §204 and §245 requirements, including the bona fide marriage standard.

Special attention was given to addressing the ICE detention history without creating adverse inferences.

Counsel accompanied the client to the USCIS interview, ensuring procedural compliance and record clarity.

USCIS approved the adjustment of status application after the interview.

The approval confirmed that the client remained statutorily eligible for permanent residence despite the intervening enforcement action.

This outcome demonstrated that ICE detention does not automatically bar adjustment when the law is properly applied.

Termination was sought pursuant to 8 C.F.R. §1239.2(f), which allows dismissal of proceedings when the respondent is no longer removable.

The Immigration Judge acknowledged USCIS’s approval and terminated the proceedings accordingly.

This step was essential to securing the client’s long term stability in the United States.

With removal proceedings closed, the client was able to resume lawful life and employment in New York.

The case highlights how top law firms near me can protect immigrant families even under sudden and severe enforcement pressure.

Precise legal timing and jurisdiction aware advocacy were decisive factors in this outcome.