Case Results

DUI Lawyer NY | Alcohol Related Traffic Collision Defense, Reduced Fine Outcome

A DUI lawyer in NY is frequently required when a driver is accused of operating a vehicle while intoxicated and causing a traffic collision, particularly in situations where the prosecution seeks jail exposure under the New York Vehicle and Traffic Law. New York’s DWI framework makes it a criminal offense to operate a motor vehicle with a BAC of 0.08% or higher, and even cases involving lower BAC levels can lead to severe penalties when an accident with injury occurs.In this matter, a DUI lawyer in NY represented a client who was involved in a late night alcohol related traffic incident after leaving a social gathering. Through structured mitigation, proactive rehabilitation efforts, and evidence based negotiation with prosecutors, counsel secured a significantly reduced penalty a modest fine instead of incarceration despite the accident context.This case illustrates how early intervention, corrective behavioral evidence, and credible third party support can substantially reduce criminal exposure in DWI accident cases throughout New York State.

Personal Data Protection Case | Misdemeanor Exposure Resulting in a Reduced Fine

Personal data protection violations in Washington D.C. can rapidly escalate into criminal exposure when an individual improperly accesses, discloses, or distributes personally identifiable information obtained through government channels or legal processes. The District imposes strict obligations on anyone who handles sensitive data, and unauthorized disclosure can trigger investigations under multiple statutory frameworks, especially when the information originates from prosecutorial records. In this case, a Washington D.C. law firm experienced in personal data protection matters represented a resident who mistakenly disclosed identifying information from a government held investigative document. Through structured mitigation, legal analysis, and negotiation, counsel successfully reduced the client’s exposure from potential misdemeanor charges to a minimal fine, preventing a criminal conviction and protecting the client’s employment and personal record.

Criminal Defense Attorney in New Jersey Obtains Not Guilty Verdict on Drug Purchase and Probation for Use

A criminal defense attorney in New Jersey is often needed when a defendant faces both drug purchase and drug use allegations, particularly in cases where the prosecution lacks independent corroboration. In New York and New Jersey, drug purchase requires clear proof of an actual transaction, while drug use may be established through statements, circumstantial evidence, and timeline analysis.In this matter, the client had a prior methamphetamine record, yet the defense successfully separated the legal elements of “purchase” and “use,” demonstrated the absence of transaction evidence, and presented meaningful mitigation based on family responsibilities and rehabilitation efforts.As a result, the court found the client not guilty of the alleged drug purchase due to insufficient proof and imposed probation for the drug use conduct after reviewing substantial mitigating materials.

Criminal Defense Firm in New York | Defense of a Client Wrongfully Accused of Filing a False Police Report

A criminal defense firm in New York is frequently asked to intervene when a sexual assault victim unexpectedly becomes the target of retaliatory accusations, especially in cases where the original assailant seeks to weaponize New York Penal Law provisions on false reporting. Under NY Penal Law §§240.50-240.60, filing a false report is a misdemeanor or felony depending on the degree, and a conviction can produce permanent criminal records, immigration risks, employment barriers, and severe reputational harm.In this matter, the criminal defense firm represented a woman who initially reported a sexual assault to the NYPD. When prosecutors later declined to pursue charges against the male suspect due to evidentiary limitations, the suspect retaliated by filing a complaint alleging that she knowingly submitted a false report.Through structured evidence analysis, trauma-informed investigation, and the presentation of legally admissible corroboration regarding the complainant’s lack of fraudulent intent, the criminal defense firm secured a full acquittal, preventing the client from being wrongfully criminalized for seeking help.